JUMBO PALACE said:
I think it's a symbol of a past time where hatred was rampant, and this can be misconstrued as offensive. It's part of America's history, it's not a racial slur.
No more, if not less then the sixties and seventies when African Americans have freedom. What a lot of people don't know is slaves were often treated better then most free people of the time. Not every white southerner owned a plantation. In fact there is a term called 'indentured servant' where a man had to work in often horrible conditions to pay off his debts, couldn't leave his place of work, and could be arrested or worse happen to them, and unlike slaves they weren't required to be feed or given adequate medical care and housing.
[/quote]Hate. What pride is there in losing a war over an evil cause?[/quote]
What about pride in losing a war where invaders attacked and burned, raped and pillaged without mercy killing whites and blacks alike? What about pride in fighting to keep someone from taxing you, and destroying your way of life in a chokehold of forced industrilization?
Blindrooster said:
Why does everyone think the civil war was just about slavery? Abraham Lincoln didn't declare that they were fighting against slavery until well into the war. In fact, he said that the south could keep their slaves should they rejoin the union.
The civil war was not "PRO vs ANTI slavery" it was about the unfair treatment of the federal and state courts in the south. They were not given a voice in government. This, prohabition, and the election of Abraham Lincoln (Who was a great president, but the south practically had ZERO say in his election.)Slavery was wrong, but the confederate flag is NOT a pro-slavery symbol! The south was treated unfairly, they rebelled. Slavery WAS an issue that helped fuel the tensions between the North and South but it was NOT the basis of the war.
That being said: Slavery is terrible. Rebelling against oppression is not. It's a double edged sword. It depends on the person flying the flag. Hell, Thor's symbol used to be a swatstika.
Even though I think Lincoln and Grant could both burn in hell for all I care, your absolutly right on with your post. In fact Lincoln's own wife owned slaves and kept them until AFTER the war was over. Not to mention the North practiced slavery as well, they just cleverly worded the terms differently. After all at least southerners had to buy slaves. The north just took people off the boats and shoved them into industrial slums or 'drafted' them into the army to fight in the war without thier say or prior knowing. In addition to that when blacks served in the Union army, Union generals often thought of them as just bodies to absorb Confederate bullets, and nothing more. Thier role was to take the first volley's of fire so white troops didn't get hit as soon.
Deep Thought said:
Yes, it represents a nation that upheld several immoral values.......since I've been to the South, and there are some people who are quite kind, but I can't respect or express anything but contempt for the Confederacy, though I understand that their reasons for succession were more complicated than just slavery,
No more or less then the union. Take away slavery, and the values are family, life, and being able to own properity that couldn't be taken away without compensation. And while I'm sure there are some northerners that are nice, I have spent time in Philly and there wasn't a kind word or person to be found, it's just violence, and filth there. Dayton, Ohio where I spent time at the Air Force base with my service in Civil Air Patrol was pleasent though.