Bond never worked for me (until Casino Royale) specifically becuase he was a walking stereotype. I think explaining him in Casino Royale was the best thing they did for him. Pity they haven't done much with that.Catnip1024 said:Serious? I found Finn the most poorly written and unrelatable character in the movie. Rey wasn't the highest quality of writing, but didn't have any of the jarring "why the fuck would they do that?" moments. Likewise, I was kind of appreciating the engineer character from the latest one until she pulled that batshit crazy stunt at the end...trunkage said:While bad male characters aren't given that scrutiny.
The difference between Rey and Luke is generational - 70s movies tended not to have the same expectations on character development. He was a 2D stereotype character, but that was fine because the film was about the story not the people.
Anakin, for all the issues with the prequels and how they were written, was a deeply flawed individual. That's essentially the point of the prequel trilogy, him giving in to his base instincts. His flying skills were largely absurd, but so was a large number of things in the Phantom Menace.
And in a wider sense, I think we come back to the difference between movies about storylines and movies about people. James Bond is a walking stereotype, but that works because Bond films are about the story and not him as a person. There is (or should be) no attempt to explain him or develop him, because that's not the point. I think the more modern Star Wars films attempt to make people care more about the characters, and as a result open themselves to more scrutiny when said characters are poor.
You could be right about trying to develop characters you care about gets more scrutiny. The reverse happens to me when I try to discuss how archetypal and basic Luke and the gang are. They don't sound like they've spent anytime thinking about it.
Which meand that if you compare an old liked character to a new character, you're never going to know why you like the former over the latter. It's based on feelings and deliberately ignoring character traits.