Dark Souls Lore

Recommended Videos

endtherapture

New member
Nov 14, 2011
3,127
0
0
Can someone explain to me some of the Dark Souls lore.

I understand the basic stuff like the war between the Dragons and the Lords, the Age of fire, why the Bed of Chaos was created etc. and that the bonfires are dying which is connected with the humans going hollow but I have several questions.

When did the undead apocalypse start? Was it a few years ago or was it like a thousand years in the past? Does the undead apocalypse only affect Lordran or does it affect the other cultures eg. Balder, Vinheim etc.?

Did the human nations rise after the age of Fire or were they present in the age of Dark? Do they all swear fealty to Anor Londo/Lordran and pay tribute or was Anor Londo/Lordran just a separate political entity?

Gwyn and his Silver./Black knights went hollow didn't they? So were they human or are they not human and some other humanoid entity instead? Were the Witches of Izalith human or were they also more than human but still humanoid?

Who were the "good" side in the war against the Everlasting Dragons? Cos the Lords did help the rise of humanity but Seath and Nito seemed like pretty evil things to me so I'm not sure if the Dragons are the good side or not...

Let's hope we can have some cool discussion/debate on these points!
 

Rutabaga_swe

New member
Aug 17, 2013
125
0
0
Look up EpicNameBro and Vaatividya on youtube, they both have extensive videos on the lore of dark souls :)
 

JazzJack2

New member
Feb 10, 2013
268
0
0
endtherapture said:
Gwyn and his Silver./Black knights went hollow didn't they? So were they human or are they not human and some other humanoid entity instead?
They're definitly not humans because it's pretty heavily implied that the Furtive Pygmy created humans after they killed the dragons.
 

Rutabaga_swe

New member
Aug 17, 2013
125
0
0
Well as for the first question, the age of fire is still going in Dark Souls, so far as i understand it. The choice you make at the end is to either link the fire to keep the age of fire going, or let it end by becoming the dark lord and ushering in the age of darkness.

As for what is human or not, i think it's safe to assume that none of the lords were/are human.

The whole good or evil thing is kinda moot, i don't think you can say either side is good or evil. I don't think it was ever implied that the dragons were particularly evil, nor does it say that they were good. They just were, much like the lords. You say that Nito doesn't seem particularly good, but then again you are an undead yourself. Not usually a state considered good in fiction yet it's not implied that undead = evil. Nito is just the lord of death. As for Seathe, i think it'd be more fitting to call him a coward and a betrayer rather than evil. He's just looking out for #1 as he has no scales of immortality and, i'm guessing, wanted the primordial crystal to rectify that.
 

Tom_green_day

New member
Jan 5, 2013
1,383
0
0
I liked the thing about Anor Londo, and why it's like it is. I couldn't spoil it on here because I've completely forgotten what it was. I just remember it was cool.
 

Bob Thenecromancer

New member
Nov 10, 2012
82
0
0
Its implied that the lords created the undead cures to force the humans to burn more humanity which in turn prolongs the first flame.

This video explains it a little better. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaIJpVwKgZw
 

Alma Mare

New member
Nov 14, 2010
263
0
0
endtherapture said:
Can someone explain to me some of the Dark Souls lore.

I understand the basic stuff like the war between the Dragons and the Lords, the Age of fire, why the Bed of Chaos was created etc. and that the bonfires are dying which is connected with the humans going hollow but I have several questions.

When did the undead apocalypse start? Was it a few years ago or was it like a thousand years in the past? Does the undead apocalypse only affect Lordran or does it affect the other cultures eg. Balder, Vinheim etc.?

Did the human nations rise after the age of Fire or were they present in the age of Dark? Do they all swear fealty to Anor Londo/Lordran and pay tribute or was Anor Londo/Lordran just a separate political entity?

Gwyn and his Silver./Black knights went hollow didn't they? So were they human or are they not human and some other humanoid entity instead? Were the Witches of Izalith human or were they also more than human but still humanoid?

