I don't know... I mean it's got all the ingredients of a good game but I just didn't get as into it as I did with KoTOR, Mass Effect, Fallout 3, oblivion or even torchlight.JeanLuc761 said:
I'm pretty sure there are 4 or 5 Dragons in Origins and Awakening, and that's not including the Drakes and Dragonlings. Just saying...LordNue said:
DA is a much larger, more open game. Personally, I'm more than willing to see graphics sacrificed for the sake of content.Paragon Fury said:
I think the idea of the game was to be very generic. I mean otherwise they wouldn't have put humans, elves and dwarves in a world with dragons, right?Dexiro said:The name "Dragon Age Origins" did kind of insinuate that there was going to be a sequel
Hopefully with the 2nd one they take a few more risks. The areas and storyline for the first one were VERY generic.
It's a fantasy universe so anything could happen.DVSAurion said:I think the idea of the game was to be very generic. I mean otherwise they wouldn't have put humans, elves and dwarves in a world with dragons, right?Dexiro said:The name "Dragon Age Origins" did kind of insinuate that there was going to be a sequel
Hopefully with the 2nd one they take a few more risks. The areas and storyline for the first one were VERY generic.
I'm very interested of how they will continue the story. I mean after Awakening the story seemed pretty much over. And for the title to make any sense the game has to be set within a 100 years of the first one (Dragon age is the age they are living in the game, I think the game told that the age switched every 100 years).
Anoctris said:Sorry, didn't realise people have been bashing EA for this. I was bashing the OP.hazabaza1 said:Okay, I'll admit, I gathered that much, but still, everyone seems to just be bashing this. Why? Because it's from EA?Anoctris said:Because a week after initial release, after experiencing the game and reading others experiences, it seemed pretty obvious that there was either going to be copious amounts of DLC or a sequel.hazabaza1 said:Wow, I don't get why everyone is suddenly going 'herp derp, thank you captain obvious' andthis post in particular. It all seems a bit stupid to be honest, considering it's just one sequel, yet people buy the sequels that are churned out time and time again without complaint.Anoctris said:
This just in... a company attempting to capitalise on a recent success create a sequel! More at 11.
Personally, I'm looking forward to this. DA1 was a bit generic, yes, but generic does not mean bad.
This ain't rocket science. If a product does well they make more.
Whoop-de-fucking-doo. So long as it's a good day, who cares. Plus, the day 1 DLC plan means that you can see if you enjoy the general flow of DLC, so I don't get why people are bitching about that.
/fanboyrage
Ah, that's okay. I thought you were having a go at Bioware, and when someone has a go at Bioware with me around... there is blood.
Um you do realize that Bioware has three different studios right? And I think they are opening a 4th in Ireland. Also Drew if the main writer for the Mas effect series, while David Gainer is the main writer for the DA series. As far as I know anyway. I'm pretty sure Bioware Austin is doing TOR, and each of the Canada studios is working on DA and ME. So it really isn't much of an overload. Also even if all the writers are the same, they are only working during the beginning on the design process; before most of the work is even really done. Because of that they would have a lot of free time once the game itself goes into production.Undead Dragon King said:
I wonder if it will continue the game with previous characters or if we're going to have to start over again. i'd prefer the former, but by the end of Awakenings my warrior was so powerful that Bioware would have to create enemies / encounters so complicated it might make the game a bit ridiculous.RatRace123 said:
