Discuss and Rate the Last Film You Watched

Is this the first poll?


  • Total voters
    45

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea (6/10)

Like its predecessor, I finally (finally!) found time to do a "proper watch" for this. Unlike its predecessor, I don't really have anything to say that I didn't already say when I last reviewed the film. While the score may have gone up by a point, this is still an "okay" film, whereas its predecessor managed to swim its way into "good" territory when I was giving it my full attention. Anyway, you can read my original review for my full thoughts, and pretty much everything I said here can be applied here, so I'm just going to reiterate some select points:

-Melody is still a better character than Ariel (yes, I stand by that)

-The songs aren't great, and are absolutely terrible at worst, but they're still better than the ones in Ariel's Beginning.

-I'll stand what I said about changing the ending, but things were a bit worse this time around, because compared to the first film, the ending is sluggish in its pace. It's the same basic plot beats but without the flow (no, that isn't a pun) of the first film.

-The animation is absolutely terrible in some places, to the point where some human movements look like contortions. They don't come up much, but when they do, it's noticeable.

So, yeah. It's average. But despite being sub-standard, it's still water under the bridge, as we get to:

The Little Mermaid III: Ariel's Beginning (7/10)

You might recall in the original review that I said that this was best than the original film. Having done 'proper watches' of all three, I'm taking back that statement. Of the three, this is the one film where my estimation has gone down, and while it's still "good," it's only achieving a 7 just because I don't do decimals (if I did, this would be a 6.5). As a ranking, the original trilogy now goes 1>3>2.

Now, I could leave it there, especially since again, I did do a review that you can look up, and most of what I said there still applies to at least some extent, but I'm going to go over some key points here:

-Despite being themed around music, I can't remember the lyrics of a single song, despite only watching it two days ago. Whatever ups and downs the trilogy has, the lyric quality has decreased with every installment.

-Not so the animation quality - visually, this is the best looking of the three films.

-Most importantly, there's tone and theme. I said when I originally reviewed this film is that ultimately, this is a film about depression and familial loss. Having rewatched it now, while I'd still hold that statement as true, it's a statement that's true only in the "technically" sense, because I underestimated just how much crap there is on the sides. Sometimes, the film takes its subject matter seriously, and this time around, it was noticeable how the colouring shifts (bright colours for music, greys and blues elsewhere). Other times, there's just so much crap and whacky hyjinks to deal with, mainly from Marina Del Rey. I can't find any evidence of this actually being the case, but watching this, it honestly feels like there's two different movies welded together given how much the tone clashes between scenes (scenes that, I noticed, have more fade to blacks than a movie this length would necessitate). It's a shame, because if this movie focused more on the mature side of things, then this could have easily been the best of the trilogy, but as it is, it's a flawed compromise.

Anyway, yeah. Finally got the trilogy out of the way.

Lady and the Tramp (5/10)

I know, it's lazy to rely on a YouTube clip in place of actually commenting, but a) this isn't a professional review thread, and b) what can I actually say? This film is all sugar, no spice, and not particuarly nice, nor particuarly nasty. Female dog meets male dog, male dog helps her home, cue drama, cue puppies at the end. It occurs to me while writing this that in many ways, at least within the DAC, it feels like a predecessor to 101 Dalmations or Bolt (animals, dogs or otherwise, are separated from their owners and need to get back), only those movies are better, if not great.

Apart from that...well, there's an interesting technique at the start where we see things from Lady's perspective, of only seeing the legs of her owners, but this is abandoned before the halfway mark, where we see humans in full view. It's a minor point, but noticeable. Also, why does an Italian chef make spagheti and meatballs for dogs? I mean, good for him, but considering that many restaurants operate on very thin profit margins, this seems a bit excessive. Does he serenade every human who comes through his doors, or is it dogs only?

Anyway, yeah. Nothing to say, it's just "bleh" at worst, and "meh" at best. But usual rankings are below.