Who were the "good" side in the war against the Everlasting Dragons? Cos the Lords did help the rise of humanity but Seath and Nito seemed like pretty evil things to me so I'm not sure if the Dragons are the good side or not...

Let's hope we can have some cool discussion/debate on these points!
By the order you asked;

The curse of the undead started when Gwin sacrificed himself to the flame, becoming Lord of Cinder, roughly a thousand years before the events of the game. It affected every human realm, seen by the undeads of Carim, Balder, Astora and Vilheim etc... that came to Lordran to seek an end to the affliction.

Humans descended from the Furtive Pigmy, so it's implied they rose well after the Giants were stablished and worshipped the Giants as Gods.

I don't know wether they are "hollow" in the same sense a victim of the darksign becomes, but they are definitely a husk of their former selves. They most definitely are not human. It's not known how many anthropomorphic races were there before the First Flame, but humanity definitely came after that. Even clearly humanoid characters such as Ciaran and Quelanna refer to the player as a "mere human", for reference.

Don't ever try to think of good vs bad in Dark Souls. It doesn't roll that way. The Dragons are understood as beeing static beings, before the advent of disparity that the Flame brought. They aren't even truly alive in the same sense the Giants were. Their age had ended, so they had to give way. As for how the character stands, bear with me...

The humans worshipped the Lords (Giants empowered by the Lord Souls mentioned in the intro) as Gods. The Gods figured out that the Flame could be fed by Humanity (aka fragments of the Dark Soul aka the Lord Sould the Pigmy hoarded to himself before being promptly forgotten). So after their attempts to prevent the end of the flame failed (Witch Queen failure and Gwin's sacrifice merely being a bid for time) the Gods started shepperding the humans into the bonfire. It's not stated where the DarkSign came from, but it's pretty likely Nito. It prevents humans into dying (and death is his Domain) and instead tricks them into feeding humanity to the bonfires (and thus the First Flame, since they are meant to be linked like a network). The ability to do so (rite of Kindling) is known to have come from Nito, and the Paladins of the Way of White both search for that rite and protect Nito (like Paladin Leeroy). So Nito is not so much an evil-deathlord-personified but a Lord like the others who tries to protect the Age of Fire with the powers within his domain.
Seath can be seen as not straight-up evil and cruel and naughty, but was driven by jealously of the imortality of his dragon brethen. Later he became mad, so his motivations are a moot point by the time we meet him.
 

not_you

Don't ask, or you won't know
Mar 16, 2011
479
0
0
Rutabaga_swe said:
Look up EpicNameBro and Vaatividya on youtube, they both have extensive videos on the lore of dark souls :)
I personally prefer Vaatividya's...

He did a "Dark souls lore in a minute" that wraps things up rather quickly... But seriously, it surprised the hell out of me how deep the story in that game actually goes...
And the complete ambiguity of good vs evil (Ie; who is good and who is evil) leaves everything up to interpretation...

The whole primordial serpent Frampt using you as a pawn to keep the age of fire going, or Kaathe telling you what's REALLY going on in a way that makes the age of dark seem like the best way to go... You're taking everyone's word for it, there is no solid proof of the right answer until you're stuck with the decision... And even then, the good or bad ending is STILL up for interpretation....

Now all this talking about it makes me want DS2 already....
HURRY UP 2014!
 

Alma Mare

New member
Nov 14, 2010
263
0
0
By the way, it helps to know wether you played the DLC. It adds a lot of missing pieces of the puzzle. Not, it doesn't make it any easier to solve it, quite the contrary. But still, it's nice to have more pieces.
 

Alma Mare

New member
Nov 14, 2010
263
0
0
Judging by their size, the knights are human. The Witch of Izalith was likely human, and so were her daughters
.

Neither the knights or the Daughters were human.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,308
0
0
endtherapture said:
When did the undead apocalypse start? Was it a few years ago or was it like a thousand years in the past? Does the undead apocalypse only affect Lordran or does it affect the other cultures eg. Balder, Vinheim etc.?
It's happening everywhere, and it started when Gwyn artificially prolonged the age of fire. Numbers are fuzzy due to the distorted flow of time in Lordran.
People mention how they became undead, and went to Lordran.

