with the amount of people who don't know how to find anything it's not that surprising. even when a lot of people use google they don't know what to look for
You're probably right... ShitTalon_Kale said:Surely this is entirely dependant on "WHAT" you are useing google to look up
...just with more tentacle rape, lol catz and facials.Jon Etheridge said:It's pretty much like using a giant virtual library when you think about it. Except you don't have that nagging wench in the corner going "shhhh".
bjj hero said:...just with more tentacle rape, lol catz and facials.Jon Etheridge said:It's pretty much like using a giant virtual library when you think about it. Except you don't have that nagging wench in the corner going "shhhh".
His point still stands, and I tend to agree: users familiar with the tool exhibited more brain activity when presented with something they were trained in. If the other users had been given an activity that they were more familiar with, the tables may have been turned. This study primarily supports the thesis that "Internet users access more of their brain when using the internet than non-internet users do."CantFaketheFunk said:From what I understand, this wasn't as if they were being judged on how quickly they could find things. It's that MRI scans showed simply higher brain activity in complex thinking cores.S.H.A.R.P. said:Doesn't it indicate that you have trained certain parts of your brain by having used the internet a lot already? I bet that if there was a similar test executed with paper encyclopaedia's, where the no-internet-group were very proficient with them, while the pro-internet-group never used them, then suddenly the paper encyclopaedia readers were the smarter ones. Perhaps not in the same ways though.
I already have mine. [Go Away]BolognaBaloney said:This is great, I finally have a great excuse to use when my parents barge in at three in the morning.
"But mom, I'm learning!"
[Go away] never seems to work for me. I normally end up telling her I'm asleep (while she stares at me in front of my laptop) until she goes away.Mackinator said:I already have mine. [Go Away]BolognaBaloney said:This is great, I finally have a great excuse to use when my parents barge in at three in the morning.
"But mom, I'm learning!"
but, yeah this might cause less of an arguement.
Instead that nagging wench is porn, and she's whispering "credit cardssss"Jon Etheridge said:It's pretty much like using a giant virtual library when you think about it. Except you don't have that nagging wench in the corner going "shhhh".
Not that I'm going to disagree with your point that they're failing the correlation/causation dealy, but even what little you're allowing them [^quoted] is more than they've earned. They've demonstrated that people who use the internet have heightened brain activity when using the internet. If you want to define "smart" as "heightened brain activity when using the internet", then your above statement works, but otherwise, under any broader definition of "smart", they're a long way from showing even that correlation. Let alone, as you point out, any form of causation.HobbesMkii said:It demonstrates that those using the Internet constantly are smarter,...