Dark Souls III: what to keep, bring back, leave out or change?

Recommended Videos

Chaos Isaac

New member
Jun 27, 2013
609
0
0
1st: If making a Covenant of helping players, just keep it as the Sunbroes, and let them be rewarded for both repelling invaders, and helping kill a boss. (Or surviving a allotted summon time.)

2nd: Revert the armor system to Dark Souls 1 style. Having different weight roll speeds and stamina usage clear and different helped add to the feel of the game. Light mages who didn't wear much were different then med armor dex guys who could roll okay but liked to bleed dudes out.

3rd: Fuck the adaptability stat thing. Having to put points in a stat to make your roll worth a damn was just bad, same thing with interacting with objects.

4th: Again, be like Dark Souls 1 and have interesting NPCs. Dark Souls 2 was mostly devoid of interesting characters I could care about. There was no sad boss relative who I could care about (Qualana's sister). Hex Ornstein had nothing explaining him or anything about him in the game. There was no charmingly creepy and helpful Solaire. (And the girl from DKS 2 just fucking disappears for no reason. At least Iron Tarkus had a corpse.)

5th: More sensible Covenants and locations. Seriously, this no name joker being the leader of the Dragon Covenant when there is a fucking ancient dragon in the game? Are you kidding me? Not even that, he's protected by fucking Covenant member NPCs!? More-so then that, we had to grab a item to give to said unimportant joker who has no affiliation for them? C'mon.

6th: Don't fucking lie to us about DLC. Moreso, don't fucking hold the rest of the campaign in DLC without at least telling us. And don't hold the best damned levels and story telling environments in the DLC.

7th: I don't mind the super 4 big bad gimmick we have. It's fun, but don't make them stupid re-hashed essentialy remakes/mind controlled by the old big bads, it just diminishes things.

8th: No enemies on top of bonfires pls, and while we're here, if we don't have a safe bonfire going to a npc or merchant who does something no one else can, you've kind of fucked up.

9th: If you have to do call back gear, do the characters who are neat, or kind of matter that adds to the lore. The black knight stuff, onionbro and havel gear just stood out as odd and misplaced amongst everything.

10th: Guarantee drops from enemies who only have one life. If I find all the secret dudes and hit them hard enough to drop them, and don't get their super limited drops, that's just aggravating.

11th: Better punching weapons pls. Better punching backstab/riposte animations please.

12th: This is something from Bloodborne, but criticals on bosses that are badass. Being able to stop a monolith and throw it down with a crit takes some skill and is very rewarding.

13th: More NPC invaders with a story, like Kirk. Also, more npc invaders who play tricks on players, like guy in frozen place who follows you in a box. And, well, more NPC invaders who are kind of special, like say in a area, you'll get invaded by the bosses 'guardians', kind of like the belltower, but not as frickin' assinine.

14th: A covenant less PVP gladiatorial arena, that changes a bit. (Like water flows in to slow movement, or poison fog fills in to damage both players, or another fog that negates all healing items.) This would be amazing, and let players just duke it out without needing items, and make it a special location of it's own. Even if there are PVP covenants, keep these here anyways as places where they can gather and have sweet combat at will.

15th: No forced invasion/summon area's. They're just pointless if you play offline, and more then likely annoying if you're playing online. And if you have to do them, which actually is fine, don't make them story forced where you have to go through them. Let players know what they are stepping into, and let them have a actual reward instead of just.. beating no body rat mans.

16th: Improved magic system. Power spells and built in aiming were good idea's, and did not need to be scrapped. More so, don't nerf this shit into the dirt, and get rid of the dual stat/uses lower deal that hexes had. More so, have a few special items/spells that let mages/swordsages to do close up combat properly. Actually, this is one place where you could have dual stats/use lower to make sure they're not a bit much.

17th: No soul memory. Maybe some kind of scaling system for the invaded/summoning player.

