D.I.C.E. 2013: J.J. Abrams and Gabe Newell Tease Portal Movie

Thamian

New member
Sep 3, 2008
143
0
0
Ok, what the fuck did this guy do to somehow get nominated to rule all of geekdom? Ok he's done a lot of stuff, but none of it was particularly groundbreaking or even interesting really, and certainly nothing which would warrant him having that degree of creative power.

Indeed, about the only thing I can think of is broadening the appeal of Star Trek to more mainstream audiences... Oh I see. Yeah. Forgot that the ability to target as many audiences as possible mattersto the fucknuts in charge, not making something that's actually decent.

And they also seem to be hell bent on continuing to ignore that other directors manage to do both. But then I remember that Joss Whedon doesn't count because he only makes TV shows which fail in short order, Matthew Vaughn doesn't because he only ever makes British gangster movies, Zack Synder doesn't because only his adaptations ever sell and even those not that well, Del Toro's a hopeless, over-ambitious optimist, and Edgar Wright's only good for British comedy.

Fucking narrow-minded idiots...
 

ryo02

New member
Oct 8, 2007
819
0
0
I dont see why these games need movies about them at all frankly they portray the half life/portal world/story better than any movie ever would.
 

deathbydeath

New member
Jun 28, 2010
1,363
0
0
jFr[e said:
ak93]OT - I honestly think this is a really cool idea. For Portal. Not Half-Life. Keep him away from that. But Portal? His aesthetics in Star Trek would line up with Portal perfectly.

Really Portal would make an awesome movie.
Portal is a game about subtleties. Well, the first one at least. What about ST09 was subtle? It was a loud and flashy beast that certainly had some cool moments, but was overflowing with noise and yelling and explosions. Sure it wasn't "bad", but the only parts that I thought were good were the ones with Leonard Nimoy in them. That man should not be given control of any film version of a Valve IP.
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
revjay said:
Starring chris pine as a lump of plaster and they could make GlaDoS completely out of lens flare. Please Gabe show some restraint and don't do this? Please?
"Make GLaDOS completely out of lens flare" made me laugh. :D
 

Eddie451

Minor Jr. Pvt. -1st Class
Apr 4, 2010
36
0
0
This will never happen, Valve has made it clear on many occasions that the only way they will do a movie is in-house using their own creative skill and wont loan out their ips to be turned into movies.
 

uchytjes

New member
Mar 19, 2011
969
0
0
I still don't understand why people hate J J Abrams. Sure his movies aren't "ZOMG ITS TEH BEST THIS EVAR" but thats just it: Amazing movies don't happen ALL THE TIME. At least he is consistent in providing movies that are fun to watch, even if they are forgettable at times.

Also, I honestly hope he has learned from all the internet rage that he does in fact use far too much lens flare and hope he will correct that in his upcoming movies.
 

Beryl77

New member
Mar 26, 2010
1,599
0
0
It would be interesting to see a Half-Life movie about the Seven Hour War. Obviously it's not going to be about our dear physicist but there's a lot of background story in Half-Life that they could use, same with Portal. I'm pretty excited about the potential video game as well.
Hollywood has made multiple offers to Valve for a Half-Life movie but they've turned them all down because all the ideas were terrible according to Mr. Newell. They must have some really good ideas to consider this. I think the biggest problem was that Hollywood doesn't really know Half-Life well and considering Hollywood's history with video game movies, that doesn't surprise me at all. However, J.J. Abrams is a fan of Valve and Half-Life if I recall correctly, so he probably knows how to make a proper Half-Life movie.
Well, I'm certainly interested.
 

Nurb

Cynical bastard
Dec 9, 2008
3,078
0
0
But the game is a mute solving puzzles with a taunting robot in a sterile facility, how can you make a movie out of that? Half-life would be a better option since other characters could do the speaking. I think I'd like a silent Freeman through a whole movie.
 

Not Matt

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2011
555
0
21
Gaben, J.J. Come here, i wanna show you something. these are a few of the good videogames that got a movie.
not to mention the uncharted movie which isn't made (thank god) yet (s**t). where drake and his family travel around solving agrological crimes

.......feel good about that? feel good about what you said about GLados and gordon and chell?

please don't do this. i know how self intitled we sound saying this but. DO NOT MAKE THE MOVIE.........[small]pretty please[/small]
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
19,653
4,452
118
Let's all enjoy the freak out, shall we.

Maestro, some music please...


In the meantime let's take a shot evertime somone makes a lens flare joke.
 

Sigmund Av Volsung

Hella noided
Dec 11, 2009
2,999
0
0
DAMNIT JJ!
WHAT DID I TELL YOU ABOUT STAYING AWAY FROM THE THINGS I LIKE!

This just makes me sad, is Disney AND Valve so blind that they can't even see past the lens flares?

Also I have a niggling feeling that this will be like the Super Mario Bros. movie all over again.

Freeman and Chell deserve better than this...
 

