ReincarnatedFTP said:
Lonan said:
josemlopes said:
TheNamlessGuy said:
I wouldn't do it.
You know, if you don't want to go to jail for being a Pedophile.
OT: Well, as long as it's legal and they're both happy with it I couldn't care less
To be a Pedophile she would need to be 16 because there must be a gap of 5 years
A pedophile is someone who is attracted to pre-pubescent children. 16 is not pre-pubescent.
Yeah, but you try building a morally outraged lynch mob by shouting "You disgusting ephebophile!"
Exactly, keep it simple for the sake of the stupid. Fuck that. Here's another reality, you don't stop developing until you reach 25, so 22 and 16 would hardly make the 22 year old a ephebophile since they're both still developing. Biologically, they are kids. I don't buy arbitrary age designations like 5 years. I've been judged by the government by my age for 18 years, and frankly I'm not much different now than I was when I was still a "kid."
You know what the age of consent should be? Common sense. There was a story about a 15 year old from a town of 176, with a school of 40 grade 7-12 students in Saskatchewan. He had sex with his 37 year old teacher. The age of consent in Canada is now 16, so she will have the mark of a child molester over her for the rest of her life and spend at LEAST 10 years in jail for her "crimes." Then there's 50 year old men anally raping 9 year old boys until they bleed. Both are such terrible crimes that they deserve at LEAST 10 years in jail. The government is so fucking retarded that this is effectively considered the same thing. Child molestation. 90% of Canadians are heterosexual, so if you think that a male 15 year old teenager having consensual sex with a 37 year old woman is molestation, you are at least 90% retarded, probably even more because of the bisexuals. Bottom line.
That's my rant.
Not really what we were talking about, but there it is.