CarlMinez said:
Alterego-X said:
CarlMinez said:
Alterego-X said:
CarlMinez said:
Alterego-X said:
CarlMinez said:
This is probably, regardless of the motivation, the worst, most clusmy and insensitive way to handle this issue imaginable.
Let me guess. You didn't actually check out HOW it is handled in the plot.
Jesus Christ, I read the article and it's a disabled girl dating game. What more do I need to know?
For example the fact that out of the dozens of people in this thread who tried to start reading it, even for a single hour, EVERY SINGLE ONE reported that it's a very well-written, sensitive, serious romantic story.
(Or at least the ones who told something about it's quality, other than "this and that route was my favourite", and similar comments)
I think you need to check out my first comment and find out what exactly I was criticizing this idea for, because it wasn't the lack of a "well-written" romantic storyline.
You criticized THE WAY it handles the issue, without knowing anything about the way it handles the issue other than the fact that it exists.
I criticized the game for handling this delicate issue to begin with. Obviously, I wasn?t too sure that a Japanese interactive porno named ?Disability Girl?, sprung forth from the boards of 4chan, would do a good job dealing with the problems of being disabled.
If you?ve played the game and disagree with me then that?s fine though it?s hardly going to convince me to play it and even if I did, I doubt I?d think any differently of it.
No it's not. If you would have tried it, or even read 1-2 pages of this thread, you would know that it's neither Japanese, nor interactive, nor a porno.
It's a visual novel, a novel-like linear written story with background images. The only interactive element is that you can choose, often with a single click, which of the five character's story to read. If you say that there is something *inherently* creepy about that medium, then I can't see how novels or movies would be any different. Basically, you are saying that the very IDEA of a romance story about disabled people can't be handled tastefully.
And it has sex scenes, about one per girl, over the 400.000 word long story. (The Lord of the Rings trilogy is 470 000). That can be turned off. And that every poster here reported to be non-fetishizing, sensitively written, or even awkward.
And the point is not that *I* disagree with you, but that literally everyone who has read it. One deluded pervert can be explained, some poor guy even tried to protect Rapelay, but there were others who tried it for objectivity, and reported that yep, it's disgusting.
But in this situation, your sole uninformed "opinion" against everyone who actually knows how it handles the issue, sounds an awful lot like certain Cooper Lawrence's opinion on Mass Effect.