18th: It's own story and lore. Of course, it's in the Dark Souls continuity, but let's have it be able to stand on it's own merits unlike Dark Souls 2. So, let things add onto the lore, like more natural progressions of the covenants, kingdoms and aspects like Chaos and the Abyss.

There's more but kinda tired and yeah.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
Chaos Isaac said:
8th: No enemies on top of bonfires pls, and while we're here, if we don't have a safe bonfire going to a npc or merchant who does something no one else can, you've kind of fucked up.
At the very least they shouldn't be putting an important NPC in a room full of AOE enemies with a bonfire that spawns you right there (Straid).

Chaos Isaac said:
10th: Guarantee drops from enemies who only have one life. If I find all the secret dudes and hit them hard enough to drop them, and don't get their super limited drops, that's just aggravating.
Oh hell yes, they put an entire armour set and weapon as a rare drop on a hidden phantom that only appears once in NG+ and above AND is linked to bonfire that has a boss attached so you have to kill it every time you use an ascetic if you try to farm it (I collected most of the armour and weapons in the game but there is no way I'm bothering with that shit).
 

not_you

Don't ask, or you won't know
Mar 16, 2011
479
0
0
Add in opt-in multiplayer again!

PLEASE don't make invasions always-on... That was (admittedly) the number 1 reason why I never bought DS2...
 

mrdude2010

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,315
0
0
I liked Estus better in DS1. I liked weapon degradation better in DS1. It was a lot easier to spend souls than it was to have them degrade at the drop of a hat, and finding a style you're comfortable with is key in the From Software game. I hated enemies disappearing if you killed them enough times. If you were in a spot with both a tough boss and a tough approach (Tomb of the Giants without the Light spell in DS1 comes to mind), you would waste a huge amount of souls, and grinding was an integral part of getting strong enough to face the next challenge for new players. Other than that, I don't have any particularly strong opinions.
 

baddude1337

Taffer
Jun 9, 2010
1,855
0
0
Bring back the Elite Knight Armour! It's by far my favourite piece of armour in any of the games. Seeing as it was in 2 also I'm hopeful it's in 3.
 

joest01

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2009
399
0
21
keep: dual wielding, faster combat, upgrade system

lose: cutscenes and attempts at "storytelling" especially opening cutscene. I was ready to turn my disc in when I started up DkS2 for the first time

undecided: bonfire ascetics. I liked the ability to farm certain bosses but I think I'd prefer reintroducing player and world tendency.
 

KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime

Lolita Style, The Best Style!
Jan 12, 2010
2,151
0
0
I only have one complaint really that applies to DkS2, the ripostes are just awful in every way shape and form. A riposte should feel like I broke through someones defenses and got a really nasty hit on them for taking advantage of the opening. They should not feel like I'm squashing a bug. The fall down to preform riposte made it impossible to chain ripostes, while at the same time made ripostes feel really unsatisfying. Please give me back the DkS1 riposte.

Well I have another complaint, riposte and back stab invincibility frames need to last longer than they did in DkS2, like they did in DkS1, so I can actually respond to an enemy that closed the distance just as the animation finished. I detest getting blind sided because I managed a critical.

Edit: Also the Heide's Knights were a really pitiful replacement for the Black Knights, if I'm meeting a rare enemy that's going to give me a big reward... That enemy had better be pretty formidable.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
I figured I should post one of these for anyone who hasn't seen anything from the network test and is curious.

Guy who's playing got disconnected at one point and has a terrible sense of direction so it repeats a bit. The boss fight is at 1:18:00 and he dose some PVP after that.

Oh and you can switch between the targeting system in DS1 and the targeting system in DS2 in the options.

 

Wasted

New member
Dec 19, 2013
250
0
0
Have it like Bloodborne where you can choose to play online or offline from the main menu; or like in DSI were we need to use an item ingame to engage in the COOP/PVP mechanics. We should ultimately decide when we want to engage these features, but when we are not playing online...

ALLOW US TO FREAKING PAUSE THE GAME!