Steve the Pocket

New member
Mar 30, 2009
1,649
0
0
Encaen said:
During the keynote, both men made their biases of medium pretty clear. Where Newell was naturally in favor of the free agency provided by videogames, Abrams was more critical of the unfocused nature of storytelling through games. "It's under the player's control how much of this world they're going to explore," said Newell. Where Abrams' thoughts are that "players are often driving the scene in the wrong direction."
Oh joy, he's one of those people. Look, while I'll be the first to admit that Valve pioneered the linear, setpiece-driven style of game design that's become the norm in recent years, they still know how to make games where the player feels like they're in control as opposed to more recent games that have turned into "guided tours" broken up by brief periods of actual gameplay. Valve doesn't need an actual filmmaker telling them that video games need to be even more like movies. I don't care if it's Peter Jackson saying this stuff; they do not know what they're talking about.

I'd be fine with a Half-Life movie directed by Abrams if Valve's own writers are still involved in the screenplay. As Moviebob pointed out, Abrams has a tendency to play it very safe and not try to do anything out-of-the-box, while Valve enjoys swerving in completely unexpected directions and blowing the player's mind, especially in recent years. A movie written by those people but reined in by someone with more experience directing live action (practically anyone will do) would be amazing.
 

MarsProbe

Circuitboard Seahorse
Dec 13, 2008
2,372
0
0
Personally I can't see this happening. Not that I don't specifically want to see a JJ Abrams Portal movie, I just don't think I want to see a Portal movie at all. Though if they must, if they could at least work in Cave Johnson warning in his usual fashion about the overuse of lens flare in a particular test chamber, I'd be fine with that.

Oh, and somewhere in this thread someone made a comment about Armageddon being a mediocre movie. Well, they're wrong, and mad.
 

Sigmund Av Volsung

Hella noided
Dec 11, 2009
2,999
0
0
uchytjes said:
I still don't understand why people hate J J Abrams. Sure his movies aren't "ZOMG ITS TEH BEST THIS EVAR" but thats just it: Amazing movies don't happen ALL THE TIME. At least he is consistent in providing movies that are fun to watch, even if they are forgettable at times.

Also, I honestly hope he has learned from all the internet rage that he does in fact use far too much lens flare and hope he will correct that in his upcoming movies.
It isn't that his movies aren't great/good.

It's that they lack soul/substance/passion/creative vision etc. EDIT:(I realized it didn't make sense)the fact that his movie lack that touch is why everyone is riled up.

NOT:
"J.J. ABRAMS IS SUCH A BAD DIRECTOR, HIS MOVIES SUCK! ZOMG!"

BUT:
"WHY IS HE DIRECTING IT AND NOT SOME ASPIRING FILM STUDENT/SOMEONE TO WHOM THE SUBJECT MATTER IS PART OF WHO THEY ARE?"
 

uchytjes

New member
Mar 19, 2011
969
0
0
Akichi Daikashima said:
It isn't that his movies aren't great/good.

It's that they lack soul/substance/passion/creative vision etc. that kind of mediocrity is why everyone is riled up.

NOT:
"J.J. ABRAMS IS SUCH A BAD DIRECTOR, HIS MOVIES SUCK! ZOMG!"

BUT:
"WHY IS HE DIRECTING IT AND NOT SOME ASPIRING FILM STUDENT/SOMEONE TO WHOM THE SUBJECT MATTER IS PART OF WHO THEY ARE?"
Oh, that is an EASY question to answer: money. Producers will hire people that are a safe bet rather than someone that is unpredictable.

Also, I'm completely against people directing things because of their nostalgia. If they are doing it out of pure nostalgia all they can produce is something that is, at best, a copy of the original. When you have someone that doesn't have nostalgic feelings towards the original material, it gives way to A: innovation and modernization of the original material and B: a brand new story instead of a re-hash of an old one.

Of course, as is possible in any situation, all hell can break loose and the project could just go to shit regardless of who is directing it.
 
Apr 5, 2012
100
0
0
Akichi Daikashima said:
uchytjes said:
I still don't understand why people hate J J Abrams. Sure his movies aren't "ZOMG ITS TEH BEST THIS EVAR" but thats just it: Amazing movies don't happen ALL THE TIME. At least he is consistent in providing movies that are fun to watch, even if they are forgettable at times.

Also, I honestly hope he has learned from all the internet rage that he does in fact use far too much lens flare and hope he will correct that in his upcoming movies.
It isn't that his movies aren't great/good.

It's that they lack soul/substance/passion/creative vision etc. EDIT:(I realized it didn't make sense)the fact that his movie lack that touch is why everyone is riled up.

NOT:
"J.J. ABRAMS IS SUCH A BAD DIRECTOR, HIS MOVIES SUCK! ZOMG!"

BUT:
"WHY IS HE DIRECTING IT AND NOT SOME ASPIRING FILM STUDENT/SOMEONE TO WHOM THE SUBJECT MATTER IS PART OF WHO THEY ARE?"
I don't want to get into a debate about if JJ's movies have "souls" or not. But most of the complaints I've seen really do boil down to, "ARGGGGGHHHHH JJ SUCKS AND LENZ FLARE!!!!!!!"
 

RyQ_TMC

New member
Apr 24, 2009
1,002
0
0
That means either a movie based on a puzzle game with subtle cues for player to piece the story together, or a very definitely non-silent Gordon Freeman.

You know they would write him to throw one-liners at a rate of five every minute.

You know they would.