Rankings

39) The Black Cauldron
38) Dinosaur
37) Cinderella
36) Dumbo
35) Robin Hood
34) The Rescuers
33) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
32) Lady and the Tramp
31) Oliver & Company
30) The Sword in the Stone
29) Peter Pan
28) Sleeping Beauty
27) Pinocchio
26) The Fox and the Hound
25) Pocahontas
24) Bambi
23) Basil, the Great Mouse Detective
22) The Aristocats
21) Frozen II
20) Bolt
19) Wreck-it Ralph: Ralph Breaks the Internet
18) Tarzan
17) Fantasia 2000
16) 101 Dalmations
15) The Jungle Book
14) Alice in Wonderland
13) The Little Mermaid
12) The Emperor’s New Groove
11) Hercules
10) The Hunchback of Notre Dame
9) Fantasia
8) Moana
7) Big Hero 6
6) Beauty and the Beast
5) Treasure Planet
4) Frozen
3) Aladdin
2) The Lion King
1) Zootopia
 

hanselthecaretaker

My flask is half full
Legacy
Nov 18, 2010
8,738
5,905
118
After watching the series finale of Succession on HBO... er... now called Max for some reason, a youtuber posted his top 5 movies to watch for those going through withdrawals from all that intrigue now that the show was over. His number one spot is a movie I love and if you haven't seen it, you should do so ASAP (The Lion in Winter). But he also recommended The Death of Stalin. It is on Tubi and, well, the Drinker says it better than I could. A-


Interesting comment -
Nicoleta Mitchinson
7 months ago (edited)
I lived in USSR. This film was freaking ACCURATE! I literally felt like I was watching the depiction of everything my grandpa would tell us about his life (when some of the worst of USSR atrocities took place, though my childhood wasn’t easy either).

It’s almost scary how well they got the behaviour, the way they dressed, the sets, the hypocrisy, the dramatic acting, the lack of any loyalty or backbone.

My great-grandma almost got raped by a soviet soldier, but my great grandpa was able to save her. They’re animals, worse even. The starvation my country went through, coupled with deportations, and cold blood murder… what you see in the film happened pretty much all the way up to my birth. I can’t explain what a f*cking shithole that was.

Beria was a monster, a rapist, a murderer, and the biggest coward there is. He’d behave all big and powerful with those inferior to him, but cower in front of others with more power. He was one of the biggest POS. Well, all of them were, but he, Stalin, and Lenin certainly took the f*cking cake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorfias

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,224
3,362
118
Antman Quantum Leaps (Disney +)
Went in with very tempered expectations and a lazy need to waste some time. Had a lot of visual confetti, like shapes and colours flying and smashing about and into stuff. Sometimes the colours and shapes looked nice. Sometimes the film stopped to show humans doing emotions. One of them was even a massive floating human face emotion!

Am suspecting there were supposed to be jokes, but only cause they were playing the music of "jokes are happening now, we're doing jokes you dumb twat, you can laugh now?"

I. Did not laugh.

Am aware it's a lost cause to question logic, reason, cause and effect around details etc in this type of film, but that tree fungus in the quantum planet realm has bothered me all night. Who's idea was that?? Do we really need flora to be recognisable even in realms between the building blocks of our reality?

A lost cause, yeah I know.

But also why were the large Antman scenes portrayed with lumbering slow Godzilla weight when they're still super tiny in the super tiny quantum realm, being only just slightly bigger than the other tiny peeps in the tiny quantum realm?

Yeah yeah, ok, lost cause, I get it. It's fine, nevermind.

...

Socialist ants?? Sorry, just one last thing. Can we see some receipts here? It was briefly thrown out and moved on from with nowt but a passing wink. Can't even tell if they understood the word they used, a lot of people already don't.

It is, all in all, a lost cause. Like trying to think of all the different types of cancer your body may someday decide to gift you with.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
19,633
4,438
118
Just saw Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse a.k.a. enjoy that 5-year long cliffhanger.

It's really good, if not a tad too busy for its own good, but then the business never got overwhelming. I really liked the opening setting up Gwen's life, and how dreary it is, making her choice to just fucking leave totally valid. The Spot as a villain worked surprisingly well, going from a joke villain to a seemingly unstoppable nihilistic force of destruction.

The visuals are orgasmic and I'm glad the whole multi-verse angle is used to throw some crazy looking shit at you. Not as keen on their attempts to plaster easter eggs and big fat references though. Got a little too live-action for my taste.

