K. So what's your point? Yea, I know that you can beat those bosses, and the ghosts, and the wasps. Good use of equivocation. Target is not the same as lock on to you, fine. I have to fight some enemies without the benefit of locking on. Because those things can be overcome, describing the game as fair is either inaccurate, or pointless.ccdohl said:
If fair just means that you can beat the game, then wooptie doo, every other game is fair too. If fair means that the odds are always even, then it's inaccurate because sometimes I can't lock on (using the implemented target lock), there are two guys, or there are bosses that will one-shot me, and the odds are not even.[/quote]
You're right, fair does mean that it's always even and in that sense, it's not. You have the advantage, it's not "fair" to the bosses. Sure, they can instant kill you, but they can only instant kill you in avoidable, predicable ways that they have to telegraph before using. Sure, it seems not fair when they actually hit you, but they give you ample opportunity to avoid such hits, and more often than not make themselves vulnerable by doing so.
My point, is that everything that seems unfair to you, is limited and/or comes with a great weakness to compensate. The only issue is whether or not you're up to the task of identifying and taking advantage of those weaknesses.
