The statistical arguments such as drakes equation make some pretty large assumptions that cannot be guaranteed. I know, I read it in a magazine albeit a since one.
Most grievously they assume that the wider universe looks like our solar system which if life is atypical would be untrue, also astronomy has not held to be true. Since we have a backtracking and guesswork based idea of how solar systems formed, even our own let alone others that we haven't seen, we simply don't know enough to say our models can be trusted.
Also if you say statistics make things certain you are misinformed.
Anyway, assuming the wider universe looks like our solar system which it probably doesn't, then simple life probably does abound, just very very far away and we have no clue about complex life, or even if our labels would fit whatever could be out there.
Most grievously they assume that the wider universe looks like our solar system which if life is atypical would be untrue, also astronomy has not held to be true. Since we have a backtracking and guesswork based idea of how solar systems formed, even our own let alone others that we haven't seen, we simply don't know enough to say our models can be trusted.
Also if you say statistics make things certain you are misinformed.
Anyway, assuming the wider universe looks like our solar system which it probably doesn't, then simple life probably does abound, just very very far away and we have no clue about complex life, or even if our labels would fit whatever could be out there.