Critical Miss: #29

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
You're right. That is the best Kraken ever. Even better than the Kraken from Shining Force 2. This is the Kraken that should've been released.

...please don't make me say the line...
 

Yokai

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,982
0
0
Yay, more corporations putting legal nonsense and the chance of making extra money in front of morality and compassion. Great comic though. That's pretty much how I imagine Bobby Kotick. Although I always pictured him as more of a giant spider guy.
 

Seydaman

New member
Nov 21, 2008
2,494
0
0
Wasn't the only reason she got sued because she was charging people?
Private servers that run for free aren't illegal I believe, or there's some special thingy they have to do, like two patches behind I think.
 

Tolerant Fanboy

New member
Aug 5, 2009
339
0
0
Furthermore, at least one (1) unicorn should be at least fifty (50) percent robotic, electronic, or similarly cybernetic in nature, leave a rainbow effect in its wake, and be capable of charges that can destroy at least one (1) giant star crystal per charge. A negotiable number of butterfly fairies and/or sky dolphins can reduce the stringency of these requirements.
 

Optimystic

New member
Sep 24, 2008
723
0
0
I don't have a lot of sympathy for that lady. Running a private server I don't see the harm in, but if you want to charge people for stuff, invent your own damn game.
 

The Wooster

King Snap
Jul 15, 2008
15,305
0
0
Optimystic said:
I don't have a lot of sympathy for that lady. Running a private server I don't see the harm in, but if you want to charge people for stuff, invent your own damn game.
Agreed. My biggest worry is that this case sets a precedent that could affect cases involving pirate servers for games without monthly fees, I touched on that in the strip.

Running a pirate WOW server is a clear cut case of good/bad but how about running a Modern Warfare 2 server or any other game that dissalows dedicated servers.
 

Hexenwolf

Senior Member
Sep 25, 2008
820
0
21
See, the thing is, if you owe them three krakens and half a griffin, who cares? If you owe them 88 billion dollars, then you have crushing debt for the rest of your life.
 

WhizEd

New member
Aug 21, 2009
25
0
0
The depiction of Kotick in panel 5 is possibly the funniest thing I've ever seen.
He reminds me of the Pokemon Slowpoke, for some reason.
Keep up the great work.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
RobCoxxy said:
Mr. Grey said:
Grouchy Imp said:
Hah, like Bobby Kotick would demand a Kraken when he could ask for a huge pile of stones to squeeze the blood out of! Good point about the woman Blizzard took to court too, how in the world is she ever gonna be able to pay back even a percentage of that?
Why! With her great great great grandkids, of course! They'll pick up the tab when she's long dead.
I wonder what the Dollars -> Bottlecaps exchange rate is.
One fat stack of bills is worth 10 bottlecaps according to Fallout 3.

It should be noted that the average college graduate only makes about 1 million USD over the course of their lives.
 

Optimystic

New member
Sep 24, 2008
723
0
0
Grey Carter said:
Optimystic said:
I don't have a lot of sympathy for that lady. Running a private server I don't see the harm in, but if you want to charge people for stuff, invent your own damn game.
Agreed. My biggest worry is that this case sets a precedent that could affect cases involving pirate servers for games without monthly fees, I touched on that in the strip.

Running a pirate WOW server is a clear cut case of good/bad but how about running a Modern Warfare 2 server or any other game that dissalows dedicated servers.
Perhaps... Personally, I think the only clear-cut "bad" here is profiting from said server-running, as making money off someone else's property is clearly unjust enrichment.

Would she have been as in the wrong if she were doing it for free though? And I know, running servers isn't cheap, but she would have at least had the defense that this was a recreational venture and not a commercial one. A-B would have looked then even more fiendish than they already do.

But that would mean: no donations, no fees, no microtransactions, no accepting revenue of any kind from her guests - not unless she's willing to publish statements proving that all the money goes purely to upkeep, which would tip her hand anyway.

So I guess I'm asking - if someone were to host a private server like this just to play with their friends away from the stresses of the general population, and footed the bill entirely out of pocket, would that person be just as wrong? And this goes for any kind of multiplayer game that would benefit from a dedicated server, not just MMOs.
 

Ghengis John

New member
Dec 16, 2007
2,209
0
0
I have a bit of trouble sympathizing for acti-blizzard in this instance. I was acquainted with a couple of their employees. Their Christmases were disgusting. They'ed spend more on overpriced designer shit for their dogs than people working minimum wage make in a year. And it would all be under the little tree. The big tree was... an insult to reason. A necklace wasn't good enough, it had to be the one some actress actually wore in some movie his wife liked. Just pouring money down the drain. Every time I'd ask them about their priorities I'd get the old "Well it's my money" speech. Understandable?. I guess that's what I'd tell myself if I were in his shoes, sure. But then again I come from a different reality and wouldn't spend my money like I was a drug dealer. I'm not saying there wasn't any element of jealousy, but there was certainly more to it than that. How anyone could spend their money like that in their own little bubble universe while ignoring the suffering of people around them and still consider themselves a good person ate at me until I guess I just didn't want to know them anymore. There's this quote from Jesus about it being harder for a rich man to get into heaven than it is to get a camel through the eye of a needle. I used to think it was because they had to step on a lot of people to get where they were, I know better now.

That said, I do feel a little bad for this woman, but she had to go and make a business out of it. That was just stupid. I also don't know what she thought not appearing in court would do for her. The verdict is of course, still highly ridiculous.

Funny comic. All said.