Corvo Is Not An Honorable Man

Recommended Videos

Robert Rath

New member
Oct 8, 2010
520
0
0
Quaxar said:
And I'm curious, is the title of your article a reference to the speech of Marc Antony in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar or am I overinterpreting?
That didn't occur to me, actually! But I am reading The Fault In Our Stars right now, so maybe it was subconscious.
 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,862
0
0
I never really focused on the "honor" aspect of Corvo's actions. The morality of lethal vs non-lethal was made abundantly clear to us throughout the game but I never paid attention to how honorable my decisions were.

Thanks for this great read.
 

Two-A

New member
Aug 1, 2012
247
0
0
So it seems that Arkane did a lot more research than I thought. Thanks for the read :)

NinjaDeathSlap said:
Look at the so called 'Good' ending for example (although, again, the game never says that it's supposed to be 'good'). In this ending, after removing the conspirators on both sides, you place a child on the throne who really has no idea how to rule by herself, and the only adviser she has is you. So you have, to all intents and purposes, seized power for yourself, regardless of whether or not you also care for Emily in other ways. Does that sound 'heroic' to anybody here?
Considering Emily's the heir to the throne, the only options Corvo had after killing the loyalists was to either kill her or letting her rule. If we take into account the close relationship Corvo had with Emily (not to mention the fact that she might be his daughter), killing her is something he would never think of doing. The best course of action was to act as a councelor for her. Judging by The Outsider's narration, it's possible that Corvo never saw himself as anything as her advisor an guardian, and never thought of using her to rule the country. It may not sound heroic under normal circumstances, but it was the best course of action given the decaying state of Dunwall
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
Never mind the underhanded murdering or the knocking unconciousing, what kind of bastard waltzes into someone else's house and eats all the jellied eels?

I want to finish Dishonored without stealing anything, on top of not killing anyone or being spotted. But I think that's impossible, due to the way the game auto loots certain people that you have to pick up.
 

BiscuitTrouser

Elite Member
May 19, 2008
2,859
0
41
NinjaDeathSlap said:
I love you for this article...

You're right, it's not a perfect fit (for example, when Corvo has outlived his usefulness to the Loyalists, they try to cover their tracks not just by attempting to kill him, but by poisoning him, which is not at all the 'Gentlemanly' thing to do),
I imagine they excused that with a lovely bit of circular logic. One doesnt need to be a gentleman to someone who isnt a gentleman. Corvo lost his status as a gentleman and further ruined it by doing our dirty work. If a slave spits at them they would execute them, not duel them or offer them gentlemanly rights. The honor aspect as another side, and that is how FAR below you is the person who implied you have no honor or offended you. Do they matter? Is it even worth respecting their right to a duel? Of COURSE your slaves and servants hate you. It doesnt offend you because they are never, even for a second, meant to feel like your equal and should they offend you it doesnt matter since you own total power anyway, their symbolic resistance means nothing since it has no social status behind it. However should another gentleman imply they look down on you that is offensive because the insult comes from someone who matters and youre meant to be equals.

By poisoning corvo i think they imply that he has fallen SO far he no longer merits gentlemanly honors. He is a mere servant or slave.

The circular logic is that they dump all the dishonorable actions onto corvo THEN damn him and remove his rights as a gentleman because he commited said dishonorable actions.
 

Brainwreck

New member
Dec 2, 2012
255
0
0
Hm. Interesting. I like it particularly because it does fit very well with pretty much everything that happens in the game... but then the loyalists poison you. Hard to be more dishonourable than that. Then again, it's only dishonourable if people find out, which I guess was not the intention.
 

TKretts3

New member
Jul 20, 2010
432
0
0
Very interesting article, it really made me re-think some of the things in Dishonoured.
 

hazydawn

New member
Jan 11, 2013
237
0
0
I also wanted to thank you for this brilliant article because now I view the game in a slightly different way than I did before, or rather added meaning to the game. It was a interesting and pleasant read. :D
 

RobfromtheGulag

New member
May 18, 2010
930
0
0
3 pages? TL;DR

Ah, subjective tie-ins of real-life/history to games. Wonderfully done, in this case. It's been said above, but it's a rare treat to get an article like this when most of what we read is simply news bulletins and purely editorial content.

