I'm sorry, I'm really not trying to be a jerk here, but I just don't get it. I'm not sure I buy that making Link female accomplishes nothing, but even if I grant that it did, my first instinct is to ask, "So what? Does making Link male accomplish anything? If so, what? And why does the choice have to accomplish something?"endtherapture said:Making Link female accomplishes nothing. Why can't we play as Tetra or Sheikh or Midna or one of the many strong female Zelda characters? Link has been male for over 20 years. He's known as Link, Link the blonde-haired guy in a green cap with a sword and shield. That's Link.
Gender-bending accomplishes nothing. It wouldn't be a true strong or original female character because female Link would always be known as female Link. Do you not see the problem in that? It's a very weak character. "Our female character is exactly the same a our male character but with feminine features."
I also think your second paragraph makes a lot of assumptions. As best I understand you--and please correct me if I'm wrong--you're arguing that the writing of the imaginary game we're talking about will have certain qualities that make Link indistinguishable from a male character, because otherwise your complaint about a male character with feminine features makes no sense to me. Why do you give the writers so little credit? I will grant without hesitation that the only Link I can think of who had any personality is the Hero of Wind, but it has happened once and can therefore happen again. Why can't there be a female Link who meets your standard of femininity in behavior?
And actually, while I'm on the topic, what is your standard of femininity in behavior?