This is easily one of the dumbest and most backwards design choices I have seen in a game. For such a highly rated series, the fact that it gets away not implementing a pause feature is baffling.
 

StreamerDarkly

Disciple of Trevor Philips
Jan 15, 2015
193
0
0
Evonisia said:
Oh I have a cosmetic one: keep the nightmare fog walls from Bloodborne.

I despise the cheap looking texture they use for fog in Dark Souls 1 and 2, where it looks less like fog and more like grey cardboard leaking paint. I know it seems like a nitpick (because it is), but given how many boss fights there are in these games you do encounter it a bunch. Especially in Dark Souls II's training area.

On a related note, make it so you always know you're going in to a boss fight. Just entering a room and having a boss fight happen always felt like a cheap shot to me, made all the more frustrating by the fact that later attempts will always have that safe wall of fog asking you if you're sure you want to get stamped on this time.
Pretty sure it was only Bloodborne that doesn't have the fog gate the first time you fight a boss. If you fail the first attempt then the fog gate will be there for every subsequent attempt. Not only that, but after the first attempt the boss reacts to your presence faster when entering the room, which changes the opening of the fight. This is a small point but it's one I really didn't like in certain fights (e.g. Shadows, Ebrietas, Gehrman). On the other hand, when the fog gate is there it at least prevents other enemies from sneaking into the boss fight to mess you up. This can happen with One Reborn, for example.

Of course, DS2 is guilty of putting fog gates in some of the area transitions where there isn't actually a boss. This always seemed strange to me.

I vote for the consistent approach - the fog gate should always be there, but only for boss rooms. Also give the player i-frames while traversing the fog gate instead of allowing them to be interrupted like in DS2.
 

BytByte

New member
Nov 26, 2009
425
0
0
Wasted said:
Have it like Bloodborne where you can choose to play online or offline from the main menu; or like in DSI us to use an item ingame to engage in the COOP/PVP mechanics. We should ultimately decide when we want to engage these features, but when we are not playing online...

ALLOW US TO FREAKING PAUSE THE GAME!

This is easily one of the dumbest and most backwards design choices I have seen in a game. For such a highly rated series, the fact that it gets away not implementing a pause feature is baffling.
Pausing the game invariably makes the world comlpetely harmless anytime you want. If you mean just a flat out pause where monsters and you can't do anything (like nothing, no armor changes or using items), that'd be cool, but if the whole start menu is at your disposal, that would go against the Soul's design philosophy.
 

StreamerDarkly

Disciple of Trevor Philips
Jan 15, 2015
193
0
0
CandideWolf said:
Pausing the game invariably makes the world comlpetely harmless anytime you want. If you mean just a flat out pause where monsters and you can't do anything (like nothing, no armor changes or using items), that'd be cool, but if the whole start menu is at your disposal, that would go against the Soul's design philosophy.
Clearly not what he was asking for. No one would expect to be able to operate the menu to gain an advantage while the game is paused.

As for "going against the Souls design philoshophy", I see this trotted out time and time again where it doesn't belong. I mean, the Souls games have always let you quit out of the game to gain various advantages (resetting enemy positions, spawning in favorable places just prior to fall death, etc.). Being able to pause isn't even close to the egregious violation of "Souls philosophy" that quit-outs are.
 

bartholen_v1legacy

A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
Jan 24, 2009
3,056
0
0
StreamerDarkly said:
CandideWolf said:
Pausing the game invariably makes the world comlpetely harmless anytime you want. If you mean just a flat out pause where monsters and you can't do anything (like nothing, no armor changes or using items), that'd be cool, but if the whole start menu is at your disposal, that would go against the Soul's design philosophy.
Clearly not what he was asking for. No one would expect to be able to operate the menu to gain an advantage while the game is paused.

As for "going against the Souls design philoshophy", I see this trotted out time and time again where it doesn't belong. I mean, the Souls games have always let you quit out of the game to gain various advantages (resetting enemy positions, spawning in favorable places just prior to fall death, etc.). Being able to pause isn't even close to the egregious violation of "Souls philosophy" that quit-outs are.
I'd be in favor of a separate pause menu button, one that lets you change the settings and quit the game, and that's it. Keep the equipment and item menus in real time, and we're good.

