David Jaffe Lashes Out at CNN Anchor

Recommended Videos

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
dyre said:
Ugh, really? Who needs government censorship when media corporations are so willing to do it to themselves?
Yeah, TWC announced they'd be dropping it like seconds after the sale went through. Unfortunately, Time Warner is like a third of the market. It's a fairly big deal.
 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
Here's a video I found that actually talks about the reason why news media keeps coming down hard on gamers: http://youtu.be/5uwAo8lcAC4
For those who don't want to take the time to watch it, here's the gist of it: The news networks are owned by movie and TV corporations, which consider video games to be competition. They are targeting video games in an effort to stigmatize their competition and pressure people into demanding legislature that will cripple the industry.
There are other good points in the video, but that's the main one that we ought to be realizing.
 

Imperioratorex Caprae

Henchgoat Emperor
May 15, 2010
5,499
0
41
Zachary Amaranth said:
dyre said:
Thankfully, we have the BBC here too. Or, at least some cable providers have it. Also, I think al-Jazeera might be coming over too, since they recently bought a channel here.
And already one of the largest cable providers has announced they're going to drop Current TV, the channel they bought.

amaranth_dru said:
Folks please note: This is CNN not FOX news reporting this garbage. A good sign that major media outlets care less about truth in journalism and more about inciting flame wars. In other words, ALL news channels are troll-bait and untrustworthy.
Half-right. It's not about truth, it's about making money. Ratings equal money, and sensationalism equals ratings. This isn't about a flame war so much as riding the game wave. Emotions are high and this is the easy way to use it to their advantage.

Of course, Jaffe being an excitable tool probably makes it even easier.
My statement is this: I don't subscribe to TV anchors who seem to have the need to interject their personal "expert" opinion usually way out of context and way out of line for their station.
I don't trust those people in the mainstream media attempt to do the same sensationalist attention grabbing horseshit. Anchors to "on-site" reporters are for the most part guilty. These days it seems to be that we need a tragedy to fire us up.
My biggest issue right now is that people latch on to a tragedy to exploit it to get their agendas pushed through. The video age "debate" on that CNN thing was just ridiculous.
They don't make good journalists. I feel like a lot of these journalists are left wing but I feel as a reporter you are supposedd
 

13thforswarn

New member
Jul 11, 2009
208
0
0
My blood is boiling... Did anyone get experience points for killing a prostitute in GTA? The only thing I got was a star and 4 police cruisers chasing me...
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,156
0
0
Wow did they actually stuff 3 gun ads into their "news" segment, that is just amazing, also not at all indicative of who fills their bank accounts.
 

Momoe

New member
Oct 4, 2010
2
0
0
Ironically, it's precisely this kind of sensationalist journalism that provokes ever more mass shootings. It gives weight and importance to pathetic people that thought to buy credibility for their problems by shooting people. It turns these callous murderers into victims, anti-heroes even, insidiously targeted by a billion dollar industry. It outlines, in excruciating detail, how tragically easy it is to become instantly the most important thing on an entire country's minds (at least until the next shooting).
 

Chairman Miaow

CBA to change avatar
Nov 18, 2009
2,091
0
0
You win points for killing prostitutes in GTA? I didn't even know there were points in GTA! I must really suck at it :(
 

MrBaskerville

New member
Mar 15, 2011
871
0
0
I won´t comment on whether all this violence is harmful in someway or not, but if it turned us into serial killers, wouldn´t school shootings be happening everywhere and not just Finland, Germany and USA? That kinda reveals that there must be some other root of the problem.

Aside from that, i find it kinda fucked up that you can buy an assault rifle. Who the hell needs an assault rifle?
 

Slash2x

New member
Dec 7, 2009
503
0
0
2 things

1. Good on you sir for calling her bullshit. It amazes me how much BS the news media makes up as a "fact" I was in a sandy foreign country and the various news networks never had valid report of what was happening. They would talk about how much better things were getting and show "live feeds" for what was happening. Never mind that the ENTIRE day we were getting shot at and mortared, large sections of the city were on fire. But hey get back to the chow hall and there is CNN or FOX saying "Well it was a calm day finally in the city, it really shows that the war is going better." Then a week later we are at a calm point and spent the last 2 weeks with no activity. Oh look a "live feed" again "THE ENTIRE CITY IS ENGAGED IN WHAT LOOKS LIKE A GIANT FIREFIGHT THERE ARE PEOPLE DEAD IN THE STREETS AND EXPLOSIONS EVERYWHERE!!!" The press is ONLY concerned with getting ratings they have NO interest in getting the "truth" for the people.

2. Never ceases to amaze me how many people defend the news idiots in the comments. These people are saying you are killers in training because you play a damn game on a screen. They do not deserve your protection.
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,720
0
0
Jaffe, you are awesome, do not change a thing.

