So it wouldn't be sexist were it the torso of, say, a male with chiseled abs?godofslack said:snnnnip
It's the combination of violence and titillation that's the problem.EcoEclipse said:Here's how I look at it: if it were a male torso, nobody would be crying misandry.
That said, I think it's kind of poorly done. Look at that bellybutton. And her breasts look like bad implants. The ribs are poorly realized as well. I wouldn't want this sitting on my desk. Looks like something I could get at a novelty shop for a tenner. It's gross to look at, and not because of the gore.So it wouldn't be sexist were it the torso of, say, a male with chiseled abs?godofslack said:snnnnip
Realistically, this woman's bikini top probably would have been torn off, at least partially. So leaving the breasts in tact is a measure of self-censorship.
Couldn't have said it better myself.godofslack said:It's clearly and indisputably sexist, it's a statue of a woman removed of all the non-sexual body parts, all of which are intact despite the ravaged state of the rest of her, covered in copious amounts of blood and labelled ZOMBIE BAIT. Just wow, I can not believe that anyone ever would think this is something you want associated with a commercial product.
There is no fuss, just some people who pretend there is. There's nothing wrong with this figure, it's for the dedicated zombie fans out there. Not my cup of tea, but to each his own I guess.ShinyCharizard said:I reckon it's pretty damn cool. Don't see what all the fuss is about.
You don't think it's convenient then that they happen to use a pair of luscious tits as bait, instead of, say, a foot? And if we're playing zombie fishing, shouldn't there be a hook or a wire going through the body to suspend it?Misiok said:The CE edition is called Zombie BAIT. What's a good bait to lure away zombies from a location you don't really want them to be in? Usually some dead body parts, or, like in this case, a dismembered torso. It does make sense - the name and the game the sculpture is sold with is about zombies, dismembering them and gore. Them apologizing just means they're saving face cause' they didn't expect such an outcry from non-fans/anyone that haven't played the game (cause' if you had you'd know the context of it).
There never was going to be a man's torso though, was there? That would be too gay, or too much of a concession to the fact that women might be playing the game. The devs wondered what statue would sell best to their audience, and someone chipped in from the back and shouted "a statue of some tits".Tuesday Night Fever said:Frankly, I think it's absurd that if it's a female brutalized torso it's considered shock value but if it's a male brutalized torso it's no big deal. It should be shocking and disgusting either way.BloatedGuppy said:So, thoughts? Do you find this misogynistic? Do you think it was deliberately misogynistic, in an attempt to gather some attention via shock? Do you think a hacked up female torso with a pneumatic bosom is just a tried and true horror convention, and they're just playing to their audience? Do you think the statue is neat? Do you think it's ugly? Would you buy this thing?
I tells you, it's part of the americans master plan. I mean, no arms and no head? It's threat towards the queen! They want all brittish dead!Rawne1980 said:That is just downright disgraceful.
That is the most disturbing thing i've ever seen.
I mean, what woman in her right mind would wear a Union Jack bikini?
I know us English folk usually feel like tits but come on.
That is what offends me the most.Phasmal said:And it's pretty piss-poor designed too.
Clearly they just went TITTAYS! and went with that.
Badly made tittays.