Expected a bit more from Miguel o' Hara and Jessica Drew. They look super cool, but were ultimately just a couple of stick-in-the-mud's. And it really drags out the cliffhanger ending. We spend a good 15 minutes waiting for that 'to be continued' to finally drop. Still a neat twist though.

Also, Aunt May moved to Florida?! Might as well have pushed her out to sea Miles.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
18,526
3,045
118
Just saw Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse a.k.a. enjoy that 5-year long cliffhanger.

It's really good, if not a tad too busy for its own good, but then the business never got overwhelming. I really liked the opening setting up Gwen's life, and how dreary it is, making her choice to just fucking leave totally valid. The Spot as a villain worked surprisingly well, going from a joke villain to a seemingly unstoppable nihilistic force of destruction.

The visuals are orgasmic and I'm glad the whole multi-verse angle is used to throw some crazy looking shit at you. Not as keen on their attempts to plaster easter eggs and big fat references though. Got a little too live-action for my taste.

Expected a bit more from Miguel o' Hara and Jessica Drew. They look super cool, but were ultimately just a couple of stick-in-the-mud's. And it really drags out the cliffhanger ending. We spend a good 15 minutes waiting for that 'to be continued' to finally drop. Still a neat twist though.

Also, Aunt May moved to Florida?! Might as well have pushed her out to sea Miles.
I thought O'Hara was used adequately, given what his role in the plot turns into. Drew was a big ole nothing after a cool entrance.

As much as I think To Be Continueds are a vile thing to do in movies, they kinda pulled it off here. And having *those* scenes there before ending it is much better than having Miles simply arrive *there* and cut to credits, Ash Williams style. But yeah, my gut reaction was to feel ripped off. I did not know this was half a movie.

Next one is due 2024 if they keep up with their own schedule. It's Sony, not a Kickstarter.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
19,633
4,438
118
I thought O'Hara was used adequately, given what his role in the plot turns into. Drew was a big ole nothing after a cool entrance.
Considering how both of them were featured in the marketing I expected a bit more from them. I mean, you got a pregnant Spider-Woman riding a motorcycle - that's exactly the kind of silly superhero shit I want to see, and she barely does anything.

As much as I think To Be Continueds are a vile thing to do in movies, they kinda pulled it off here. And having *those* scenes there before ending it is much better than having Miles simply arrive *there* and cut to credits, Ash Williams style. But yeah, my gut reaction was to feel ripped off. I did not know this was half a movie.
It worked well enough in that it didn't sour my experience and it made me want to see the next one, but the manner in which it was just peaking around the corner after a certain point just became a bit hard for me not to focus on.

Next one is due 2024 if they keep up with their own schedule. It's Sony, not a Kickstarter.
It is? I mean, I figured Into came out in '18, so the third one would take as much time. But if true, than good.

Also, Peter B. Parker served no real purpose whatsoever, and his entire presence could've been kept to the final scene in the movie.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
18,526
3,045
118
Considering how both of them were featured in the marketing I expected a bit more from them. I mean, you got a pregnant Spider-Woman riding a motorcycle - that's exactly the kind of silly superhero shit I want to see, and she barely does anything.
I didn't really get much marketing for the movie. Didn't even know she was pregnant until she appeared. I just took it as one of those "women can kick ass no matter the circumstance" moments Hollywood likes. Like Bryce outrunning dinosaurs in high heels. She's there to be cool and be told (by Gwen) she's cool.

Also, Peter B. Parker served no real purpose whatsoever, and his entire presence could've been kept to the final scene in the movie.
He was there to mask the incoming betrayal (and make it more poignant to Miles/the viewers). It's true he's underused but I thought the same thing of the filler characters in the first movie (noir, pig, loli).
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
19,633
4,438
118
I didn't really get much marketing for the movie. Didn't even know she was pregnant until she appeared. I just took it as one of those "women can kick ass no matter the circumstance" moments Hollywood likes. Like Bryce outrunning dinosaurs in high heels. She's there to be cool and be told (by Gwen) she's cool.

He was there to mask the incoming betrayal (and make it more poignant to Miles/the viewers). It's true he's underused but I thought the same thing of the filler characters in the first movie (noir, pig, loli).
With the way Miguel was from his very first scene it was clear though he would represent some obstacle for Miles, and the movie revealing Gwen to have lied to Miles before he even got to meet Miguel set a future betrayal in stone.

