Dishonored Designer Urges Developers to "Specialize"

Recommended Videos

Cognimancer

Imperial Intelligence
Jun 13, 2012
1,906
0
0
Dishonored Designer Urges Developers to "Specialize"



According to Harvey Smith, a game doesn't need to do everything - it just needs to do one thing very well.

Every once in a while a new trend emerges in the gaming mainstream. Publishers will naturally want to capitalize on this: when online multiplayer exploded in popularity, every game had to find a way to include a competitive multiplayer component. Lately publishers have been pushing to incorporate social media tie-ins, because evidently that's where the market is. Harvey Smith does not subscribe to this trend-chasing theory. He doesn't think that the expanding market is killing old-school sensibilities. And as co-creative director on Dishonored (an offline single-player stealth game that was awarded Best Game at the BAFTAs [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/122527-Dishonored-Wins-Best-Game-at-BAFTAs]), he should know.

As Smith sees it, the interests of the gaming masses aren't shifting, they're just growing. "What the reality seems to be is we keep adding types of games and finding new player groups for those," he says. "The market seems to be expanding." Smith admits that while some fans have complained about the lack of multiplayer in Dishonored, many more have expressed gratitude for the game's polished single-player experience.

The rising development costs of modern games are one of the biggest obstacles to innovation - trends can generally be milked reliably for a while, but new ideas don't have as much guaranteed return on the investment. Interestingly, Smith hopes that increased costs will actually force game studios to try new things, rather than cling to whatever the current craze is. "I hope people are specializing and going deeper on given mechanics," he explains. "And I actually hope it gets to the point where there are so many people competing - indie developers and commercial developers - and they're so good at this one thing they do that in order to win, you have to differentiate. You have to do something well that the other guy's not doing. That'd be nice, right? Instead of a handful of games that all try to do the same thing, I hope there's some specialization happening and people are going to have to do one thing well or three things well instead of trying to do the same 12 things everyone else is doing."

Smith and the rest of Arkane Studios are currently working on the next piece of Dishonored DLC, The Knife of Dunwall, which is due to launch on April 16.

Source: Games Industry International [http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2013-03-22-demise-of-single-player-games-overstated-says-dishonored-dev]

Permalink
 

R.Nevermore

New member
Mar 28, 2008
291
0
0
Agreed. Dishonored does what it does and it does it very damn well. As much as I'd love to put its sweet swordplay to test against other players, I can't complain.
 

Kuredan

Hingle McCringleberry
Dec 4, 2012
166
0
0
But, but, but every game should be all things to all people. What about my social multiplayer FPRPGS/city builder? Call of ZombievilleCraft Online (for Facebook)!
 

TorchofThanatos

New member
Dec 6, 2010
163
0
0
Well the only thing that that game did right was stealth combat. So, good job? Your story was terrible, had bad pacing and you took the Strider idea form HL2 and put it in your game. Had a good/evil system that was not ever explained and amounted to nothing. The game was still fun, I enjoyed playing it. Interesting idea though. Have a bunch of niche game industry's.
 

flarty

New member
Apr 26, 2012
632
0
0
Mcoffey said:
Considering all they did was make a poor-mans' Deus Ex in a steam punk setting, perhaps they're not the ones to speak up about differentiating, hmm?

Still, he's not wrong. It would be nice to see a few less grizzled white guys walking away from fire with a gun on the box art.
But but. Deus ex is a poor mans thief clone set in a cyberpunk setting???

In other words, they're not talking about inventing new genres, they are talking about choosing one and stick to doing it well instead of trying to pander to everyone.

TorchofThanatos said:
Well the only thing that that game did right was stealth combat. So, good job? Your story was terrible, had bad pacing and you took the Strider idea form HL2 and put it in your game. Had a good/evil system that was not ever explained and amounted to nothing. The game was still fun, I enjoyed playing it. Interesting idea though. Have a bunch of niche game industry's.
That would be because it was the same person who did all the concept art for hl2 who did dishonoureds. No love for the level design and visual style? :(
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
Mcoffey said:
Considering all they did was make a poor-mans' Deus Ex in a steam punk setting, perhaps they're not the ones to speak up about differentiating, hmm?

Still, he's not wrong. It would be nice to see a few less grizzled white guys walking away from fire with a gun on the box art.
I disagree.

It seemed more of a poor-man's Splinter Cell:Chaos theory. It had the right idea although the mechanics gave you god power.
 

octafish

New member
Apr 23, 2010
5,134
0
0
mad825 said:
Mcoffey said:
Considering all they did was make a poor-mans' Deus Ex in a steam punk setting, perhaps they're not the ones to speak up about differentiating, hmm?

Still, he's not wrong. It would be nice to see a few less grizzled white guys walking away from fire with a gun on the box art.
I disagree.

It seemed more of a poor-man's Splinter Cell:Chaos theory. It had the right idea although the mechanics gave you god power.
...and yet, what was one of the greatest things about Chaos Theory? The innovative and unsurpassed stealth multi-player...
 

grigjd3

New member
Mar 4, 2011
541
0
0
I basically agree with this. Trying to shove too many features into a game gets tiring and tends to simply waste money. I'm not fundamentally against MP or anything, but I do see that many games are trying to pack that stuff in without considering whether it's necessary or even if it adds at all to the total experience. I mean, I have yet to play a lockpicking minigame in an elder scrolls title that added anything more to the game than simply attacking the lock with a lockpick (as was done in Morrowind).
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
octafish said:
...and yet, what was one of the greatest things about Chaos Theory? The innovative and unsurpassed stealth multi-player...
So a game has to innovative to be a good game?...Well, how innovative is Dishonored? Alot of people enjoyed the Singleplayer as well, nothing great but still better than the crap we get today.

