Oh yeah, Sloth who rescues the Goonies from being forced to jump into the water by... throwing them into the water.And without Chunk, they wouldn’t have got Sloth on their side.
Weirds me out that Brand is Thanos though.
Oh yeah, Sloth who rescues the Goonies from being forced to jump into the water by... throwing them into the water.And without Chunk, they wouldn’t have got Sloth on their side.
Weirds me out that Brand is Thanos though.
HEY YOU GUYSOh yeah, Sloth who rescues the Goonies from being forced to jump into the water by... throwing them into the water.
It's a movie that both fun to watch but try not to think much about it. LIke.....man, how did the ship sit in a damp cave for centuries without falling apart? How did they seal it in like that? WHY WOULD THEY SEAL THEMSELVES IN? Why and how would the pirates set up a convoluted obstacle course that ran for miles when they were sealed into the cave with their ship but they could have opened the cave again by taking a coin off the scale? How do they fall into Haystack rock interior lagoon from above when they would have had to come in from underground? Where's the water coming from for the waterfalls?The Goonies
I'm 31 and had never seen The Goonies, so I'm too old for it now and there's no nostalgia in it for me either. But to the movie's credit it stays fun even if it never gets funny. A lot of it has to do with that Spielbergian breakneck pace (as far as I'm concerned he was puppeting Donner the whole way), a lot of it has to do with the bonkers nature of the plot, which throws in kids on bikes, buried pirate treasure, Indiana Jones gauntlets, comedy Italian mobsters and some kind of sci-fi/horror movie freak apropos of nothing. Things just keep being thrown in out of the blue. It's all very cheesy and corny but ultimately fun and entertaining. I will say all the screaming and falling was getting on my nerves by the end of it though. Could've done without the annoying fat kid.
My assumption re: One Eyed Willy's ship would be that the cave had loads of natural salt deposits. Doesn't explain why the bottom of the ship didn't rot but fuck it, movie magic.It's a movie that both fun to watch but try not to think much about it. LIke.....man, how did the ship sit in a damp cave for centuries without falling apart? How did they seal it in like that? WHY WOULD THEY SEAL THEMSELVES IN? Why and how would the pirates set up a convoluted obstacle course that ran for miles when they were sealed into the cave with their ship but they could have opened the cave again by taking a coin off the scale? How do they fall into Haystack rock interior lagoon from above when they would have had to come in from underground? Where's the water coming from for the waterfalls?
The gems at the end probably didn't matter at all, because that ship alone would have been worth millions, even without the treasure. I mean, a centuries old pirate ship that is still seaworthy to the point it can sail itself unmanned and without maintenance. Historians would pay a fucking fortune for such a find.
Also the geography is fucking weird. Haystack Rock(where Willy's ship is shown sailing out of) is 25 miles from Astoria, where the rest of the film takes place. Also, Astoria isn't nearly as big as it's depicted in the film and the chase in the intro literally has them driving around in circles and then ending up 40 miles away(Astoria isn't on the Pacific, it's on the Columbia a few miles from the Pacific).
On a side note, you can visit the goonies house in Astoria to this day, but people live there and would ask you to be respectful(apparently some of the tourists are dicks and the people living there really don't appreciate it).
Still fun though.
Yeah I can appreciate it not being funny, so much as just fun. I grew up watching that film countless times, and I can't recall laughing, just enjoying the adventure of it. Sort of like the appeal of the early Potter movies. Not so much funny, just A Children's Adventure kind of thing.The Goonies
I'm 31 and had never seen The Goonies, so I'm too old for it now and there's no nostalgia in it for me either. But to the movie's credit it stays fun even if it never gets funny. A lot of it has to do with that Spielbergian breakneck pace (as far as I'm concerned he was puppeting Donner the whole way), a lot of it has to do with the bonkers nature of the plot, which throws in kids on bikes, buried pirate treasure, Indiana Jones gauntlets, comedy Italian mobsters and some kind of sci-fi/horror movie freak apropos of nothing. Things just keep being thrown in out of the blue. It's all very cheesy and corny but ultimately fun and entertaining. I will say all the screaming and falling was getting on my nerves by the end of it though. Could've done without the annoying fat kid.
Goonies 2? When did The Goonies get a sequel?I watch Goonies 1 and 2 back in the day, for the last time I watched those movies was around 97 or 98. I don't remember laughing much. it was around that time when they started airing Big Trouble in Little China a lot on movie channels or TV channels.
Ignore that. That's a Google speak error. Fixing it now.Goonies 2? When did The Goonies get a sequel?
I've never been a fan of the demand of actors to physically be accurate to a role, specifically if doing so puts them in actual, physical harm. Shit like extreme weight loss/gains, damaging your feet for ballet, any of it. It doesn't actually add anything to the performance, and seems to be there just to shut up the "well actually" people who nitpick shit like how many calories it takes to sustain a body mass of that type, and that so and so would be underweight now because biology. Seriously dude? Shut the fuck up, it's a FILM, that person is an ACTOR. They probably did this shot 20 times, with a full crew around. It's NOT REAL. Stop pissing and moaning about stupid details, use your fucking suspension of disbelief, and just enjoy the performance, and stop demanding dangerous requirements from actors, who will only be doing this thing for a short amount of time, and then move on to some other role.Black Swan. I can just tell this movie had so much insurance tape. Portman apparently trained up to eight hours a day for six months, but there are barely any full body shots of her dancing on her toes, because seriously hurting her feet would no doubt be too big a financial risk. The shots are usually farther away, where you can't tell if it's her face or if it's been superimposed on her stunt double. I think she deserved her acclaim, though. Wouldn't keep watching it if the positives didn't outweigh the negatives. I've seen it three times in the last seven or eight years.
8/10
But if she's already trained for it? Surely six months, up to eight hours a day, would have given her some ability that she could have performed without so much insurance tape. Yes, it DOES add something to the role, as Moira Shearer demonstrated in The Red Shoes. You see all of it.I've never been a fan of the demand of actors to physically be accurate to a role, specifically if doing so puts them in actual, physical harm. Shit like extreme weight loss/gains, damaging your feet for ballet, any of it. It doesn't actually add anything to the performance, and seems to be there just to shut up the "well actually" people who nitpick shit like how many calories it takes to sustain a body mass of that type, and that so and so would be underweight now because biology. Seriously dude? Shut the fuck up, it's a FILM, that person is an ACTOR. They probably did this shot 20 times, with a full crew around. It's NOT REAL. Stop pissing and moaning about stupid details, use your fucking suspension of disbelief, and just enjoy the performance, and stop demanding dangerous requirements from actors, who will only be doing this thing for a short amount of time, and then move on to some other role.
One of my favorite examples of this kind of shit, is people who call BS when someone like Wonder Woman bench presses a semi-truck, and they cry "no way!! her arms are too small!" but then superman does the same thing and they are all ok with it "Yeah! those slightly larger muscles are TOTALLY capable of lifting a weight measured in TONS!" It's like "dumbass NEITHER of them are lifting it due to biology, they are lifting it due to super powers, shut up and enjoy the scantily clad people flying around punching space aliens or whatever."
If someone already has the skill set, fine. I'm talking about actively putting them through a rigorous regimen, on an unhealthy time table to fit a filming schedule. And sorry but no, I don't agree that it adds anything unique that having a double can't also accomplish.But if she's already trained for it? Surely six months, up to eight hours a day, would have given her some ability that she could have performed without so much insurance tape. Yes, it DOES add something to the role, as Shearer Moira demonstrated in The Red Shoes.
I'm aware Moira had significantly more ballet experience than Portman and that Portman's role was more emotional.
What is with the hostility?