They should've given Jessica Drew Peter B. Parker's scenes (minus the final one obviously). She could've been the "good cop" to Miguel's "bad cop". As for her being pregnant being used as a 'girl power' moment... I suppose, but to me it felt like another way of showing how ludicrously casual these Spider-people interact with normally impossible situations, like Peter B. calmly walking up a wall in Into the Spider-Verse, or Miles and Gwen sitting upside down on the underside of a building like gravity has no effect on them. Likewise Jessica Drew is pregnant yet here she is doing backflips on a motorcycle, because she's a Spider-person so duh. I actually wish she had more scenes that played into this.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
18,526
3,045
118
With the way Miguel was from his very first scene it was clear though he would represent some obstacle for Miles, and the movie revealing Gwen to have lied to Miles before he even got to meet Miguel set a future betrayal in stone.

They should've given Jessica Drew Peter B. Parker's scenes (minus the final one obviously). She could've been the "good cop" to Miguel's "bad cop". As for her being pregnant being used as a 'girl power' moment... I suppose, but to me it felt like another way of showing how ludicrously casual these Spider-people interact with normally impossible situations, like Peter B. calmly walking up a wall in Into the Spider-Verse, or Miles and Gwen sitting upside down on the underside of a building like gravity has no effect on them. Likewise Jessica Drew is pregnant yet here she is doing backflips on a motorcycle, because she's a Spider-person so duh. I actually wish she had more scenes that played into this.
Actually now that you pair the two Peter B is basically the male answer to Drew. Both are literally burdened with kids, both are used for their nonconforming gender roles: pregnant women can be action heroes, and male action heroes can be garbed in pink and saddled with babies.

I don't wanna lose black preggo biker lady but by that same token you could give her role to Peter B. We know and like him from the first movie so he falls naturally into a good cop bad cop dynamic with the new intense O'Hara, gives Peter something to do, gives him much more of an arc since the first movie and makes the sting later feel even more painful and unpredictable.

For all Drew does in the movie she might as well just be the muscle in a couple of action scenes.
 

Bob_McMillan

Elite Member
Aug 28, 2014
5,196
1,871
118
Country
Philippines
It is? I mean, I figured Into came out in '18, so the third one would take as much time. But if true, than good.
My recollection is hazy, but I think the idea was Across was going to labelled Part 1 straight up. Then it got delayed significantly, perhaps during COVID? So I guess they took the extra time to cram even more stuff into this movie, and as a consolation for the cliffhanger, the next movie is coming March 29, 2024. Which is not even a full year of waiting. Honestly shocked that Sony had the restraint to delay it this much, but then they don't have their own streaming service.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
6,106
5,398
118
Australia
The Boondock Saints - 9/10

For clarity, the movie is actually pretty rubbish by most objective measures. It looks cheap, its director is a fucking egotistical wanker and the movie also plants its flag in some places that when it was made (early 2000s) were just edgy but nowadays are probably just straight up uncomfortable for a lot of people. Willem Dafoe's weirdly homophobic but very openly gay Agent Smecker is.....going to need someone better than I to unpack as a character. And then toss in law enforcement actively conspiring with a pair of vigilante murderers to cover up their crimes. I mean you're not sorry about who they kill, but, its still pretty off tap.

That said, Norman Reedus and Sean Patrick Flannery are very charming, irreverent and cool in a natural way as brothers Murphy and Connor. Willem Dafoe is, well Willem Dafoe: love it or hate it the mad bastard gives it his all and it shows. And David Della Rocco (who goes by his own name) is kind of hilarious in that unhinged dickhead kind of way, and of course the stand out is Billy Connelly.

Look if you can tolerate some early 2000s edgelord humour, its actually still a pretty neat little movie that could. Most of it coasts on the natural charisma of the two brothers, while Willem Dafoe presumably used it as an excuse to give everyone else acting lessons in the same way Basil Fawlty teaches people how to run hotels: watch what I do, and do the opposite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
19,633
4,438
118
Actually now that you pair the two Peter B is basically the male answer to Drew. Both are literally burdened with kids, both are used for their nonconforming gender roles: pregnant women can be action heroes, and male action heroes can be garbed in pink and saddled with babies.