Did the human nations rise after the age of Fire or were they present in the age of Dark? Do they all swear fealty to Anor Londo/Lordran and pay tribute or was Anor Londo/Lordran just a separate political entity?
It's unclear when human nations rose, but Thorouland follows Allfather Lloyd who is Gwyn's uncle.

Gwyn and his Silver./Black knights went hollow didn't they? So were they human or are they not human and some other humanoid entity instead? Were the Witches of Izalith human or were they also more than human but still humanoid?
The gods and witches aren't human, and going crazy isn't the same thing as going hollow.

Who were the "good" side in the war against the Everlasting Dragons? Cos the Lords did help the rise of humanity but Seath and Nito seemed like pretty evil things to me so I'm not sure if the Dragons are the good side or not...
That's kind of fuzzy.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
When did the undead apocalypse start? Was it a few years ago or was it like a thousand years in the past? Does the undead apocalypse only affect Lordran or does it affect the other cultures eg. Balder, Vinheim etc.?
I don't know when it started. It dose effect other areas. The hollowed Blader knights (who came with King whats his face in sen's fortress to try an end the undead curse only to end up hollowed perhaps?) are one of the standard enemies in the game. There is also Rhea of Thorolund and Siegmeyer of Catarina who came to Lordran after becoming undead. I remember something about entire nations having fallen due to the undead curse.

Did the human nations rise after the age of Fire or were they present in the age of Dark? Do they all swear fealty to Anor Londo/Lordran and pay tribute or was Anor Londo/Lordran just a separate political entity?
I'm not clear on exactly what humans and "humanity" actually is in this game. Some clearly revere the Lords. I don't know how far this goes though I'm guessing worshiping them is common from the priests and faith skills.

I think Kaathe is full of shit or at least not telling the whole truth when he refers to the age of dark as the "Age of Man". Maybe humans would be dominant in an age of dark but not as they are now, more like the twisted monsters you encounter in the DLC? Keep the fire burning or let it fade, either way you're being manipulated by groups that don't really care about humans.

Gwyn and his Silver./Black knights went hollow didn't they? So were they human or are they not human and some other humanoid entity instead? Were the Witches of Izalith human or were they also more than human but still humanoid?
They aren't human. The Knights, Artorias and Ornstein are Gwyns race I think. Then there is the giants which I think are different again. The witches aren't human. There is one you can talk too and she refers to you as "human" so she isn't. I don't know what Ciaran is since she is human sized so I would assume not the knights race but she is clearly not human from how she talks. The knights went crazy from being consumed by the fire like Gwyn I think.

Who were the "good" side in the war against the Everlasting Dragons? Cos the Lords did help the rise of humanity but Seath and Nito seemed like pretty evil things to me so I'm not sure if the Dragons are the good side or not...
I don't know that the dragons are good or evil or just "are".

Edit: fixing some of my horrible typos.
 

Alma Mare

New member
Nov 14, 2010
263
0
0
Twenty Ninjas said:
Alma Mare said:
Judging by their size, the knights are human. The Witch of Izalith was likely human, and so were her daughters
.

Neither the knights or the Daughters were human.
Your source for this? They are human-sized and one of the Sisters is hollow, a hint that she is undead, thus was once human.
(Well, that's either a sister or someone who stole her clothes, her catalyst, and somehow learned chaos pyromancy).

Also use the quote function or I won't know you said anything.
The only human-sized knight is Ciaran. Artorias, Ornstein, Smough (not a knight, but a possible candidate) would be freakishly huge human at best. Then, Ghough. Size means little in this game. The characters adressing you as "mere human", however... (Ciaran does this, Gough does this, Artorias would have done this had his dialogue made it into the game and Ornstein and Smough don't ever talk to you, but they were respectively a high-ranking official and a dragonslayer.

As for the Witch of Izalith, being human would make her progeny of the Pigmy and have shards of humanity within her. That's pretty much impossible.
 