Also, fix the fucking amount of Souls given by enemies in different areas. DS2 has this completely ass backwards: the order of the Greatsouls is quite clearly supposed to be 1. Lost Sinner 2. Old Iron King 3. Duke's Dear Freja and 4. Rotten. But the area where you get the most souls in the entire game aside from Dragon Shrine is Iron Keep, and that's not even halfway through the game. In DS1 it was well balanced, because each of the Lord soul areas housed different enemies and you were given total freedom to do them in any order. In DS2 the enemies in what are supposed to be the final areas of the game (again, aside from Dragon Shrine) drop a pathetic pittance of souls in comparison to Iron Keep. Brightstone Cove is such a joke in this regard it's basically not even worth the hassle on new game+ and you can just use bonfire ascetic and kill the Rotten twice.
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,256
0
0
StreamerDarkly said:
Evonisia said:
Pretty sure it was only Bloodborne that doesn't have the fog gate the first time you fight a boss. If you fail the first attempt then the fog gate will be there for every subsequent attempt. Not only that, but after the first attempt the boss reacts to your presence faster when entering the room, which changes the opening of the fight. This is a small point but it's one I really didn't like in certain fights (e.g. Shadows, Ebrietas, Gehrman). On the other hand, when the fog gate is there it at least prevents other enemies from sneaking into the boss fight to mess you up. This can happen with One Reborn, for example.

Of course, DS2 is guilty of putting fog gates in some of the area transitions where there isn't actually a boss. This always seemed strange to me.

I vote for the consistent approach - the fog gate should always be there, but only for boss rooms. Also give the player i-frames while traversing the fog gate instead of allowing them to be interrupted like in DS2.
Oops. I just realised how badly I worded my post. Thanks for pointing that out. But yes, essentially make the visual of the fog wall like Bloodborne's with the system of Dark Souls 1, then. Dark Souls II had quite a few unnecessary ones, and Bloodborne pulled that horrible "first boss fight is a surprise" trick on near enough every single boss.
 

PrimitiveJudge

New member
Aug 14, 2012
368
0
0
10th: Guarantee drops from enemies who only have one life. If I find all the secret dudes and hit them hard enough to drop them, and don't get their super limited drops, that's just aggravating. Chaos Isaac said this. (I do not remember the quoting for this site)

I disagree with this 100%. The first time I beat Dark Souls 1 was because of max upgrade of black knight armor, max upgrade of great shield of Artorias and Black knight Halberd. That weapon is hard as shit to acquire no matter how many humanity you have. Even if this "Special" is a one of a time only, then it should always be rare as hell to loot him/her.

OT: I loved the interlocking areas of DS1 and enjoyed the boss fights, But DS2 had some moments. First of all there was no interlocking zones and too many bonfires. (whoever created this should be fired and shot) well at least be put on the wii for how safe it was. There is only 3 boss fights in DS2 that there were actually hard as hell to solo: Looking Glass Knight, The Lost Sinner and the Smelter Demon (seriously fuck him).

My hopes for DS3 are: Interlocking zones with minimal bonfires and hards as shit bosses like DS1, but Hard as shit zones like in DS2. Meaning I want to hear the cries of 100million people and smile.
 

SantoUno

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,583
0
0
Give us some PERMANENT Red Eye and Blue Eye Orbs so that the invasions and vigilante players are actually able to engage with each other. However in order for that to work, the covenants in which you are summoned when the corresponding event occurs (Blue Disciple, Bell Covenant, etc.) shouldn't require you to waste a ring slot on the off chance that you MIGHT be summoned. Instead, perhaps have a separate ring slot for covenants so players can choose to wear or not wear the convenant ring and still have their normal ring slots.
 

joest01

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2009
399
0
21
PrimitiveJudge said:
10th: Guarantee drops from enemies who only have one life. If I find all the secret dudes and hit them hard enough to drop them, and don't get their super limited drops, that's just aggravating. Chaos Isaac said this. (I do not remember the quoting for this site)

I disagree with this 100%. The first time I beat Dark Souls 1 was because of max upgrade of black knight armor, max upgrade of great shield of Artorias and Black knight Halberd. That weapon is hard as shit to acquire no matter how many humanity you have. Even if this "Special" is a one of a time only, then it should always be rare as hell to loot him/her.