I don't wanna lose black preggo biker lady but by that same token you could give her role to Peter B. We know and like him from the first movie so he falls naturally into a good cop bad cop dynamic with the new intense O'Hara, gives Peter something to do, gives him much more of an arc since the first movie and makes the sting later feel even more painful and unpredictable.

For all Drew does in the movie she might as well just be the muscle in a couple of action scenes.
Sure, but Peter B. already got his arc in the first movie. He was the reluctant mentor who could stand to learn a bit himself, and then he did. His character was pretty much done. In Across he's just kinda there - in every scene he's in it feels like he's just taking his kid for a stroll and he could just as easily leave if he felt like it - while Miguel and Drew are the old guard who've become a bit too blinded by their own regulations. That could've been their arc, or maybe it's still going to be with third movie on the way, but for a character that got a hefty stage early on to been shown off she just disappears to the background.

And I actually quite liked how they introduced the side Spider-people in Across in comparison to Into, by giving them the first 15 minutes or so of the movie before introducing Miles. But for Jessica Drew this ends up feeling a bit wasted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
19,633
4,438
118
Oh, and I also watched Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves.

It was alright, I didn't hate my time with it. It had decent comedic energy, but the moments it tries to be sincere don't land well. Chris Pine's character and his daughter also had the chemistry of wallpaper. It was neat seeing the cartoon gang in the background in the maze sequence, but eh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Dungeons and Dragons (2000) (5/10)

I'm going to just bite the bullet and come out and say it - I don't think this is a bad movie.

By now means is it a "good" movie either, and of course, I went into this expecting it to be the Antichrist of movies, and was let down when it wasn't Satanspawn, and similarly, it's in a genre I'm more partial to than others. That being said, at the end of the day, this film is fantasy schlock. And schlock isn't good, but as a low budget, cheesy fantasy flick, you could do a lot worse (though in the case of Honour Among Thieves, a lot better as well).

Now, I could leave it there, but I figure hey, why not, let's actually dissect this schlock:

PLOT
The plot is silly at best, and broken at worst.

So, we have an evil empire that doesn't actually seem to be that evil (more on that later), where the empress controls a rod that allows her to control gold dragons. She's also woke, and wants to make everyone equal. Not wanting fantasy communism, the Mage Council wants her to give up her McGuffin, so she wants a red rod (Rod of Savrille? Christ, did I remember that?) to allow her to control red dragons, and in doing so, alerts the antagonist to the existence of the red rod. The irony is that if the empress didn't do anything (as we'll see later), none of the issues in the film would have happened. The red rod only becomes a mcGuffin because the empress makes it one. And while that can certanly work in fiction (see Ocarina of Time - Zelda wants to stop Ganondorf from getting the Triforce, and in doing so, allows him to get it), but to quote a wise philosopher, "this ain't it, chief."

Now, I could go step-by-step in the plot, but I don't really have the inclination to, but it's noticeable that there's certain things that aren't really addressed. For instance, the protagonist's sword is magic, or at least, there's a magic effect that occurs everytime he uses it. Either he got a magic sword at some point, or it was magic all along, and it's never explained or even referenced why there's the light show. Another instance, there's an elf and dwarf character who won't follow the human members of their party into a council because "these places [human castles?] weren't meant for us." Okay, first, what does that mean, second, how does that stop you from entering them, third, while dwarf guy is useless, elf girl is a skilled tracker, and should be able to infiltrate said castle, but nup, the protagonists have to do this alone because...I dunno, character development?

Things get more stupid towards the end, when the elf elder tells the protagonist that (paraphrased) getting the red rod will bring destruction and doom, and what have you, yet a few scenes later, they...enter the cave to get the red rod. No reflection, no addressment of the "don't get the red rod, idiot" warning earlier. True, there's a mural inside the McGuffin cave that shows red dragons destroying everything, and if anything, that's a more effective means of exposition than Tom Baker being an elf, but meh. Meanwhile, back in the empire, the empress refuses to relinquish her golden rod, starting a civil war, and one that she's winning easily with gold dragons. The antagonists only start to fight back when they get the red rod handed to them...a rod that they wouldn't have even known about if not for the empress searching for it in the first place. Again, there's potential for something there, but it's never addressed.

