erttheking said:
Woodsey said:
erttheking said:
Woodsey said:
erttheking said:
Woodsey said:
Religion, this 2012 business, and astrology. The usual stuff.
erttheking said:
backinthepresentfuture said:
the idea of an invisible man in the clouds that can see everything and everyone at all times, that created all that is. thats pretty batshit bonkers to me! ^_^
Do you have to be so insulting about it?
I'm sure people's various gods will instill within them the strength to persevere through such horrific persecution.
shadowkrai said:
For the whole "lol religion one", disprove that a god (not in the christian sense, just a creator) exists, then you can laugh at it, until that point, you're in the "smug c*nt" category
Burden of proof lies with the person making the claim. If I told you I could fly and then in response to you asking to prove it, I told you to disprove it, I'd hope that you'd call me an idiot.
chstens said:
DrOswald said:
chstens said:
FernandoV said:
backinthepresentfuture said:
the idea of an invisible man in the clouds that can see everything and everyone at all times, that created all that is. thats pretty batshit bonkers to me! ^_^
You're probably too into your "insufferable atheist" stage of atheism to notice BUT, the long, drawn-out analogy you are using to express that you are talking about god has been used to death. Find a new gimmick.
Okay, how about an invisible skywizard that is his own son, that sacrificed himself, to himself, to prevent that all the people he made, didn't automatically go straight to hell, without collecting their 200$, even if passing Start.
Why do you feel the need to mock religion so viciously? Your an asshole, and I am calling you out on it. You give atheists a bad name. Please stop.
I'm sorry, I don't normally mock religion, but you did ask for a "new gimmick". I will stop.
[sub](I laughed.)[/sub]
People need to learn that there is a difference between respecting other people's right to believe what they want, and respecting other people's beliefs. The former is important, the latter, not so much.
You said religion again...are you just trying to get attention now? Also, no, no I'm not buying it, that's just a throwaway excuse for you to be an insulting jerk.
No, I said religion once. I wasn't aware there are rules against having the same answers as other people. Religion doesn't get a pass just because its religion; if we're to take the piss out of 2012-ers, the Y2K people, astrologists, etc, etc, then religion can get it in the neck too.
...yeah except the 2012ers are completely crazy, even those who are religious think so, and those who believe in religion make up 90% of the planet's population...are you saying that you know better than most of the world?
Lots of people believing it doesn't lend it credence by default; what a stupid statement.
Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
"yeah except the 2012ers are completely crazy"
They make wild assumptions based on non-evidence, varying levels of paranoia and a longing for some sort of purpose in life. Sound familiar?
Yeah, you might also want to take a look at this too
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HollywoodAtheist
Here I thought that stereotype only existed in fiction but time and time again people like you prove me wrong, you must be the atheist that gives other atheists a bad name. Here's an little something to mull over, religion is recognized by most of the world governments as legitimate organizations. there's a difference between the Catholic Church and the Church of Scientology, also religion is about more than believing in a god, its about being a better person, some of the ten commandments a central part of catholic life
Thou shall honor thy mother and father
Thou shall not kill
Thou shall not steal
Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's wife
And the golden rule
Treat others the way that you would want to be treated.
Religion isn't something that can be thrown under the same blanket, Muslims aren't like Jews and Jews aren't like Christians and even Christians can be categorized as the same thing, there's too many sub cultures that fall under it, even among Catholics and Baptists, everyone takes it to a different level. Then again considering that stereotype that you fall under, you probably think that all religious people mindless worship a deity without question, throw money to the church and do what they're told to avoid some sort of punishment in the after life, I'm so offended by this that I don't even know where to begin, we are much more complex than "the world is going to end because the Mayans stopped writing their calendar."
You criticised someone for commenting on (and mocking) the Man In the Sky belief, I thought it was pretty evident that we were talking about that side of things.
"you probably think that all religious people mindless worship a deity without question"
There's a distinction between religious people and religion itself. The theistic side of religion is stupid. The other shit that you've brought up - which we weren't talking about - is irrelevant to what we are talking (and before you get to it: no, of course I don't think its a bad thing that the Bible tells people not to kill others). Yes, I would (heavily) fault someone for being religious for the theistic side. That doesn't mean I'm faulting them entirely.
For example, yy Politics teacher is religious. Outside of that, she's pretty funny, we all get along with her, she's got fairly moderate political views (a little too conservative for my taste). She's also some denomination of Christianity, and whenever religion gets brought up she sounds like a completely different person, talking about the rebirth of Christ and knowing that god is watching over her (and turning a blind-eye to the issue of politics needing to remain secular). I would fault her for that, that doesn't mean I consider her a drooling idiot who can't think for herself.
"we are much more complex than "the world is going to end because the Mayans stopped writing their calendar.""
Missing the point. The theistic side of religion (AGAIN: no, I don't care about the morals whichever holy text you read contains, that is not relevant to this discussion) and the end-of-the-world prophesising come from much the same place. A misunderstanding of what counts as evidence (or simply blind faith), unhealthy amounts of attention devoted to archaic texts, a need for some sort of purpose in life, a healthy dose of superstition and/or paranoia.