Personally:
1. I don't really like any XB1 exclusives.
2. PS4 is more likely to possess the kinds of games I like.
3. I'm cheap, so I haven't even gotten a PS4, so no thanks for XB1
I think the biggest point is its beginning phase. The stuff Microsoft tried to pull in its initial release was so bad, if I hadn't been following it myself, I would have probably ignored the first person who tried to tell me, as it was clearly either a joke or an exaggeration. No company could be so profoundly stupid with their marketing, the naive thought went through my brain. But they did. And even when backpeddled on things they pinky swore couldn't be taken out, it's more than just spite that's keeping people from buying. There's a lack of trust, which I think is probably not realistic (MS would be utterly suicidal to try and slip the control back in later, after the controversy showed them people were paying attention). It's the fact that Microsoft's actions must have a serious consequence on their bottom line to prevent it from happening again. If MS took out all the features and people bought them then, it sends the message that they couldn't get away with it then, but maybe later. They loose nothing for trying, after all, as next time they can just take things out of if too many people complain. Having a lasting impact with lower sales is much more likely to get and keep their attention.
1. I don't really like any XB1 exclusives.
2. PS4 is more likely to possess the kinds of games I like.
3. I'm cheap, so I haven't even gotten a PS4, so no thanks for XB1
I think the biggest point is its beginning phase. The stuff Microsoft tried to pull in its initial release was so bad, if I hadn't been following it myself, I would have probably ignored the first person who tried to tell me, as it was clearly either a joke or an exaggeration. No company could be so profoundly stupid with their marketing, the naive thought went through my brain. But they did. And even when backpeddled on things they pinky swore couldn't be taken out, it's more than just spite that's keeping people from buying. There's a lack of trust, which I think is probably not realistic (MS would be utterly suicidal to try and slip the control back in later, after the controversy showed them people were paying attention). It's the fact that Microsoft's actions must have a serious consequence on their bottom line to prevent it from happening again. If MS took out all the features and people bought them then, it sends the message that they couldn't get away with it then, but maybe later. They loose nothing for trying, after all, as next time they can just take things out of if too many people complain. Having a lasting impact with lower sales is much more likely to get and keep their attention.