Anyway, good guys win, Jeremy Irons gets eaten, cue lightshow at end, the end. Bleh. If this was solely judged on the basis of plot, it would easily be in "bad" territory.
CHARACTERS
Chances are that if you've seen any review of this film on YouTube (I'd recommend Nostalgia Critic's) you've got a good idea of how these characters work, and not for the better. Certainly I had my impressions going in. Having now watched it, I can say that most characters aren't as bad as portrayed, while others are worse. So on that note:

-Protheon: Jeremy Irons is easily the best actor in the film, it's just that about 70% of the time, he doesn't get to show it. Our baddie spends a lot of time chewing the scenery, and while there might be some goofiness to be had from that, to me, it's more irritating than "OMG, lols." There's something to be said for an over the top villain, but the problem here is that when Irons ISN'T chewing the scenery, his acting's actually quite good. Theatrical when it needs to be, somber when it has to be. Not that his character is particuarly interesting, but as a performance, Irons is easily the best of the bunch.

-Empress: Yes, she has a name, no, I don't care enough to look up what it is. Her acting is terrible - it isn't just that her delivery is banal, it's like she's struggling to remember her lines, and stumbling through them as a result. Also, as a character, the empress is just bland. Her goal is that "everyone should be equal" in the empire, but that's a goal that's so vague and broad, and we see little actual oppression (more on that later), that she's just bleh.

-Ridley Freeborn: Ridley is the main protagonist, and a thief (even though he seems more like a rogue/warrior hybrid, but whatever). While writing this, I wondered if I should comprae him (or the others) to the party in Honour Among Thieves. Having decided "maybe," I'll say that Ridley's de facto counterpart is Edgin, but Edgin is just better, from his backstory to his motivations. Ridley doesn't really have a backstory, and his motivations are never really defined. He hates mages, but there's no real denouement in this context, certainly not anything that carries real weight. He starts off just wanting to get rich, but decides fairly early on that he has to help the empress, through character interactions that take place offscreen. Yep, you read that right, the protag's change of course comes from character interactions that are never actually shown to the viewer. Even with that, Ridley would be "okay" as a protagonist, except the movie pushes some stupid chosen one nonsense, where greater powers are hinted at (see the ending) that are never really explained, nor are they really ever that relevant, except as a crutch for certain elements (e.g. Ridley's the only one that can enter the McGuffin cave because he's "the special").

-Snails: I'm going to say something that will probably surprise a lot of people - I don't think Snails is that bad of a character. Not that he's a "good" character by any means, but his supposed role as comic relief has kind of been exagerated. It's there, but he's not THE comic relief, if you get my meaning. That said, I don't really have anything to say about Snails, and he primarily exists to serve Ridley's character arc (Snails is killed, protag is pissed, avenges him, you get how this goes). That's actually a trait of the group that HAT avoided - Ridley is the protag, everyone in the party is secondary to him in terms of plot importance, whereas in HOT, every member of the group had their own role to play.

-Marina Pretenza: Pretenza. Pretentious. Stops being pretentious. Aren't we clever? Meh, whatever - she's the party's mage, or would be, because there's only about two times in the entire film where she uses magic, despite having multiple scenarios where magic would help. Anyway, she's a member of aristocracy (mageocracy?) and starts off by looking down on commoners (e.g. Ridley), but over time (or not much time) grows to respect him. Sort of. Maybe. Kind of. Yeah, Marina is set up as having a character arc that I'm sure you'd recognize, but it doesn't really develop in a meaningful way. There's lip service to the above ideas, but little of it means anything, and she and Ridley have the 'true wuv' development that's about as banal as you might think.

-Dwarf Guy: Yes, he has a name. No, this name is never, EVER, mentioned in the film itself (unless I missed something). Remember how I said Snails wasn't the comic relief? Well, the reason is that dwarf guy is. He's so useless that even the protags call him "the dwarf" in a scene. He never actually does anything, or if he does, it's not something that another character could have done. He starts the movie off as a joke, and ends the movie as, well, not a joke, but not really anything. He dislikes elves (of course), and states how he's willing to show his feelings unlike other dwarfs (or something), but nothing of this comes around. Snails actually accomplishes something in the movie, Dwarf Guy doesn't. I know this is an unfair comparison, but think of Gimli in Lord of the Rings, then think of Dwarf Guy. One of these stunties is an actual character, one of them isn't.

