No, but all the teams in the same 'league' are playing at the same difficulty level.The_root_of_all_evil said:If Leicester are drawn against Man United and Bolton Wanderers in the cup, does Leicester get more points for scoring goals against Man U because it's harder?Cowabungaa said:Not really seeing how. You win, you get more points, you get a better rank in the tournament, and you win the cup if you have the most points. Not really seeing what's so insane about that. How else are you supposed to win?The_root_of_all_evil said:No wonder I gave up on sport a long time ago. That's insane.
If they beat both, that's better than beating one. I get that. But why should they get more for beating harder things? Does Man U get less points for beating Bolton rather than Liverpool?
Or to put it another way, is it fair to only be able to get the F.A.Cup by beating Manchester United multiple times, no matter how many points/cups/gems/players you have?
(Of course, this is all hypothetical because Leicester can't beat Accrington Stanley at the moment)
There are usually several leagues, with the best league profiting the most from advertisers, and the best players making the most money.
People playing with a few friends in the park don't make any money at all. An inter school league might give trophies or medals to the winners. Set up a few clubs, and an inter city league might be able to afford cash prices. Set up an inter-state league, and you start drawing even more money (from fees, advertisers and the like).
But not everyone gets to play in the more profitable leagues, because for the people watching it's boring, and as the stakes get higher so does the incentive to improve your odds hiring the better players. Who get paid more for being better.