Deadliest Warrior suggestions.

[viranimus]

Well I think that the show needs an overhaul. Personally the first 30 minutes or so is tedious. Only thing I found enjoyable is watching the final showdown. So tweak the first 30 minutes of the show to be something less mythbuster-y

Beyond that.. i Think its time they took the season of the show, and turn it into a tournement, instead of just one on one bouts. EDIT: as in each episode is a match in the bracket. Keeps going until the bracket is completed, which would end up in about the same ammount of episodes. Sure there would be some severe mismatches, but at the same time I think you would see some surprising upsets too.

 

[Samuel Adams]

I'm surprised they didn't do Ninja Vs. Pirate. AND WHOSE IDEA WAS IT TO DO SPARTAN VS. NINJA?!
A fully armored Spartan versus a ninja?! That was not even a fair episode.

 

[Godhead]

How about they make the show somewhat accurate.

 

[Thedayrecker]

I'd like them to be not idiots and actually pair Pirate against Ninja, instead of Pirate vs (french) Knight and Ninja vs Spartan.

I second this!

OT: I've never caught the show, but it looks interesting.

 

[EMO_of_LiGHT]

A Czech Hussite vs. A Saracen from the Third Crusade. Both groups at one point openly defide the church and even managed to give it a solid thrashing, and also because hardly anyone in America REALLY knows Jan Hus, and I think it might be a way to at least make him somewhat more recognizable (how many people can truly say they knew Vlad Tepes was the inspiration for Dracula? That's what I thought).

 

[martin's a madman]

It will probably never happen but Joseph Stalin vs Adolf Hitler.

Haha... didn't it already happen? Or you mean like a bar fight?

 

[martin's a madman]

Canadian JTF2 vs British SAS

That is like throwing a kitting into a minefield the SAS would wipe the floor with JTF2

Well, considering they are two countries who more or less would have access to any advantage the other could have as well as training, I think you may have exaggerated your simile.

Once you match two immensely rich countries where the only theatre which would experience a massive difference is a full scale war due to population, reducing the numbers to an elite squad of agents trained by two rich powers with access to the same level of technology is a fair fight.

The point is, that after a certain point you can't quite get significantly better if you are two highly developed nations. Outside of full scale war of course.

 

[martin's a madman]

A Czech Hussite vs. A Saracen from the Third Crusade. Both groups at one point openly defide the church and even managed to give it a solid thrashing, and also because hardly anyone in America REALLY knows Jan Hus, and I think it might be a way to at least make him somewhat more recognizable (how many people can truly say they knew Vlad Tepes was the inspiration for Dracula? That's what I thought).

I can say that!

 

[GrimTuesday]

Can we redo the Celt vs. Persian Immortal because that was a load of horse shit. I mean come on I found the Immortal's spear to be very lacking and the "experts" had a giant hard-on for a weapon that is less versatile then the other weapon.

 

[Redlin5_v1legacy]

Goth vs Emo...

Oh wait, its been done.


The results were disappointing, the science was all wrong! Zombies clearly beat doppelgangers!

Seriously, I want to see Samurai vs Roman Warrior.

 

[Berethond]

Royal Marines vs US marines

They don't really compare, the U.S. Marines aren't Special Forces like the Royal Marines. It would have to be U.S. Marines vs. British Army or Force Recon vs. Royal Marines.

 

[Toaster Hunter]

Mongol vs Roman legionar

 

[Airsoftslayer93]

Royal marines arent actually Special forces, admitadly they do have the longest non special forces training course in the world, but they arent special forces

 

[Arsen]

Starving child from India VS Ghengis Khan...

Okay seriously...

Landsknecht (German Mercenary) VS Mongol
Irish Celt VS Turkish Raider

 

[CouchCommando]

Australian bush ranger Vs American old west outlaw gunslinger.

 

[martin's a madman]

Canadian JTF2 vs British SAS

That is like throwing a kitting into a minefield the SAS would wipe the floor with JTF2

Well, considering they are two countries who more or less would have access to any advantage the other could have as well as training, I think you may have exaggerated your simile.

Once you match two immensely rich countries where the only theatre which would experience a massive difference is a full scale war due to population, reducing the numbers to an elite squad of agents trained by two rich powers with access to the same level of technology is a fair fight.

The point is, that after a certain point you can't quite get significantly better if you are two highly developed nations. Outside of full scale war of course.

you try really hard to make your self sound smart......also take in that the Canadien army is a piece of shit then you'll see why the SAS is better.

No, this is the way I speak. You're not trying very hard, but you're coming off as rather ignorant.

You don't offer any information, you use baseless opinions and you think that is good enough to make a statement.
Offer actual information to suggest that the Canadian army (because there is an "a" in it) is a poor organisation with anything that couldn't be applied to any army besides population differences. If you can do that, then I'll admit you aren't just grossly misinformed and angry.

 

[Busdriver580]

I would love to see them actually do research.

 

[bubba145]

CS Infantry versus British Infantry. ultimate reversal of what they wanted. i want to see the Lematt get some kills.

 

[demoman_chaos]

Seriously, I want to see Samurai vs Roman Warrior.

Roman would win for the same reason the Spartan won, the big shield. The samurai has no way to best the shield and armor of the Roman (very few samurai actually used a kanebo since they were so heavy and had a large recovery time) while the Roman could easily get by the samruai's very light armor (if a slashing weapon can best it, a piercing weapon can easily and the gladius was meant for stabbing attacks).
And before you say anything, the katana would be neigh worthless. It is very ineffective against armor. The samurai in reality would not have bested a viking since they are very good warriors and well armored. They are also not dirty barbarians like the ones who are scared of them say.
A Roman squad would crush a samruai squad, but 1v1 the samurai might stand a chance (though a small one).

I'm surprised they didn't do Ninja Vs. Pirate. AND WHOSE IDEA WAS IT TO DO SPARTAN VS. NINJA?!
A fully armored Spartan versus a ninja?! That was not even a fair episode.

Guns is why. The knight's armor allowed him to not be shot down while a ninja doesn't have that luxury. That episode also grinds my gears. Only 1 pirate weapon could penetrate the armor, and it didn't do it very well. Plate armor+ring mail undercoat+cotton padding to soften blunt impact+kite shield=no damage to the knight. Every knight weapon was a sure kill, but no pirate weapon could consistently kill.

 

[the lapalminator]

homeless guy vs/ buisness ceo