-Norda: Elf tracker girl who's as dull as that description suggests. Doesn't help that it's implied that elves in this setting dislike humans, yet she's working for a human empress for reasons that are never explained or even questioned. She's at least not as bad as dwarf guy, in that she actually plays a role in the story (sort of) and is more or less competent, but apart from that, I've got nothing to say.

-Damadar: One of the few characters that I ended up liking more than I thought I would, compared to reviews and whatnot. On one hand, there's nothing interesting about him as a character, and there's some truly hammy lams and acting. On the other, as the bad guy's muscle, he does a decent job of playing the part, of being a threat that the protagonists struggle to overcome. There's also the whole demon in his head thing, and as the movie goes on, you can see how he's physically deteriorarintg. It becomes irrelevant by the end, but he's okay as your standard villain thug.
WORLDBUILDING
The worldbuilding of this film isn't great. There's little sense of place, and what information we have isn't appropriately handled. For instance, the opening lines of the film tell us that the empire is ruled by mages, while everyone else lives in near-slavery. However, based on what we see, there's no real evidence that the people are particuarly downtrodden, nor is there any scene where we see a mage abusing their power. There's talk of the empress's ideas stirring revolution, but again, we don't see any signs of this. The battle at the end, for instance, is done entirely through dragons and magic, with none of the regular people in-between.

CONCLUSION

So, yeah, the film ain't great. Still, I don't think it's "bad" - it doesn't really enter that territory. I can't really recommend it to anyone, whether you're a fan of the genre or not, but you could do a lot worse.
 

McElroy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2013
4,582
376
88
Finland
I just took it as one of those "women can kick ass no matter the circumstance" moments Hollywood likes.
A pregnant African-American Spider-Woman from an alternate universe who is a member of the Spider-Society and rides a motorcycle. Unlike most Spider-People, Drew does not maintain a secret identity.
Looks like they are reaching for a pretty specific power fantasy also known as a diversity consultants wet dream. Even in comics the description above would get your family and friends in harms way or worse. Truly the strangest timeline.
 

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
26,976
11,303
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
Truly the strangest timeline
The best.

Across the Spider-Verse - Best Movie of The Year! Everything aligned perfectly and nothing was wasted! The blending of a 1000 animation styles, the soundtrack, the even better scoped and expanded action, and character interactions and development! Everyone keeps nailing it! The in-jokes are even better and not distracting and actually add little touches to the movie.


The Boondock Saints - 9/10

For clarity, the movie is actually pretty rubbish by most objective measures. It looks cheap, its director is a fucking egotistical wanker and the movie also plants its flag in some places that when it was made (early 2000s) were just edgy but nowadays are probably just straight up uncomfortable for a lot of people. Willem Dafoe's weirdly homophobic but very openly gay Agent Smecker is.....going to need someone better than I to unpack as a character. And then toss in law enforcement actively conspiring with a pair of vigilante murderers to cover up their crimes. I mean you're not sorry about who they kill, but, its still pretty off tap.

That said, Norman Reedus and Sean Patrick Flannery are very charming, irreverent and cool in a natural way as brothers Murphy and Connor. Willem Dafoe is, well Willem Dafoe: love it or hate it the mad bastard gives it his all and it shows. And David Della Rocco (who goes by his own name) is kind of hilarious in that unhinged dickhead kind of way, and of course the stand out is Billy Connelly.

Look if you can tolerate some early 2000s edgelord humour, its actually still a pretty neat little movie that could. Most of it coasts on the natural charisma of the two brothers, while Willem Dafoe presumably used it as an excuse to give everyone else acting lessons in the same way Basil Fawlty teaches people how to run hotels: watch what I do, and do the opposite.
I have both the original and sequel. The first movie is fine, but it's full of the vigilante wish fulfillment shit that I got tired years ago. The sequel was meh, and never felt the need to see it again.
 
