People need to get a life, and by people I mean the author of this article. I don't care as long as the movie is entertaining and is somewhat connected to the games.
That character was based on the <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Ultimate>Marvel Ultimate Fury, who was based on (guess!) Samuel L. Jackson. It's a different character from the classic Marvel 616 Fury.BarbaricGoose said:No one ever complains about Blackwashing.. Like when Samuel L. Jackson was cast as Nick Fury?
Tell that to the ladies. I will amuse myself while they rip you apart with their razor sharp fangs.SteelStallion said:What? Jake isn't known at all, he's only been a supporting actor in a few movies. He's never carried a lead role in a significant movie, let alone a summer blockbuster.Andy Chalk said:While there's no doubt some merit to the complaint, I think it's also fair to suggest that Gyllenhaal was given the role in large part because he's a known commodity who can carry a summer blockbuster.
Oh come on, be fair.Hurr Durr Derp said:That character was based on the <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Ultimate>Marvel Ultimate Fury, who was based on (guess!) Samuel L. Jackson. It's a different character from the classic Marvel 616 Fury.BarbaricGoose said:No one ever complains about Blackwashing.. Like when Samuel L. Jackson was cast as Nick Fury?
OT: I dunno. On the one hand, a good story doesn't stop being good if the main character's skin color is different. On the other hand, examples like The Last Airbender are pretty damn blatant.
http://cdn.mqstatic.com/files/alwayswatching/images/1101.jpg
Personally I was joking.Eldritch Warlord said:Good to see that people never read these threads.
Me and another person have already explained the very relevant historical reason for an ancient Persian prince being played by a white actor.
It's funny that you should mention those examples. First of all, the Nick Fury thing is a non-issue, as I explained in my earlier post.Therumancer said:#1: Why is this only a factor when it's a white guy taking the role(s)? Let's be honest over the years we've seen situations where we've replaced Marvel Comic's "Kingpin of Crime" and DC Comic's "Harvey Dent" with black guys, and very few people made serious complaints other comic purists who wanted the characters to be more like the comic originals. The most recent example of this that I can think of off the top of my head was again from a comic movie series, where people have been casting Samual L. Jackson as "Nick Fury" in most of the current marvel movies.
Donnie Darko, The Lovely Girl, The Good Girl, Bubble Boy, Jarhead, Brokeback Montain, etc etc etc.SteelStallion said:What? Jake isn't known at all, he's only been a supporting actor in a few movies. He's never carried a lead role in a significant movie, let alone a summer blockbuster.Andy Chalk said:While there's no doubt some merit to the complaint, I think it's also fair to suggest that Gyllenhaal was given the role in large part because he's a known commodity who can carry a summer blockbuster.
Fury in the movies is the Ultimate version of Fury. The Ult. Fury looks exactly like Jackson.Therumancer said:The most recent example of this that I can think of off the top of my head was again from a comic movie series, where people have been casting Samual L. Jackson as "Nick Fury" in most of the current marvel movies.
i thought so too but i guess notCheesebob said:Isn't the Prince white in the games?