Mcoffey said:
Splinter cell had no RPG elements
Every thing but the numbers and inventory management, it had elements like Deus Ex however they were streamlined, in Dishonored they were streamlined even futher. The mortality system? Trolololo, Fable:TLC has a better mortality system and that's saying something.
 

flarty

New member
Apr 26, 2012
632
0
0
Mcoffey said:
I may be mistaken, I haven't little knowledge of the Thief games, but I saw more in common with Deus Ex due to the RPG elements and the (limited) branching narrative. Wasn't Thief more specifically stealth? In any event you're second point is correct.
You may be correct as i have only ever played about 20 minutes of thief 3. But since i play deus ex exclusively stealth it was the first game that popped into my head for comparison. My point with the comment was though is everyone has opinions. No need to spout em as fact.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,470
0
0
There are so many concepts in gaming that overlap, heavily specializing is kind of impossible.
Still, I appreciate the plea for diversity; it's sorely lacking in mainstream gaming.
 

Saxnot

New member
Mar 1, 2010
212
0
0
I agree. For example, look at the crative assembly. They are very good at making total war games. every other game they try to make is mediocre at best, but the total war games are always very good. Total war is where their strength is, and that's where they should focus their energy.

Bioware is another example. they started off as hardcore RPG makers, but kept adding more shooter and removing rpg, and now they've lost their RPg fanbase, without gainig any great hold on the shooter market.

obviously, you shouldn't stagnate or only make a single game over and over, but there's a lot to be said for laying your focus on the kind of games you're best at.
 

geizr

New member
Oct 9, 2008
850
0
0
Games don't have to do one thing well. They just need to focus on doing only those things most appropriate to the game's concept.

EDIT: emphasis added.
 

Chester Rabbit

New member
Dec 7, 2011
1,004
0
0
You guys up there do know the reason Dishonored borrows from Deus Ex right?
I mean it's likely you know but the way you are all talking it sounds like you haven't a clue

And I?m pretty sure all he is saying here is what everyone has been saying for the last two years now. Stop trying to appeal to everyone by putting a little bit of every genre into your game and just decide on a demographics and stick to your niche.
 

gphjr14

New member
Aug 20, 2010
868
0
0
I really do get annoyed when people say games like Dishonored need multiplayer. What you end up with is the same capture and hold, capture the flag, and death match that everyone's seen for the past 10+ years in gaming. I don't mind open world games like GTA having an online free roam, I'd would've loved for Far Cry 3 to have that instead of a glitchy co-op.
 

Busard

New member
Nov 17, 2009
168
0
0
Devoneaux said:
Nice sentiment but I disagree, Bioware's slavishly sticking to a single formulue every single time is arguably part of what's killing the company. The problem is not that dev teams aren't specialized, the problem is that every game is made to appeal to everyone. As opposed to making multiple games that each appeal to different markets.
It's not that they're sticking to the same thing that is killing them. It's because they're fucking awful at it.
 

T3hSource

New member
Mar 5, 2012
320
0
0
Eh, another tip I'd give is to actually be passionate and invested into your project for years to come, because if you aren't, Dishonored is what you get. Plays perfectly, but everything seems off, it's just purely mechanical with no real soul or vision behind it.
 

Braedan

New member
Sep 14, 2010
697
0
0
I took this to mean the developers should sspecialize their GAME, not specialize their company into making only one type of game.

He meant don't make the (individual) game try and be all genres.

A lot of you seem to think he meant keep making the same game over and over again.
 

octafish

New member
Apr 23, 2010
5,134
0
0
mad825 said:
octafish said:
...and yet, what was one of the greatest things about Chaos Theory? The innovative and unsurpassed stealth multi-player...
So a game has to innovative to be a good game?...Well, how innovative is Dishonored? Alot of people enjoyed the Singleplayer as well, nothing great but still better than the crap we get today.
You seem to think I am attacking Splinter Cell. I am not, well not unless we are talking about the games after Chaos Theory. Just saying that sometimes multiplayer brings something more to a game. Chaos Theory is the game that turned me onto the idea that not all multi-player was just boring deathmatches. I wasn't that impressed with Dishonour to be honest, but then again I got it the same day I got the new X-Com. It never had a chance.
 

grey_space

Magnetic Mutant
Apr 16, 2012
455
0
0
T3hSource said:
Eh, another tip I'd give is to actually be passionate and invested into your project for years to come, because if you aren't, Dishonored is what you get. Plays perfectly, but everything seems off, it's just purely mechanical with no real soul or vision behind it.
That's an interesting way to go about describing the games flaws. Soulless and lacking in passion?

I disagree I think that there was plenty of passion in the development of the game.If anything, possibly too much in one direction.

If they just chilled the beans a little and perhaps allowed a few beats/levels for character development rather than rushing the player off to the next cool piece of their world that they wanted to show off.

I think they were a little too much in love with the the world they created, and maybe not enough with their characters.


I would totally agree with you that while it was an excellent game, it could have been so much more.