The following post comes from someone who's met and spoke to Ryan a fair few times in real life, as a member of the university's space and astronomy society (which he's the president of).
Ryan's a solid guy, and I have no doubt that he sincerely believes that this project is viable and valid. He's also a really smart fellow. The problem I've encountered is that he uncritically seems to accept the MarsOne premise; I've yet to see a bone of cynicism in him about the entire endeavour yet. He's always seemed motivated primarily by the exciting prospect of going to Mars, rather than the real logistical challenges MarsOne faces. The way he expresses it is that he'd rather try for a Mars mission than have no Mars mission at all; he doesn't seem to consider the potential backfiring this mission could have if it topples due to ineptitude or there is a critical failure (if it even gets that far).
He's passionate about space exploration in all forms. He just seems to lack the inclination to state that there are better ways of going about it, and all shots at it must somehow be good.
MarsOne is dubious at best. The only decent Mars plan I've seen is Zubrin's Mars Direct programme. It's all well and good to say all attempts to shoot at Mars are worthwhile, but I doubt that'll be a good thing to say when an Apollo 1 happens and all endeavours to Mars are deemed too dangerous to go ahead for a generation.
Ryan's a solid guy, and I have no doubt that he sincerely believes that this project is viable and valid. He's also a really smart fellow. The problem I've encountered is that he uncritically seems to accept the MarsOne premise; I've yet to see a bone of cynicism in him about the entire endeavour yet. He's always seemed motivated primarily by the exciting prospect of going to Mars, rather than the real logistical challenges MarsOne faces. The way he expresses it is that he'd rather try for a Mars mission than have no Mars mission at all; he doesn't seem to consider the potential backfiring this mission could have if it topples due to ineptitude or there is a critical failure (if it even gets that far).
He's passionate about space exploration in all forms. He just seems to lack the inclination to state that there are better ways of going about it, and all shots at it must somehow be good.
MarsOne is dubious at best. The only decent Mars plan I've seen is Zubrin's Mars Direct programme. It's all well and good to say all attempts to shoot at Mars are worthwhile, but I doubt that'll be a good thing to say when an Apollo 1 happens and all endeavours to Mars are deemed too dangerous to go ahead for a generation.