Crazy naked dude chews a man's face off

Recommended Videos

Dirty Hipsters

This is how we praise the sun!
Legacy
Feb 7, 2011
9,061
3,739
118
Country
'Merica
Gender
3 children in a trench coat
Meth is a hell of a drug.
 

Raven's Nest

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
2,954
0
41
Buretsu said:
Raven said:
I agree, they should have tazed the guy instead. The dude was clearly mentally unsound, that is not a reason to execute someone.

I'm very glad my normal police force don't carry guns... That way when they piss themselves because they are clearly undisciplined they wont open fire on anything that moves.
Yes, they should have tased the guy. That way, he could have completely shrugged it off and continued eating some dude's face. Tasers are not magical, OHKO weapons, people! And people who are COMPLETELY BATSHIT HIGH ON DRUGS to the point where they are EATING SOMEONE'S FACE OFF will not go down just because one, two, ten, twenty people are tasering him.

I hope someone tries to eat your face, and we'll see how righteously mad you can be when that someone gets shot by the police.
First of all, bolding and shouting your points don't make them any more convincing. It's obnoxious and makes your argument seem childish.

Secondly, read this report [https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/Abstract.aspx?id=246034]. The main points are that tasering is successful in it's first attempt in 69% of cases. "These findings suggest that the use of decisive force with the TASER early on in active suspect resistance is more likely than other less-lethal weapons to end the conflict quickly and thereby reduce the likelihood of additional injuries, whose rates increase as second and third applications of force (iterations) are applied.

So if several officers are present, even two or three more applications will bring someone down. There are also a whole host of non-lethal techniques that could have been used such as pepper spray, flash-bang grenades, batons etc.

That the police opened fire on an unarmed man after giving just one warning (according to the news video), then shot him four times shows that the police officer panicked and did not stop for a moment to consider alternative ways to end the conflict. Please note the officer's name was not Judge Dredd...

If you think it's acceptable for a police officer to shoot a man dead for being unarmed and engaged in a fight then I have to consider for a moment, is the police officer "bat-shit insane" or are you?
 

Corporal Yakob

New member
Nov 28, 2009
634
0
0
I read about this on Yahoo, my favourite line was "the naked man continued to chew on the victim's face despite being shot once"-ZOMBIES!!!!!!!!
 

Krion_Vark

New member
Mar 25, 2010
1,700
0
0
Pinkamena said:
rolfwesselius said:
Pinkamena said:
FelixG said:
Bahaha I could tell it was someone from Europe before I even looked at the profile.

How stereotypical.

God I hope if someone is chewing another persons face off you never are the one to come across it.
So the stereotypical European do not want policemen shooting crazy people? Well I'm ok with that. And I must say, I am not against policemen wearing and using their guns, I'm just saying that he could have stopped him in a different way, like shooting him in the legs. But given the circumstance, I guess he freaked out. I would've.
Non lethal shots are hollywood bull you either shoot to kill or you dont.
Simple as that.
Uh, no. I'm pretty sure bullets in your legs will persuade you to stop running/moving.
Hit a major artery/veins in the legs and they will bleed out before the paramedics arrive. That is why Non-lethal shots do not exist. Its not because you have lack of area for a non-lethal shot its more of oh hey I just clipped a major artery she hes dead in 30 seconds.
 

Seagoon

New member
Feb 14, 2010
411
0
0
Starik20X6 said:
PREVIOUSLY ON AMC'S 'THE WALKING DEAD'... Oh wait it's real life and happening right now and someone better keep an eye on the bitten guy.
I FUCKING LOVE YOU. NUT UP BUDDY, I'M COMING OVER TO AMERICA AND YOUR THE NEWEST EDITION THE SEAGOON AND ASSOC. ZOMBIE SLAYERS!
 

Raven's Nest

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
2,954
0
41
Mortai Gravesend said:
While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.

There is potential for crazy zombie style attacks anywhere. American police are far too trigger happy for my liking. As I said, I'm glad I don't live there.
 

bat32391

New member
Oct 19, 2011
240
0
0
Well I can't tell is this the coming zombie apocalypse of just Florida being uh.. Florida?
 

Leemaster777

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,310
0
0
Oh God, the Zombie outbreak WOULD have to start in Florida, wouldn't it? Well, I'm fucked. Nice knowing you, Escapists.

I'll try to take down as many as I can. Wait, maybe I could try swimming across the gulf to Mexico...

...holy shit, I'm contemplating escaping TO Mexico. I'm more fucked than I thought.

Captcha: out of sorts. Frighteningly accurate.
 

-Samurai-

New member
Oct 8, 2009
2,293
0
0
Raven said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.

There is potential for crazy zombie style attacks anywhere. American police are far too trigger happy for my liking. As I said, I'm glad I don't live there.
"I realize that having your face eaten is painful, but do you mind hanging out for a sec while I think of a way to capture the drugged up psycho eating your face? Thanks."

We're glad you don't live here, too.
 

Raven's Nest

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
2,954
0
41
Mortai Gravesend said:
If someone is in the process of murdering me I just want him stopped the fastest way possible. Safety for him is not my concern. I don't think the police officer should be trying anything that might not work when someone is in the process of being killed.
Perhaps... But it shouldn't be for me or you or some police officer to decide who lives and who dies.

I'd have preferred a non-lethal takedown if possible, but I wasn't there and I wasn't having my face bitten off. All I can do is question how quickly the police are to use lethal force against an unarmed man.
 

Raven's Nest

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
2,954
0
41
-Samurai- said:
Raven said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.