I wonder how this reflects on Emily's ensuing reign. Is she a trail-blazer, doing away with the caste system? Or is she (more likely from her in-game dialogue) merely ignoring Corvo's actions out of congeniality?
 

COMaestro

Vae Victis!
May 24, 2010
739
0
0
I had to skip portions of the article, as I have only finished a few levels of Dishonored and didn't want to spoil anything (which sadly happened anyway by going through these posts), but it was an excellent read. I loved seeing these cultural aspects used in the game (whether intended or just a magical lucky fit, I don't know).

I figured Corvo to be a type of nobility or upper-class as well. An empress wouldn't just send a random servant on an important courier mission unless it was something of the utmost secrecy, in which case a trusted servant may be used to deliver correspondence. But everyone seemed to know Corvo was gone and it appeared to me that he had the authority to speak for the Empress during negotiations with the foreign rulers.

It was also very interesting to see the ins and outs of the English gentleman honor system, which I knew a little bit about from other reading, but did not fully know the depths of it. Hope to see more articles like this.
 

shiajun

New member
Jun 12, 2008
576
0
0
RobfromtheGulag said:
3 pages? TL;DR

Ah, subjective tie-ins of real-life/history to games. Wonderfully done, in this case. It's been said above, but it's a rare treat to get an article like this when most of what we read is simply news bulletins and purely editorial content.

I wonder how this reflects on Emily's ensuing reign. Is she a trail-blazer, doing away with the caste system? Or is she (more likely from her in-game dialogue) merely ignoring Corvo's actions out of congeniality?
Maybe it was a joke. If it is, then ignore the following. "TL;DR" is a very rude thing to do, even if it's your own text, but moreso when it's someone else's work. One that on the next sentence you praise and highlight above buffer content. This and all of Mr. Cath's articles are essays well worth reading in full, and we should not incite cliff-notes mentality of them. Don't be that guy.
 

saintdane05

New member
Aug 2, 2011
1,849
0
0
Aristocrats? The hedonistic weirdos? Of course they have no honor!

http://youtu.be/tw10xa_xtNg?t=1m33s
 

Gunjester

New member
Mar 31, 2010
249
0
0
Corvo is not an honourable man....and PROUD!
Although it may be because I myself have Mediterranean background, I think the vendetta preserves honour far better than the English duel. Why? Because a man who wrongs your family, and challenged to a duel only fails if he is beaten. See, within the system, you dying in the duel is still more honourable than vengeance/justice for your family, which I can disagree with. A man of honour does put his honour above all else, yes, but a man who allows himself to die before paying his enemy back, rightly so I might add, has lost his honour, because he leaves a family that depends on him to perish without him, solely to preserve his image.

And that's the point isn't it? Image and Honour are not so akin as the English "Gentlemen" say it is, though what else would you expect from Elitist aristocrats who considered themselves above everyone, not just commoners, but the Gentlemen of other cultures....seriously...
 

Blunderboy

New member
Apr 26, 2011
2,223
0
0
An excellent article and a very interesting comparison.
It's also always nice to see Thomas Plunkett and the 95th Rifles crop up.
 

The Selkie

New member
May 25, 2012
58
0
0
This article caught my eye and caused me to stray away from my usual corner of the Escapist and I'm rather pleased it did. Fair play to you for the well thought out and evidently well researched article. While I picked up on a few of the things you mentioned it seems I overlooked quite a bit.

Had you approached the topic with the opinion that your interpretation was perfect I would have been somewhat reluctant in my embracing of the piece, but your acknowledgement of your interpretations limitations is rather refreshing. I'll be sure to loiter around the Critical Intel section more often.