OT: I loved the interlocking areas of DS1 and enjoyed the boss fights, But DS2 had some moments. First of all there was no interlocking zones and too many bonfires. (whoever created this should be fired and shot) well at least be put on the wii for how safe it was. There is only 3 boss fights in DS2 that there were actually hard as hell to solo: Looking Glass Knight, The Lost Sinner and the Smelter Demon (seriously fuck him).

My hopes for DS3 are: Interlocking zones with minimal bonfires and hards as shit bosses like DS1, but Hard as shit zones like in DS2. Meaning I want to hear the cries of 100million people and smile.
Bosses in DkS2 too easy to solo? I share your appreciation of looking glass knight. You found ancient dragon easy to solo. Or pursuer. Heck TWO pursuers. The thronw duo? Nothing in DkS1 was anywhere near as challenging as those battles.
 

bartholen_v1legacy

A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
Jan 24, 2009
3,056
0
0
joest01 said:
Bosses in DkS2 too easy to solo? I share your appreciation of looking glass knight. You found ancient dragon easy to solo. Or pursuer. Heck TWO pursuers. The thronw duo? Nothing in DkS1 was anywhere near as challenging as those battles.
Ancient dragon is optional, and made hard via his massive health bar and instakill fire breath. The double pursuers are optional and only in New Game+. The Throne duo IS easy, Throne Watcher goes down like wet toilet paper, and then it's just a matter of killing Defender fast enough. The Pursuer is hard when you first meet him, but once you figure out that rolling towards his shield and strafing to the right are the key, he becomes laughably easy. Nope, Four Kings, Gwyn, Quelaag and O&S still have the edge over any of those battles.
 

joest01

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2009
399
0
21
bartholen said:
joest01 said:
Bosses in DkS2 too easy to solo? I share your appreciation of looking glass knight. You found ancient dragon easy to solo. Or pursuer. Heck TWO pursuers. The thronw duo? Nothing in DkS1 was anywhere near as challenging as those battles.
Ancient dragon is optional, and made hard via his massive health bar and instakill fire breath. The double pursuers are optional and only in New Game+. The Throne duo IS easy, Throne Watcher goes down like wet toilet paper, and then it's just a matter of killing Defender fast enough. The Pursuer is hard when you first meet him, but once you figure out that rolling towards his shield and strafing to the right are the key, he becomes laughably easy. Nope, Four Kings, Gwyn, Quelaag and O&S still have the edge over any of those battles.
interesting. 4Kings is barely a skill based battle. Gwyn can be parried pretty reliably. I never had trouble with Queelag. I do appreciate her design though :) And from a purely gameplay perspective the throne duo is pretty much an improved O&S fight.
p.s. what isn't optional in these games :)

I just thought of one more thing to bring back. The old whip!
 

bartholen_v1legacy

A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
Jan 24, 2009
3,056
0
0
joest01 said:
And from a purely gameplay perspective the throne duo is pretty much an improved O&S fight.
Can you explain this to me? I'm not trying to get into an argument, but I've seen other people say this as well, and I can't for the life of me see why. Their designs are bland (hey, another pair of dudes in armor), the arena is bland, they move slowly, attack slowly, can be blocked as opposed to Smough's charge or butt stomp and the music certainly isn't as memorable as in O&S. I can't see anything in the fight that O&S didn't already do better. They do make for a fun and challenging boss fight double bill if you don't go to them after getting the King's Ring though, since you're forced to fight Nashandra immediately after.