- Feb 7, 2011
- 9,061
- 3,739
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
First of all, bolding and shouting your points don't make them any more convincing. It's obnoxious and makes your argument seem childish.Buretsu said:Yes, they should have tased the guy. That way, he could have completely shrugged it off and continued eating some dude's face. Tasers are not magical, OHKO weapons, people! And people who are COMPLETELY BATSHIT HIGH ON DRUGS to the point where they are EATING SOMEONE'S FACE OFF will not go down just because one, two, ten, twenty people are tasering him.Raven said:I agree, they should have tazed the guy instead. The dude was clearly mentally unsound, that is not a reason to execute someone.
I'm very glad my normal police force don't carry guns... That way when they piss themselves because they are clearly undisciplined they wont open fire on anything that moves.
I hope someone tries to eat your face, and we'll see how righteously mad you can be when that someone gets shot by the police.
Hit a major artery/veins in the legs and they will bleed out before the paramedics arrive. That is why Non-lethal shots do not exist. Its not because you have lack of area for a non-lethal shot its more of oh hey I just clipped a major artery she hes dead in 30 seconds.Pinkamena said:Uh, no. I'm pretty sure bullets in your legs will persuade you to stop running/moving.rolfwesselius said:Non lethal shots are hollywood bull you either shoot to kill or you dont.Pinkamena said:So the stereotypical European do not want policemen shooting crazy people? Well I'm ok with that. And I must say, I am not against policemen wearing and using their guns, I'm just saying that he could have stopped him in a different way, like shooting him in the legs. But given the circumstance, I guess he freaked out. I would've.FelixG said:Bahaha I could tell it was someone from Europe before I even looked at the profile.
How stereotypical.
God I hope if someone is chewing another persons face off you never are the one to come across it.
Simple as that.
I FUCKING LOVE YOU. NUT UP BUDDY, I'M COMING OVER TO AMERICA AND YOUR THE NEWEST EDITION THE SEAGOON AND ASSOC. ZOMBIE SLAYERS!Starik20X6 said:PREVIOUSLY ON AMC'S 'THE WALKING DEAD'... Oh wait it's real life and happening right now and someone better keep an eye on the bitten guy.
My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.Mortai Gravesend said:While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
"I realize that having your face eaten is painful, but do you mind hanging out for a sec while I think of a way to capture the drugged up psycho eating your face? Thanks."Raven said:My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.Mortai Gravesend said:While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
There is potential for crazy zombie style attacks anywhere. American police are far too trigger happy for my liking. As I said, I'm glad I don't live there.
Perhaps... But it shouldn't be for me or you or some police officer to decide who lives and who dies.Mortai Gravesend said:If someone is in the process of murdering me I just want him stopped the fastest way possible. Safety for him is not my concern. I don't think the police officer should be trying anything that might not work when someone is in the process of being killed.
The use of a taser or baton doesn't require any more thinking than pulling out your firearm and using it, any trained police officer can tell you that.-Samurai- said:"I realize that having your face eaten is painful, but do you mind hanging out for a sec while I think of a way to capture the drugged up psycho eating your face? Thanks."Raven said:My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.Mortai Gravesend said:While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
There is potential for crazy zombie style attacks anywhere. American police are far too trigger happy for my liking. As I said, I'm glad I don't live there.
We're glad you don't live here, too.
While I would normally agree with you that they shouldn't have shot him in this case I think it was for the best. The man is assumed to be homeless and he was clearly mentally unstable. He would most likely have tried to bite if they got close and who knows what kind of diseases that could cause. I'm thinking along the lines of hepatitis not the T-virus.Pinkamena said:Why did the police have to shoot the crazy guy? Sure, he tried to attack the police, but surely there are other ways to stop him than to kill him...
Then you shouldn't have a problem remembering it when you become the world finest police officer, and you happen across a psycho eating another persons face.Raven said:The use of a taser or baton doesn't require any more thinking than pulling out your firearm and using it, any trained police officer can tell you that.-Samurai- said:"I realize that having your face eaten is painful, but do you mind hanging out for a sec while I think of a way to capture the drugged up psycho eating your face? Thanks."Raven said:My problem is that the police shot an unarmed man. If this were to happen in a place where regular police officers don't carry guns, the police officer would have found another method of taking him down without killing him. But as far as I know this police officer didn't even try.Mortai Gravesend said:While I didn't really care to listen to the news video(watched it to see if actual footage came up and it didn't) the article I read mentioned that he told the guy to back away from the other guy and when he didn't stop eating him he shot him. Considering he's biting off the other guy's face I think shooting him at that point is justified, the other guy's life is in danger. Though not sure which would be more accurate the article or the video.
There is potential for crazy zombie style attacks anywhere. American police are far too trigger happy for my liking. As I said, I'm glad I don't live there.
We're glad you don't live here, too.
Lethal force against the Unarmed-crazed-man who is currently eating someones face, ignored the officers first warning ( All the while continuing to help himself to some Nose-pie ), who completely shrugged off the first shot like the Black Knight from Monty Python? I think in that situation, any sane human being would shoot because: A. The man has just killed and EATEN someone, thus being an IMMEDIATE danger to EVERYONE and B. He's EATING a HUMAN FACE.Raven said:All I can do is question how quickly the police are to use lethal force against an unarmed man.
No we don't, but we try to live in a just one. I apologise If my notion that shooting dead an unarmed man doesn't agree with your definition of it.-Samurai- said:Then you shouldn't have a problem remembering it when you become the world finest police officer, and you happen across a psycho eating another persons face.
There isn't always time to consider an alternative. We don't live in a perfect world.
Easy caps, I can read.Dectomax said:Lethal force against the Unarmed-crazed-man who is currently eating someones face, ignored the officers first warning ( All the while continuing to help himself to some Nose-pie ), who completely shrugged off the first shot like the Black Knight from Monty Python? I think in that situation, any sane human being would shoot because: A. The man has just killed and EATEN someone, thus being an IMMEDIATE danger to EVERYONE and B. He's EATING a HUMAN FACE.
Oh, he didn't kill anyone? Well, that's ok then! Dear god, what's all this moaning about?! The man didn't kill anyone...just a little nibble on someones face, no harm done! Y'know, it's only a potentially life changing action...but hey, he didn't kill anyone! Don't worry people it's all fine!Raven said:No we don't, but we try to live in a just one. I apologise If my notion that shooting dead an unarmed man doesn't agree with your definition of it.-Samurai- said:Then you shouldn't have a problem remembering it when you become the world finest police officer, and you happen across a psycho eating another persons face.
There isn't always time to consider an alternative. We don't live in a perfect world.Easy caps, I can read.Dectomax said:Lethal force against the Unarmed-crazed-man who is currently eating someones face, ignored the officers first warning ( All the while continuing to help himself to some Nose-pie ), who completely shrugged off the first shot like the Black Knight from Monty Python? I think in that situation, any sane human being would shoot because: A. The man has just killed and EATEN someone, thus being an IMMEDIATE danger to EVERYONE and B. He's EATING a HUMAN FACE.
And the man didn't kill anybody. It was a horrific attack sure, but not something somebody would be given the death penalty for. I'm not excusing the crime but the guy didn't deserve death. Why is that such an impossible idea for some people?