This man was clearly not young enough the time of release of this game to be terrified by the regenerators.The Real Sandman said:This. This visual metaphor of a person ingesting human fecal matter via a sandwich sums it up.
It really shocked at first me how much hate RE4 got from fans. "Oh never mind the the ridiculously improved controls, interface, puzzles, and pacing, THEY RUINED TEH STORY AND MAED IT IN2 A SHOOTER!"
"Ruined the story"? Yeah, the story was already ruined the by the time RE3 was released and before that it was cheesier than a Voltron episode draped in fondue. While not great or original, RE4's story was very enjoyable to me. On accounts that it had practically nothing to do with the original (bat shit insane) cannon and it went about things deliberately self aware. With the added bonuses of likable protagonists, some funny lines of dialog, and a coherent and easy to follow plot and you got yourself a very well executed story.
However, one thing I'll disagree with is the huge praise RE4 gets for its horror. Its pretty scary around the beginning, but once you find the shotgun and some grenades, then it becomes an extremely weird shooter. That didn't bother me (were still some parts that creeped the shit outa me), it was still fun as hell at least! But when people say "past RE game were scarier and more atmospheric", that's just not true. Yeah you can say how RE pioneered the horror genre, but all the games pretty much relied on jump out scares and surprise attacks as opposed to true psychological endurance as practiced by Silent Hill 2 and Condemned: Criminal Origins. Besides, a game/movie/book/whatever can be as atmospheric as possible, but if it has a completely retarded and convoluted story and characters you want to flog every time they open their mouths, then everything just falls apart because we can't connect with situation due to it's inconsistencies and lack of any logic.
Seems to sum it up pretty well.The Real Sandman said:This. This visual metaphor of a person ingesting human fecal matter via a sandwich sums it up.
It really shocked at first me how much hate RE4 got from fans. "Oh never mind the the ridiculously improved controls, interface, puzzles, and pacing, THEY RUINED TEH STORY AND MAED IT IN2 A SHOOTER!"
"Ruined the story"? Yeah, the story was already ruined the by the time RE3 was released and before that it was cheesier than a Voltron episode draped in fondue. While not great or original, RE4's story was very enjoyable to me. On accounts that it had practically nothing to do with the original (bat shit insane) cannon and it went about things deliberately self aware. With the added bonuses of likable protagonists, some funny lines of dialog, and a coherent and easy to follow plot and you got yourself a very well executed story.
However, one thing I'll disagree with is the huge praise RE4 gets for its horror. Its pretty scary around the beginning, but once you find the shotgun and some grenades, then it becomes an extremely weird shooter. That didn't bother me (were still some parts that creeped the shit outa me), it was still fun as hell at least! But when people say "past RE game were scarier and more atmospheric", that's just not true. Yeah you can say how RE pioneered the horror genre, but all the games pretty much relied on jump out scares and surprise attacks as opposed to true psychological endurance as practiced by Silent Hill 2 and Condemned: Criminal Origins. Besides, a game/movie/book/whatever can be as atmospheric as possible, but if it has a completely retarded and convoluted story and characters you want to flog every time they open their mouths, then everything just falls apart because we can't connect with situation due to it's inconsistencies and lack of any logic.
I don't really know about that, I think it's just affectionate parody more than anything, given that it was done in parody week and all.Grey Carter said:You know, I always hated that image. A comic like XKCD which is full of obscure smug-ass math jokes attacking PA for being inaccessable? Ironeh.QuadFish said:I think this is relevant.Sneaklemming said:It beats penny arcade anyday.QuadFish said:Anyway, since I'm never early enough in these comments, I'd like to take the opportunity to say that this is actually my favourite webcomic ever. Of all time. In the universe.
Hey another who played RE4 first. I never played the others though. I ditched the game shortly after the escort stuff ended and I realized I was just not enjoying this game at all (I'm slow like that, I'm always thinking that maybe I'll get into it after this next bit).Ashcrexl said:i am fortunate that Resi4 was my first. though i still managed to enjoy the others, especially Resi2, though obviously it's nowhere near the level of awesome that was Resi4.
