do we need a sequel to avatar

Recommended Videos

AlchemistMayCry

New member
Nov 20, 2009
113
0
0
No need for an Avatar sequel. Though it did make bazillions, so Cameron's gonna continue. Just make two sequels and end it there. Max out the tech, make the story less Ferngully/Pocahontas/Dances with Wolves, and end it on some form of high note, like Jake sacrificing himself to become the new god of the Na'vi or something.
 

Kiju

New member
Apr 20, 2009
832
0
0
The only sequel I can think of for that story would be them finding a new home...somewhere...

Otherwise...no, leave it as is.
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,467
0
0
If it's like the first one then why not. If it fails then I won't watch it, if it's good then why not? I think I already thought of where they could go with the story...
The company goes back to earth and tells them what happend. The entire earth military then gets sent to take out the na'vi and get the unobtanium.
So it really isn't hard to think of where it could go next. I just hope it's a good movie...
 

Soushi

New member
Jun 24, 2009
895
0
0
From what i heard, when James Cameron originally wrote Avatar 14 years ago, he wrote it as a trilogy. SO, with any luck, he already has teh sequels planned.

Either way though, there is nothing we can do. All we can do is hope that the sequel will be just as good, or better, than the First one.

I have said it before, Avatar may just be the Star Wars of our Generation
 

IamQ

New member
Mar 29, 2009
5,223
0
0
twaddle said:
iamq said:
Frequen-Z said:
Why would that be?


Since Jake became a Nav'i at the end of the movie, it obviusly means it will take place on Pandora. The only reason that Pocahontas took place with the British, is because in the first movie, the blond dude that she loves (Forgot his name) got shot, and had to go back, and Disney doesn't want to have to create a new Love interest, so they choose for Pochahontas to follow him in the sequel.
sadly you are wrong a bit there. disney did make a new love interest. his name was john locke i believe and although Pocahontas movies wern't what you would call "historically accurate", they did follow the history of Pocahontas well enough because they did not make a third movie because in history Pocahontas died on the way back to from Britain to her home of smallpox or measles. She died on the boat anyway on the way home.... I read alot and i paid attention in american history class....and my sister rented the 2nd movie when we were kids, Sue me!
Oh, well you got me there then. In my defense though, I'm swedish and haven't had alot of classes about the american history.
 

MattRooney06

New member
Apr 15, 2009
737
0
0
chrisdibs said:
james cameron does good sequels, just look at aliens and terminator 2. We don't need it, but it'll probably be good.
but both alien and terminator set themselfs up for a sequel

Avatar ended with a the Na'vi lived happily after ever caring after each other and their planet

they sent the humans home and set the big bird thing free.....the only thing i could think could happen is the humans come back for the unobtainium
 

Blood Masque

New member
Jan 16, 2010
91
0
0
Mr.Wiggles said:
Smurfs and Pocahontas don't have decent sequels therefore, neither should Avatar!
Agreed. The Pocahontas sequel was completely lame.

OT: I haven't seen the movie yet, but most movies sequels are either a) better than the original or b) incredibly worse. It's a fifty fifty gamble, and honestly I hate sequels. They usually lead to another installment and milking of a franchise that needs to just fade away gracefully instead of beat for every dime that can be milked out of it.