Alma Mare

New member
Nov 14, 2010
263
0
0
Twenty Ninjas said:
Alma Mare said:
The only human-sized knight is Ciaran. Artorias, Ornstein, Smough (not a knight, but a possible candidate) would be freakishly huge human at best. Then, Ghough. Size means little in this game. The characters adressing you as "mere human", however... (Ciaran does this, Gough does this, Artorias would have done this had his dialogue made it into the game and Ornstein and Smough don't ever talk to you, but they were respectively a high-ranking official and a dragonslayer.

As for the Witch of Izalith, being human would make her progeny of the Pigmy and have shards of humanity within her. That's pretty much impossible.
Oh, I thought you meant the black knights. Yes the Four Knights are mostly giants, though I don't know what Ciaran's supposed to be.

Not sure how you can go hollow without being human (i.e. losing your humanity). Remember that the whole pygmy ordeal is never clarified at all. I really doubt every human is the pygmy's descendant.
Why do you think the Daugther of Chaos that attacks you at the Bed of Chaos' door is hollow? As for the Pigmy think, I agree it's fuzzy as fuck, but the Pigmy --> Dark Soul --> Humanity in humans link seems pretty solid. The hows and whens and whys, though...
 

endtherapture

New member
Nov 14, 2011
3,127
0
0
Cool answers and debate, thanks :)

What is he furtive pigmy exactly? I know it's in the intro cinematic but is it in game at any point?
 

Dandark

New member
Sep 2, 2011
1,703
0
0
endtherapture said:
Can someone explain to me some of the Dark Souls lore.

I understand the basic stuff like the war between the Dragons and the Lords, the Age of fire, why the Bed of Chaos was created etc. and that the bonfires are dying which is connected with the humans going hollow but I have several questions.

1. When did the undead apocalypse start? Was it a few years ago or was it like a thousand years in the past? Does the undead apocalypse only affect Lordran or does it affect the other cultures eg. Balder, Vinheim etc.?

2. Did the human nations rise after the age of Fire or were they present in the age of Dark? Do they all swear fealty to Anor Londo/Lordran and pay tribute or was Anor Londo/Lordran just a separate political entity?

3. Gwyn and his Silver./Black knights went hollow didn't they? So were they human or are they not human and some other humanoid entity instead? Were the Witches of Izalith human or were they also more than human but still humanoid?

4. Who were the "good" side in the war against the Everlasting Dragons? Cos the Lords did help the rise of humanity but Seath and Nito seemed like pretty evil things to me so I'm not sure if the Dragons are the good side or not...

Let's hope we can have some cool discussion/debate on these points!
In order as I understand it anyway...

1. It started when Gwyn fed himself to the flame and linked the fire which was at least 1000 years before the game but the flow of time is distorted so time doesn't actually mean that much(For example you summoning Tarkus after he died. The undead apocalypse affects the entire world and has even ruined several nations. Most of the knights(The non black or silver ones) are actually knights from other nations that came seeking a cure to the undead curse only to fall and go hollow).


2. Humans as a species were only even created after the age of fire, the theory is that they were created by the furtive pygmy splitting up his lord soul(The dark soul) into fragments which became the humanity inside of humans. I don't know too much about it but I think that a lot of human nations worshipped the lords as Gods with Anor Londo as their capital, however I don't think they all served under Gywn as his personal army or anything, kinda like medieval Europe worshipping Christianity and the Vatican but not actually being directly under the popes command.


