SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
SomeBoredGuy said:
Woodsey said:
Its 2 months later, I don't give a shit. Should have been in with the game.
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
This. Crytek can go fuck themselves, they spend months talking about how this game would ship with DX11 and how it would use it to its fullest potential... Fuck them. I didnt even buy the piece of shit and as soon as I heard about DX11 and mod support being left out I was glad I didnt.
EDIT: And another one:
ImprovizoR said:
No one cares anymore. People are still playing Crysis 1 and Warhead SP rather than Crysis 2 SP or MP. And that has nothing to do with Dx11. It's just a shit game on PC.
OT: While I don't have a DX11-capable computer, this is definitely good news to my ears since it means that those who do can now get their money's worth on their fancy hardware.
Although, as good as Crysis 2 is, they really need to increase the range of Nanovision. Maybe not quite to the point of the demo, but definitely to the point where it becomes an effective counter to cloak.
If not liking a bad game (debatable and a matter of opinion) and telling a dev to fuck off when they promise things they dont keep and give the finger to the community that is the reason the company is where it is now (not debatable, fact) makes me a hater, then color me one.
Just a question for you though, since you seem to be perfectly fine with all this, what is your opinion on the matter? Did they do a good thing? Is saying "The game will ship with DX11 support (btw look at what it can do) and a mod kit", then shipping the game with neither, good practice that is to be applauded? In short, do you like devs to outright lie into your face?
I'll be honest. I wasn't a big fan of Crysis at the time Crysis 2 was launched. I just finished the first game and am considering getting the second. I wasn't around for this "crysis"... yes, a bad pun i know... but my take on the situation is this... I'd be "ok" with a computer game shipping without a feature it had advertised, IF, I knew it'd be added later in a patch for free. IMO, it's slightly better then an outright game delay... but only marginally. That's why i have ""'s around OK. Not really keen on the idea, but it's IMO the better of the two evils.
Now, it seems they promised this feature, didn't deliver,and lets be frank, this happens i'm afraid, and it isn't nessissarly a LIE per say, just a promise they couldn't keep in the time frame alotted. And lets be honest, I've promised people things, then couldn't deliver, for a veriaty of reason, some of which were *completely* out of my control. I'd assume we all have. That isn't to say they shouldn't make up for it... which they seem to be... I wouldn't nessisserly be happy about the situation, but if it was a good game, i'd prolly still by it. *shrug*
And that begs the question, since i don't own Crysis 2 yet, besides this insident, how's the game compaired to the first, in a game play since? (honest question, on the fence about getting it or not, would like a gameplay assemement, ignoring THIS issues as it isn't relevent to me personally.)