Burnett, you suck and I want you to gargle highly corrosive acid as penance.
 

HippySteve

New member
Oct 4, 2012
65
0
0
Gizmo1990 said:
amaranth_dru said:
Folks please note: This is CNN not FOX news reporting this garbage. A good sign that major media outlets care less about truth in journalism and more about inciting flame wars. In other words, ALL news channels are troll-bait and untrustworthy.
I really feel bad for you Americans that you have to live with this kind of journalism. How does anyone in your country get any facts?

Thank god that in England we have the BBC. Hell, televised media journalists are not even allowed to state their political opinions in our country. Plus while we do have biased media it is all confined to newspapers, so we can just ignore all of them.
We have to cross-reference all our news. It's awful. More work than it's worth, really.
 

Iron Criterion

New member
Feb 4, 2009
1,271
0
0
ForgottenPr0digy said:
StriderShinryu said:
Dr. Pollack deserves some major props here. Sure, he's not necessarily a fan of games and didn't know enough about GTA to call her on her BS line about "points" stolen from Jack Tnompson (he also didn't mention the rather important fact that games like GTA and CoD aren't meant for kids anyway), but he still stood by the facts when pressed. And, after all that, to have his comments labelled as provocative? Sheesh...
so damn true I saw this interview line on CNN earlier today

you don't "score points" for killing a hooker in GTA. Their are no points in GTA(expect for multi-player modes where you kill other people)

and it seems like the only two games kids play are GTA or COD
If I was in Dr. Pollack's position I would have called her out on her attitude: "oh, I'm sorry I didn't realize you are an expert in psychology. No sense in me being here then."
 

acewolf1569

New member
Jun 14, 2010
14
0
0
Hah. I don't know if anyone has said this, but the video they used of GTA was one of my favorite youtubers, SSoHPKC. He put out a video talking about it if anyone's interested: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mq4mXSQgPo
 

Neonsilver

New member
Aug 11, 2009
289
0
0
vid87 said:
I played and replayed the interview and compared the points made in the main article with Burnett's wording - I really don't think she was preaching "gaming makes killers" as absolute fact. At all. When she said "...it's accepted as fact..." she prefixed it with "A lot of people say...". That and her reading the senator's statement on the Norway shooter (as we covered on this site as true that he claimed gaming was his training tool - why he said could be a separate argument) leads me to believe she was reiterating other points being made about the topic and touching on a perception that is still prevalent in our society, after which she asked her guest if he can confirm it or not. Admittedly the only reason I can think for her to press on with the GTA questioning, aside from demonizing, was because the network needed to fill time and they had a clip they could show, which I agree would be good argument against 24-hour news cycle broadcasting (filling time with useless crap) but I didn't see that as trying to bully Dr. Pollack into conceding to that view. Also, did anyone find his quip at the end (6:06) about GTA or other games possibly causing "domestic violence" or making people "stand back" from fights weird?
While I aggree that she wasn't exactly preaching gaming makes killers, that she was just questioning and cited other people.
Her questions and the way they are worded, give gaming a very negative undertone.

That quote shows that quite well:
It's accepted as fact that these violent games - and by the way, they are horrifically violent - is why we are seeing this seemingly [sic] explosion in mass shootings.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
The good news is that only like, three people still watch CNN these days, so her ignorant views weren't seen by too many people.
 

Spartan448

New member
Apr 2, 2011
539
0
0
The only problem I have with Burnett's interview is the opening statement. That could have been worded a little differently. The rest of the execution, however, was spot on. When you interview someone, you always have to challenge what they're saying. This puts them in a position where they either admit a lie or simply offer more explaination into whatever they just said. Saying in the opening "It's an accepted fact that..." is never a good way to open an interview. And it's also obvious that Burnett was not happy with her guest's response, but that seems to be a personal thing. If the opening statement was reworded, this would be a very fair and balanced interview. The psycologist more than made up for Burnett's opening statement, and during an interview, the viewer pays attention to what the interviewee says on a subject, as they are usually the authoritative source.
 

Formica Archonis

Anonymous Source
Nov 13, 2009
2,312
0
0
RJ 17 said:
The good news is that only like, three people still watch CNN these days, so her ignorant views weren't seen by too many people.
But all three of them are Congressmen.



Personally, I'm waiting to see if any bronies update their Erin fanart from a while back, seeing as most of them are also gamers. Make her a little more Diamond-Tiara-running-the-newspaper, you know.

Actually, nah, that'd just make the problem worse.
 

Anti-American Eagle

HAPPENING IMMINENT
Legacy
May 2, 2011
3,772
8
13
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Thank you Mr. Jaffe, thank you sir for being our voice in a world of slandering liars.