Use-mention distinction quotation marks in this case, but of course someone as learned as yourself knew this and was just testing me.manythings said:Coming from someone who doesn't understand quotation marks aren't what you use for emphasis I'll manage to live. Legacy, the DA2 DLC, came out on the 26th and now DA2 is removed from the store. Want to act even dumber and call it coincidence?TheGuy(wantstobe) said:They do not get a cut of sales of DLC that do not go through the Steam store. DiRT 3 DLC is not sold in the Steam store so they do not get a cut. I would have thought the word "exclusive" would have tipped you off to this but you are even more challenged than the average internet denizen.manythings said:Umm... Yeah... really over-priced DLC that they get a cut of is clearly evidence they aren't cutting a publisher out of their service.TheGuy(wantstobe) said:And yet DiRT 3 as a very recent example sells it's DLC exclusively through Live and ingame and Valve has no problem with this. This is EA looking for an excuse to pull content and not seem like massive dicks and it's failing miserably.manythings said:The DLC thing says otherwise. Buy with Valve or fuck you is the message.ResonanceGames said:This is demonstrably false. Tons of games launch simultaneously on D2D, Onlive, Gamer's Gate and Steam.manythings said:Valve basically imposes a "We're the only ones to digitally sell this high profile product" clause. It's not a new concept.
I'm not calling the removal a coincidence as that would be rather foolish. What I am calling foul on is that it has only happened to EA and then only to their two most popular games on Steam that would be applicable in a change of TOS and not to the other games that have had DLC released exclusively ingame from other Publishers or even EA themselves with the Alice: Madness Returns DLC since said TOS changes took place.