3. Neither Gywn, nor his knights, nor the Witches of Izalith were human. Despite their varying sizes I am pretty sure that all the lords were actually giants but some were bigger than others. Gwyn simply burnt up, his body is all that is left and is an empty shell of him. His black knights were all burned alive when he linked the fire and their bodies are pretty much just the armour being inhabited by disembodied spirits. The reason Ciaran is human sized IMO is because she worked as an assassin for Gwyn who assassinated his enemies, I imagine that any enemies Gwyn had were mostly dissenting humans so she likely infiltrated human groups to seek out traitors. Seeing as someone the size of the other knights would easily stick out she probably somehow made herself smaller to fit in. She also fought with daggers so I would assume her fighting style favoured dodging blows and striking the enemy quickly or even avoiding combat completely so being smaller would not hinder in combat as much it would say Artorias or Ornstein, in many cases it may even be a benefit. Im not sure about the witches but the original witch of Izalith who took the lord soul is definatly a giant and not human, although seemingly human sized I am pretty sure that her daughters are also giants, just smaller ones.


4. There isn't really good and evil in Dark souls. The dragons were static and their age was an age of no disparity with nothing changing. Their was no colour, no life and death, no light and dark, everything just was. There were however two worlds here, there was the overworld where all the dragons lived while the giants lived underground in the "underworld"(Not meaning hell or anything, just that it was underground). They discovered the first fire which brought disparity and difference, there was no death and you could say that the everlasting dragons were like a dead race while the giants were now actually alive after discovering the first flame. They decided to take the overworld for themselves and went to war with the everlasting dragons, thanks to Seath betraying their weaknesses they were able to be victorious and took the overworld for themselves.
They then began the age of fire. There wasn't really a good side and a bad side, the dragons age ended and the giants/Lords began. As far as I know there isn't enough information to determine whether the giants were cruelly oppressed by the dragons or anything like that; though the fact they lived underground but then wanted to take the overworld implies that they may have been forced to live down there due to the dragons but im not sure.
They did commit genocide and nearly wipe out every last one of the everlasting dragons so you could say they went overboard and were evil but that's still stretching it a bit as the dragons may have done the same if they won.


endtherapture said:
Cool answers and debate, thanks :)

What is he furtive pigmy exactly? I know it's in the intro cinematic but is it in game at any point?
The furtive pigmy is a giant, I think he was a deformed giant who may have been shunned but at the very least didn't seem to like contact with the others. He found the 4th lord soul within the flames, the one he found was the Dark soul. While the other 3 lords worked together to take down the dragons and then create the age of fire, the pygmy didn't involve himself at all with anyone else and was completely forgotten. However the theory is that he fragmented and split up his dark soul to create humanity, the black sprites that are humanity in game are thought to be pieces of the dark soul.

As far as I can tell the dark soul seems to be able to continue multiplying it's fragments infinitely. Now it's not like every human as the power of a lord or anything but as seen during the game both lore wise and gameplay wise humanity is a highly valued resource. The lords did discover however that humanity can feed the bonfires/First flame to keep it burning so it's suspected by some that the lords were behind the undead curse to keep humans tied to the bonfires so that they kept feeding the flame. It's an interesting area to explore to be sure as what if humans were able to keep the flame burning with a renewable source?


Also I nearly forgot to mention but a lot of people believe that Manus(The boss at the end of the DLC, the primordial human) is actually the furtive pygmy. Im not sure how this one actually works and im hoping someone in this thread can enlighten me. As far as I can tell perhaps splitting up his souls so much caused to go mad and devolve into what he is when you encounter him.
 

Alma Mare

New member
Nov 14, 2010
263
0
0
endtherapture said:
Cool answers and debate, thanks :)

What is he furtive pigmy exactly? I know it's in the intro cinematic but is it in game at any point?
The only place where he's mentioned is in the intro, telling he is very easily forgotten. And the game promptly forgets about him. However, we do know thanks to Kaathe that he has a Lord Soul and that he has spread it among his descendents, creating humans with Humanity as we know them. Did he created from scratch? Or did he just give the fragments to his descendants? It's not known. What we do know, however, is that the Dark Soul Shards ("Humanity" ingame) not only are not necessarily linked to whatever makes us human but can actually gnaw at humans, twisting and corrupting them. The bonfire keepers are gnawed by it, barely able to contain it. When it goes wild, it twists the inhabitants of Oolacile into what you've seen there. And though it isn't stated as such, Manus is a primordial man filled with "humanity" to the brim. When it goes wild, so does he. So yeah, Pigmy, most likely. Forgotten, dead, resurrected by the Oolacile citizens after prompted by Kaathe. gone berserk and corrupted by his own Lord Soul.

