Paragon Fury said:
I'm probably going to go deaf and mute repeating myself on this, but I'll say it anyway:
A man's penis is not important, nor a focus in male sexuality. As long as he has one, and it works, that is all that matters.
You won't ever see it focused on, because it doesn't matter.
Sorry, what?
There's a good reason why the artwork of
Tom of Finland is considered hyper-sexualised, whereas your average image of Superman is not.
Hint: it's in the bulge.
I'm guessing you're of the school of thought that an alpha-male build and plenty of muscles are what define the sexualisation of males. Sorry, no dice. If you want a man to look like a
power fantasy, you give him prominent pecks, biceps you could bend steel round and a superhero outfit. If you want a man to look like a sexual object, you show lots of skin, put emphasis on nipples and bum-cheeks, and most importantly give him some
bulge.
If the penis isn't important in a man's sexuality, why do so many men wangst about whether theirs is big enough? Why does pornograpy put an emphasis on men hung like stallions? Why is there the common idea perpetuated through our society that you need to be a hung man in order to properly satisfy a lady? I mean, it's not particularly true, but you see it implied and perpetuated in the media nonetheless.