im even ranking universe at war high then Sc2Lucifron said:Oh come on...cWg | Konka said:Tbh I though Starcraft 2 was the worse RTS I've played ever
It cannot possibly be the WORST rts you have ever played. It is too polished.
im even ranking universe at war high then Sc2Lucifron said:Oh come on...cWg | Konka said:Tbh I though Starcraft 2 was the worse RTS I've played ever
It cannot possibly be the WORST rts you have ever played. It is too polished.
I like how nobody noticed I added this in there loleuro2019 said:EDIT: My bad flop was the wrong term, I just mean a disappointment. The game was too high grossing to flop
woah, what? A Re-skinned Warcraft 3?? I'm not to sure we played the same game. Warcraft 3 was much more focused on single units and heros while StarCraft 2 has much larger armies. Completely different gameplay styles. I could understand it being compared to StarCraft 1, but not Warcraft 3. StarCraft 2 did not feel bloated, at least to me. Were there a lot of units and other stuff, yes, but StarCraft 1 had that too. I like StarCraft 2 a bit more, honestly. It feels more balanced and faster paced.euro2019 said:I know this is wayyyy late but I remember a time when I was just itching for Starcraft 2 to come out. When I saw the first official trailer I was all excited and couldn't wait for it to come out. Finally it came out, I went and bought it on the first day it came out, and I haven't been able to get into it. At least not the way I thought I'd get into it. It felt like they just re-skinned Warcraft 3 with a Starcraft title and added better 3D modeling and a physics engine.
Maybe the hype over the years built up this bar that was impossible to achieve? But it seems like the game has disappointed me completely. I still have more fun playing the original SC than I do SC2. Maybe it's because my computer can't handle the game at max settings? Maybe because the first SC seemed more simple and less bloated? What are your guy's opinions on the game, for those of you whom have played both?
EDIT: My bad flop was the wrong term, I just mean a disappointment. The game was too high grossing to flop
My mistake then, I thought you meant something like a proxy barracks. In that case, I agree with your point. It's not exclusive to Terrans though, but a hell lot easier to do as Terran.AndyFromMonday said:Yes it is. You're purposely denying someone a well earned victory when you know you cannot win. This happened to me way to many times. I beat out a terran player only to have no means through which to build say a viking. The dude lifts up his command center, puts it in a place I cannot reach and basically denies me victory even though I won. It's a delaying tactic and that has no place in a multiplayer game. You lost, deal with it. I'm glad Blizzard is actually baning people for using such a tactic.TerranReaper said:I can understand if you can't be competitive in the multiplayer, but are you really going to call that cheating? It's like calling camping in FPS cheating, it's frustrating to deal against but it's not cheating.
Well he should've changed the title of the thread itself. I'm not gonna sift through too many posts before I post, it's pointless.ciortas1 said:snip