There is potential for crazy zombie style attacks anywhere. American police are far too trigger happy for my liking. As I said, I'm glad I don't live there.
"I realize that having your face eaten is painful, but do you mind hanging out for a sec while I think of a way to capture the drugged up psycho eating your face? Thanks."

We're glad you don't live here, too.
The use of a taser or baton doesn't require any more thinking than pulling out your firearm and using it, any trained police officer can tell you that.
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,496
1
3
Country
United States
And I just had leftover spaghetti for lunch, gross.

I knew I shouldn't have clicked the thread, but the title was so.... provocative.

Remember kids, don't do drugs, or you will be eating someone's face off!
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,087
0
0
Pinkamena said:
Why did the police have to shoot the crazy guy? Sure, he tried to attack the police, but surely there are other ways to stop him than to kill him...
While I would normally agree with you that they shouldn't have shot him in this case I think it was for the best. The man is assumed to be homeless and he was clearly mentally unstable. He would most likely have tried to bite if they got close and who knows what kind of diseases that could cause. I'm thinking along the lines of hepatitis not the T-virus.
 

-Samurai-

New member
Oct 8, 2009
2,293
0
0
Raven said:
-Samurai- said:
Raven said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.

There is potential for crazy zombie style attacks anywhere. American police are far too trigger happy for my liking. As I said, I'm glad I don't live there.
"I realize that having your face eaten is painful, but do you mind hanging out for a sec while I think of a way to capture the drugged up psycho eating your face? Thanks."

We're glad you don't live here, too.
The use of a taser or baton doesn't require any more thinking than pulling out your firearm and using it, any trained police officer can tell you that.
Then you shouldn't have a problem remembering it when you become the world finest police officer, and you happen across a psycho eating another persons face.

There isn't always time to consider an alternative. We don't live in a perfect world.
 

Dectomax

New member
Jun 17, 2010
1,761
0
0
Raven said:
All I can do is question how quickly the police are to use lethal force against an unarmed man.
Lethal force against the Unarmed-crazed-man who is currently eating someones face, ignored the officers first warning ( All the while continuing to help himself to some Nose-pie ), who completely shrugged off the first shot like the Black Knight from Monty Python? I think in that situation, any sane human being would shoot because: A. The man has just killed and EATEN someone, thus being an IMMEDIATE danger to EVERYONE and B. He's EATING a HUMAN FACE.
 

Raven's Nest

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
2,954
0
41
-Samurai- said:
Then you shouldn't have a problem remembering it when you become the world finest police officer, and you happen across a psycho eating another persons face.

There isn't always time to consider an alternative. We don't live in a perfect world.
No we don't, but we try to live in a just one. I apologise If my notion that shooting dead an unarmed man doesn't agree with your definition of it.
Dectomax said:
Lethal force against the Unarmed-crazed-man who is currently eating someones face, ignored the officers first warning ( All the while continuing to help himself to some Nose-pie ), who completely shrugged off the first shot like the Black Knight from Monty Python? I think in that situation, any sane human being would shoot because: A. The man has just killed and EATEN someone, thus being an IMMEDIATE danger to EVERYONE and B. He's EATING a HUMAN FACE.
Easy caps, I can read.

And the man didn't kill anybody. It was a horrific attack sure, but not something somebody would be given the death penalty for. I'm not excusing the crime but the guy didn't deserve death. Why is that such an impossible idea for some people?
 

Dectomax

New member
Jun 17, 2010
1,761
0
0
Raven said:
-Samurai- said:
Then you shouldn't have a problem remembering it when you become the world finest police officer, and you happen across a psycho eating another persons face.

There isn't always time to consider an alternative. We don't live in a perfect world.
No we don't, but we try to live in a just one. I apologise If my notion that shooting dead an unarmed man doesn't agree with your definition of it.
Dectomax said:
Lethal force against the Unarmed-crazed-man who is currently eating someones face, ignored the officers first warning ( All the while continuing to help himself to some Nose-pie ), who completely shrugged off the first shot like the Black Knight from Monty Python? I think in that situation, any sane human being would shoot because: A. The man has just killed and EATEN someone, thus being an IMMEDIATE danger to EVERYONE and B. He's EATING a HUMAN FACE.
Easy caps, I can read.

And the man didn't kill anybody. It was a horrific attack sure, but not something somebody would be given the death penalty for. I'm not excusing the crime but the guy didn't deserve death. Why is that such an impossible idea for some people?
Oh, he didn't kill anyone? Well, that's ok then! Dear god, what's all this moaning about?! The man didn't kill anyone...just a little nibble on someones face, no harm done! Y'know, it's only a potentially life changing action...but hey, he didn't kill anyone! Don't worry people it's all fine!

On a less sarcastic note - The man was naked, eating someone, ignored warnings and shrugged off a bullet. The Police officer was obviously slightly panicked and worried. He shot and put the man down. Potentially saving a life and stopping anyone else, let alone himself, from being injured. Yes, the crazed-cannibalistic man was shot and killed, but hey - attacking and eating someones face in public has some pretty damn serious side effects. Like death via hail of bullets from sane police officer.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,951
0
0
Hrm, better sure up the stockpiles now while theres still stock on shelves. Im mostly prepared, but you can never hoard enough
 

Chrono212

Fluttershy has a mean K:DR
May 19, 2009
1,845
0
0
No way, dude. No way!

I thought it was all silly Internet hysteria, but I read about stuff like this happening in a book, man!
A book! They don't put just anything' in a book!

I ain't saying' nothin', but those baked beans are mine! Mine, gosh darn it!

Head to the East Coast as fast as you can! Get yo bike! Got yo machete! Ain't nobody safe, bro! Nobody!

/parody