You're preaching to the choir here buddy - I love penny arcade - I just love critical miss more.tyriless said:Not a fan of P.A. I take it. If so that's ok, but your engaging in hyperbole none-the-less. Day-to-day Penny Arcade can be less stellar then other times but when you have a gem like thisSneaklemming said:It beats penny arcade anyday.QuadFish said:Anyway, since I'm never early enough in these comments, I'd like to take the opportunity to say that this is actually my favourite webcomic ever. Of all time. In the universe.
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/8/11/
then the it skews the average into the stratosphere.
This was a good comic today. It makes a strong argument for the origin of seemingly senseless internet bitching.
The controls before RE4 sucked, and the writing/dialogue was so cheesy it was hard to take seriously as a horror game. Hence, RE4 was not a true horror game, but the ones before it weren't either, contrary to fanboy claims.QuadFish said:Well I thought I'd learned enough about RE before you posted that. Now I'm just confused... how many hands do you have?RelexCryo said:All Resident Evils before 4 had a very, very bad control scheme similar to how you move tanks(or they were rail shooters.) It turned a LOT of people off to the game. Those who stuck with the game despite it generally didn't like it. By contrast, Resident Evil 4's control scheme was excellent. On the other hand, RE 4 was really more of an action game than a horror title, which is why some people disliked it. On the other, other hand, saying that Resident Evil was ever a horror game is somewhat misleading- You had less ammo and faced desperation fairly often, but the writing, voice acting and such were all so horrible that it was hard to take it seriously.QuadFish said:I can't say I've played enough RE to really know what you're getting at. Isn't RE4 meant to be like that sandwich that has some extra mayonnaise on it because the chef loves you?
On another note, seems it pays to be up at 2:00 some days
EDIT: That soda can seems VERY familiar...
One hopes you do anyway. Yours is a no-content post. *exaculates an evil Price-ean laugh*blalien said:Thanks, I could have lived without a comic about a man eating human excrement.
If I had posted this in a thread, I would have gotten probation.
The new X-Com. Even the people complaining say it looks interesting, it's just not a real X-Com game. And it's not. But it'd be very difficult to launch as an original IP, so they they called it X-Com.Therumancer said:One of the problems I have with franchises today is that the reluctance to launch new franchises has lead to the mutilation of long-standing series. People slapping the name of, and a sequel number to, games that have absolutly nothing to do with a series except perhaps using some of the same characters and referances to the setting. Resident Evil 4 was an example of this, sure it involved Leon, but at the same time it didn't use "real" Zombies as per the previous games, there was little need for ammo conservation, and rather than puzzles and trying to work out ways to avoid monsters the entire game was largely based around shooting your way through everything (for which there is plenty of ammo, in previous games there simply wasn't enough bang-bang at various points in the game to make this a viable solution). They literally put you into closed arenas like villages and such and won't let
you progress until you kill every bloody thing there.
None of that makes it a bad game, but it does mean it's not a "Resident Evil" game. It also means that fans of the series do have a right to complain about it. I don't think in cases like this it's general internet "moan about everything".
I think its more like, the other RE games were good, but had lots of shit in it, and then RE4 came out without any shit. But because it doesnt contain said shit, its not the same so the guy rages regardlessQuadFish said:I can't say I've played enough RE to really know what you're getting at. Isn't RE4 meant to be like that sandwich that has some extra mayonnaise on it because the chef loves you?
I think you missed my "EDIT EDIT", good sir.w1ndscar said:I think its more like, the other RE games were good, but had lots of shit in it, and then RE4 came out without any shit. But because it doesnt contain said shit, its not the same so the guy rages regardlessQuadFish said:I can't say I've played enough RE to really know what you're getting at. Isn't RE4 meant to be like that sandwich that has some extra mayonnaise on it because the chef loves you?
QuadFish said:My apologies, I assumed that the EDIT EDIT referred to the original EDIT.w1ndscar said:I think its more like, the other RE games were good, but had lots of shit in it, and then RE4 came out without any shit. But because it doesnt contain said shit, its not the same so the guy rages regardlessQuadFish said:I can't say I've played enough RE to really know what you're getting at. Isn't RE4 meant to be like that sandwich that has some extra mayonnaise on it because the chef loves you?
I think you missed my "EDIT EDIT", good sir.