I demand that this person changes his legal name to Ronald then we can all sing his favorite song.
Well its internets way of arguing it seems. take somone elses points and refute them one by one. Though it still does not make me trust Mars One.
Well its internets way of arguing it seems. take somone elses points and refute them one by one. Though it still does not make me trust Mars One.
I will trust the person making the best arguments and grounding them in proof rather than appeal to authority.robert022614 said:I will tend to trust a doctor over a 21 year old student.
The problem with this metric is that by the time we get a meaninful answer the answer no longer matters.008Zulu said:Here's the metric we should use; If it falls apart and people don't get their money back, it's a scam.
It would only hold any ground if all 21 year olds and all professors had same knowledge. which they do not. A 40 year old professor can be far more out of touch with reality than a 21 year old student in some cases, which means that basing authority on age alone never was and never will be a good idea. which is why age rating systems dont work.Realitycrash said:This actually got be pondering whether or not this is a legitimate argument or not. Afterall, based on induction, 21-year olds will tend to have a lot less experience and knowledge than old doctors, and thus merits our trust. On the other hand, age and experience does not logically equal truth of reasoning.