Last edited:

PsychedelicDiamond

Wild at Heart and weird on top
Legacy
Jan 30, 2011
1,934
764
118
Man, I'm actually excited for Spiderverse. I regret not getting to see the first one at the theatre, won't make the same mistake with the new one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

laggyteabag

Scrolling through forums, instead of playing games
Legacy
Oct 25, 2009
3,301
982
118
UK
Gender
He/Him
Watched a bit of a Superhero movie trifecta over the last couple of days.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3: A satisfying conclusion to what is probably the MCU's best trilogy of movies. Definitely one of their better projects lately (though that isn't a particularly high bar). Im curious to see what characters will return in the future, but this was a good send off to those who don't. I'll miss James Gunn's input on the MCU, because they really need it, right now. Curious to see where he takes the new DCEU though.

Ant-Man and the Wasp Quantumania: I thought the other two Ant-Man movies were decent enough for what they were, and I went in to this one trying to be optimistic, despite the reception.

I was wrong to be. This was the wrong movie for Ant-Man, and a poor introduction to Kang as a villain.

Ant-Man is a goofy hero, who does quirky little heist shenanigans. He shouldn't really be interacting with aliens (or equivalents) in his solo movies, and this film was just really jarring because of it.

It is also really interesting that MCU properties over the last few years have been consistently panned for their poor CGI, and then this movie comes along and doubles down on it all. A lot of this movie looked like it was ripped straight out of Spy Kids, and it was just generally pretty horrible to look at.

I also just realised during the course of this movie that I don't really care for this franchise's supporting cast; they are probably the least memorable in the whole MCU. Any/all of them could die, and I wouldn't really care, remember, or notice. Michael Peña's Luis was the only one that I quite liked, because of his whole storytelling gimmick, and he wasn't even in this one! Michelle Pfeiffer and Michael Douglas seemed to really phone it in, here.

As for Kang, in theory he could be a really interesting villain, but I don't think this film set him up well at all. His whole backstory was very much him just telling us how cool and powerful he was, but not actually showing us. He says he has killed a billion different versions of the Avengers in the past/different universes, so show us. Doctor Strange 2 did this, and it was really effective. As it stands, all we have to go on so far is that the next big-bad of the MCU talks big game, but lost to Ant-Man on his first go. Not exactly doing a great job of setting up the next Thanos.

Definitely a bottom-tier MCU movie, and I once again am left wondering what we could have had, if Edgar Wright did end up directing Ant-Man after all.

Spider-Man Across the Spider-Verse: Generally incredible, and pretty much perfect. Sure, it a Part 1 of 2, and so falls into a lot of the same trappings as every other film that is a Part 1 of 2 out there, but you can tell that this film was made with pure passion, care and style from just about everyone that was involved with it. This is probably my favourite film of 2023 so far.

On a related note, I just think it is pretty bizarre that Sony can hit two-for-two on these Spider-Verse movies, but continue to shit out their live-action Spider-Man adjacent movies that have so far been consistently terrible. Not sure what is going on behind the scenes for this to happen, but im just sad that more films aren't made with the same care and love as these Spider-Verse movies are.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

laggyteabag

Scrolling through forums, instead of playing games
Legacy
Oct 25, 2009
3,301
982
118
UK
Gender
He/Him
Not as keen on their attempts to plaster easter eggs and big fat references though. Got a little too live-action for my taste.
Yeah, this was pretty weird.

I had always subconsciously assumed that these films were animated because of an artistic choice, and through these character's eyes, they were equivalent to live-action people. But by clearly depicting animated characters next to live action ones, Roger Rabbit style, it raises some unfortunate meta questions that I would have preferred that the film not touched. Obviously, that is looking into this non-issue way too deep, but it does raise those questions regardless.

With that being said, Im not going to say that it wasn't cool to briefly see little clips of Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield, and I did like what they were doing with Donald Glover. I do think Sony were smelling their own farts a bit too much though, with the shop lady from Venom, because I'm not sure that anyone actually likes those films enough for this to have made a notable appearance.

Even so, this film very firmly stands on its own merits, instead of depending on your nostalgia, IMO like with Spider-Man: No Way Home, or The Mandalorian Season 2. These cameos are just cameos, which I think is a concept that has been mostly lost in this post-MCU world.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan