You really didn't catch it in my last post?Mazty said:
Alright, here's what I've been trying to say: I don't care.
Plain and simple.
Crysis 2 Will Be "Similar" On 360, PS3
- Thread starter Andy Chalk
- Start date
Alright, here's what I've been trying to say: I don't care.
Plain and simple.
It is a bit. Changing the gun attachment would be a bit more annoying on the 360 (although that can probably be solved with a menu screen instead of holding your weapon in front of you like in the original). Also, it's quite difficult to change the suit modes with the 360 controller, partially because it was never designed to and part because the only way to do it is with the thumbstick, difficult whilst moving.Geo Da Sponge said:
That said, good design can fix all these problem easily.
For Crysis, taking away the top graphics is dumbing down since that's about all there is to the game apart from a pretense to realism. Not that it's bad, but apart from graphics and suit it's not very special.
Edit: noticed necro, feel free to ignore.
Haha.Mazty said:
Oh, ok. Let me rephrase that: NOBODY cares. Aaaannnddd THAT's what I've been trying to say, yet after FOUR posts you STILL don't seem to understand.
Nope, you just keep saying rather IRONIC things, like: "Hmmph, the PS3 is better, and until you understand that, you're being childish.
Bah, grow up" Your posts make me lol a little bit, as you say that I don't care about explosions in FPS, while what I'm saying is that I don't care about your reasons for the PS3 being SUPREME.
Advice: Learn to understand posts
Advice: Stop calling the adults "CHILDISH" kid.
Advice: Don't give advice to someone you absolutely don't know.
Ok, attempt number 6...Mazty said:
Nobody cares about your reasons for the PS3 being superior.
There. That's what I think. Now stop it. Be a good little boy.
Is it really that hard to understand? Do you even speak English?
Besides that, you don't know me, so stop calling everyone a little kid. I guarantee that if you saw me while I was working, you'd show me respect. That's what makes me laugh the most when I'm on the forums, how easy it is for people to insult behind a computer screen. Stop trying to make it PERSONAL. Spare yourself the embarassment.
Why on earth would they hope that Crysis 2 will take even less time to complete than the original? That's completely ridiculous. The first one was really short, and they decide to make the next one shorter, good move. I'm almost considering not giving them my money now.
One question comes to my mind: Why isn´t Crytek also releasing Crysis 1 on the 360 / PS3?
Would be pretty useful for people who were not able to play it because their PC´s were not good enough.
I played through it and WARHEAD and boy, am I glad I did. But isnt it stupid if some console players have to start in the middle of the trilogy? That would be like starting with "Halo 2" or watching "LotR:The two Towers" first. You might say that "there is no story in Crysis", but it would still fell as if you missed something, right?
Crytek has ported Farcry to consoles, so why don´t do the same with Crysis?
Yes, Farcry wasn´t really the same, but still. Has Crytek even given any statement as to why they wont port it to consoles?
The end of WARHEAD on the airfield was just... whoa... more than epic.
Would be pretty useful for people who were not able to play it because their PC´s were not good enough.
I played through it and WARHEAD and boy, am I glad I did. But isnt it stupid if some console players have to start in the middle of the trilogy? That would be like starting with "Halo 2" or watching "LotR:The two Towers" first. You might say that "there is no story in Crysis", but it would still fell as if you missed something, right?
Crytek has ported Farcry to consoles, so why don´t do the same with Crysis?
Yes, Farcry wasn´t really the same, but still. Has Crytek even given any statement as to why they wont port it to consoles?
Amen and... amen.SultanP said:
The end of WARHEAD on the airfield was just... whoa... more than epic.
Hm... I dont know if I would call them "something else", but the proportions, the atmosphere and the visuals were just stunning.Mornelithe said:
Your posts are so hypocritical.Mazty said:
Haha you're telling me I have anger issues when you're actually going through all my posts, even calling me a troll in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with this one, or you.
DON'T take the internet to heart. Get a life. And no, I absolutely guarentee you that you would show me respects on the streets. If not I'd lay you out and take your ass in, simple as that.
And yours aren't? Really now? I can sum this up in one line.SendMeNoodz84 said:
That seems kind of hypocritical to me. Also, from what you put in your bio, (I'll assume that it's true) you seem to be under the false impression that respect in real life should transfer over to the internet, where as you say, nobody knows who you are. I also believe that you are mistaking respect for a position with respect for you personally. That's the great thing about the internet, what you type is all that matters. If you type like a kid, people will take it that you are really one. From your posts I'd say your maturity level is around 15 years old or so.SendMeNoodz84 said:
OT: Some people do care if the graphics are different because some people are nerds like that. I mean that in an entirely un-offensive way as I am a huge nerd myself. Like audiophiles there are people that get gaga over these small changes in graphics because they care. Saying nobody cares is a sweeping generalization.
Well I'm done talking to you, as you don't seem to understand what I'm saying.Mazty said:
Have a nice life.