Because the kicker here (and the reason why no ending is necessarly good, evil or even desirable) is that neither Serpents are honest with you. They don't care about the Giants, the Humans, or the Flame. They want Lord Souls. Frampt tells you he's working for Gwin, but all he does is trick you into filling the Lordvessel. If you fill it for Kaathe, murder Gwin and let the Flame die, he shows up at the end feeling totally cool with it. He got his Souls.
Kaathe works for the Dark Soul. He tells the player the Pigmy held onto it to usher in the age of mankind when the Flame died (which, as far as we know, is the truth, mankind was his race, after all) but he "forgets" to tell you that the dark that wild humanity brings (the Abyss) is no place for humans. He also doesn't mention that the Pigmy has gone completely berserk and is spreading the Abyss upon the land, twisting the citizens and swallowing whole cities. But he knows that, considering that is hobbies are 1 - collecting humanities (Dark Soul fragments) and 2 - tricking humans into spreading the abyss, dooming them and, eventually, drawing Manus/Pigmy) into the opening.
What is their purpose? Any chance of you not getting screwed either way? Your guess is as good as any.
 

endtherapture

New member
Nov 14, 2011
3,127
0
0
So there's basically 3 types of giants who are all giants but different sizes?
1. Small, man sized "giants" like the Witches of Izalith and Havel?
2. Medium giants but bigger than humans like Artorias, Ornstein and Gwyn?
3. Big giants like Smogh and the giant Blacksmith?
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,176
0
0
endtherapture said:
Cool answers and debate, thanks :)

What is he furtive pigmy exactly? I know it's in the intro cinematic but is it in game at any point?
The furtive pygmy is only mentioned directly in the intro, and never again. Darkstalker Kathe implies that your progenitor is the pygmy, as he says it found the Dark Soul.

It is believed that Manus might in fact be THE pygmy, the one mentioned in the intro. He is a "primeval man."

Something interesting about humanity is that Kathe may be telling the truth about the age of man and the age of dark. But in Oolacile we get to see just what the age of man will look like. It isn't too pretty.

Something to note though, is the description of the Soul of Manus. As we know, much of the lore is found in item descriptions.

Soul of Manus, Father of the Abyss.
This extraordinary soul is a viscous,
lukewarm lump of gentle humanity.

Ancient Manus was clearly once human.
But he became the Father of the Abyss
after his humanity went wild, eternally
seeking his precious broken pendant.
In Dark Souls 2, the description of the Human Effigy, the item that turns you to human form.

An effigy formed from a lump of an unknown black material. It is surprisingly warm and strangely soft to the touch. Use this item to reverse Hollowing.

When gazing closely at the effigy, one starts to perceive a human's appearance. It is said that the appearance you see is your own true form.
Familiar? Similar? Seems Manus' legacy lives on...

The game is looking to be a sequel, occurring after the link the fire ending. Evidence for this that the bonfires are still lit and other references to the past game are made through other items. Though to be sure, nothing is certain in a Souls game. I cannot wait to dig into this game. Get hype.
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,176
0
0
endtherapture said:
So there's basically 3 types of giants who are all giants but different sizes?
1. Small, man sized "giants" like the Witches of Izalith and Havel?
2. Medium giants but bigger than humans like Artorias, Ornstein and Gwyn?
3. Big giants like Smogh and the giant Blacksmith?
I wouldn't get too fussed about the giant classifications.

At some point, it just becomes a video game. I don't mean that you shouldn't keep asking these questions. But also take into consideration that video games tend to make enemies and especially bosses bigger than the player to be imposing and look challenging. This is done almost all the time in MMO's, for example.

I don't think Ornstein is a giant, though Smough might be. I think the only real giants are the ones in Anor Londo, the ones atop Sen's Fortress, and the skeletons int the tomb of the giants.