As far as I can see America has been steadily reverting to the attitudes of the 80's. Inane foreign policy, appalling economic ideals and repressive social attitudes. If Romney manages to win out, then this will only get worse
And yet, anthropologists themselves disagree on the basis of culture. I'm not sure why you think that something being a subject of study makes it legitimate.RoBi3.0 said:LOL, culture is not a myth. Google Anthropology and you will find tons of information on the science devoted to the study of culture.
But my point is that groups of people don't share beliefs. You might think you share a belief with somebody, but dig deeper, and you'll almost certainly find that you disagree with them on some level. This is why we have disruption in society, because ultimately there are people who will refuse to go along with what your "culture" claims. Otherwise, how could we get rid of slavery, fascism, and other cultural impositions?RoBi3.0 said:And to answer Rainboq cultures basic definition is: socially transmitted information that shapes human behavior. It is a complexed concept of a group of people's shared values and beliefs
A typo does not mean I don't know my native tongue. And before I can answer that question, let me break down what a symbol is. A symbol is comprised of, the signified and the signifier. The signified is the thing in question and the signifier is the particular thing used to signify. For example, the signifier of American politics signifies is a wrapper that encompasses things like the Democrats and Republicans, the senate, the house of republicans and the president, etc. So yes they are symbols.Aardvaarkman said:Clearly, someone has never studied English. "Sphere's" of culture? Also, how do any of the things I mention not involve shared symbols? Since you advocated the idea, please tell me what the shared symbols of US culture are.Rainboq said:Someone has evidently never taken an anthropology course. Culture is a set of shared symbols across a group of people. Hence the idea of sphere's of culture, every set of symbols has a group who observes it, which fall within its radius.
But you can't offer any specific details on those shared symbols for some reason. "Politics" is not a symbol. "Constitution" is not a symbol. "News Media" is not a symbol. You need to be more specific on what forms those take. What is the "symbol" of US politics, for example?Rainboq said:And every person subscribes to more than one culture because every thing has its own set of symbols. So some examples of american culture would be their politics, their constitution, their news media. While these examples aren't limited to the USA, they certainly are a part of it.
Culture is not set in stone it is ever evolving just like humans themselves, that is why it is complex. That is why we can get rid of slavery and why languages evolve. Yes in a population as large as The United States you will find varied opinions on what is consider normal or acceptable, but that is where sub-culture come into play. And by no means is culture an exact guideline for how people are going to act, individuals still have freewill after all.Aardvaarkman said:And yet, anthropologists themselves disagree on the basis of culture. I'm not sure why you think that something being a subject of study makes it legitimate.RoBi3.0 said:LOL, culture is not a myth. Google Anthropology and you will find tons of information on the science devoted to the study of culture.
But my point is that groups of people don't share beliefs. You might think you share a belief with somebody, but dig deeper, and you'll almost certainly find that you disagree with them on some level. This is why we have disruption in society, because ultimately there are people who will refuse to go along with what your "culture" claims. Otherwise, how could we get rid of slavery, fascism, and other cultural impositions?RoBi3.0 said:And to answer Rainboq cultures basic definition is: socially transmitted information that shapes human behavior. It is a complexed concept of a group of people's shared values and beliefs
I would love to see this little gem be on SteamAC10 said:I would love if steam got a ton of VN's translated to it (eroge or not).
So it's ok to ban a game from greenlight because you personally don't want to buy it.Sean Strife said:While I myself have absolutely no issue with sex games whatsoever, I will not shell out money for said games, which is why I gotta side with Valve on this: why would I shell out money for something that is, essentially, a Newgrounds Flash Portal-quality game. I say Flash Portal because Newgrounds games themselves can actually be really good (Castle Crashers, anyone?).
Also, everybody bringing up the Witcher games, GTA, Mass Effect, etc... I do believe the sexual stuff in those games is a little thing called "optional", whereas in this game, it's the whole point of it. Yes the aforementioned games have sex in them, but it doesn't mean you absolutely have to play those things.
Yeah but if they had that then you'd just accuse them of being heteronormative.Bara_no_Hime said:The game is also kind of sexist. Where's the mode where I can play a generic female socialite and seduce one of four hot men, huh?
No, it's okay to ban a game that's a glorified Newgrounds dating sim. If I wanted to play that, I'd swing on over to Newgrounds and play it. I look at Steam for more "legitimate" games, so to speak.danon said:So it's ok to ban a game from greenlight because you personally don't want to buy it.Sean Strife said:While I myself have absolutely no issue with sex games whatsoever, I will not shell out money for said games, which is why I gotta side with Valve on this: why would I shell out money for something that is, essentially, a Newgrounds Flash Portal-quality game. I say Flash Portal because Newgrounds games themselves can actually be really good (Castle Crashers, anyone?).
Also, everybody bringing up the Witcher games, GTA, Mass Effect, etc... I do believe the sexual stuff in those games is a little thing called "optional", whereas in this game, it's the whole point of it. Yes the aforementioned games have sex in them, but it doesn't mean you absolutely have to play those things.