EA Exec Says In-Game Advertising Doesn't Pay Off

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
EA Exec Says In-Game Advertising Doesn't Pay Off


Despite the once-high hopes, Electronic Arts executive Ben Cousens says in-game advertising hasn't paid off the way it was once expected to.

Remember a few years back when everyone thought that billboards and posters for real-life products in online games was the wave of the future and truckloads of money were being thrown at the companies that would make it happen? Google dropped $23 million on AdScape, Microsoft blew $200 million on Massive, publishers were signing deals as fast as they could and even Barack Obama got in on the act, becoming the first presidential candidate to ever buy ad space in a game.

But three years later, it's all become dust in the wind, dude. Cousens, the general manager of EA's free-to-play business, said the money just isn't there, at least not in the form envisioned back in the day. "We actually aren't getting much from ad revenue at all," he said in an interview with Edge [http://www.next-gen.biz/news/ea-in-game-ads-no-great-shakes]. "The in-game advertising business hasn't grown as fast as people expected it to."

What has grown is the microtransaction-powered market for virtual goods, which he said is a much more reliable source of revenue that EA has managed to tap into. "We hedged our bets," he continued. "We thought we'd do in-game advertising and virtual goods sales, and one of those took off really fast and the other hasn't really taken off at all."

Cousens clarified that he doesn't think in-game advertising is dead, but that it's not going to work out quite as envisioned in those heady days of 2007. "I think it's more about specific deals where you can tie the content in," he said. "We did a deal with Dr. Pepper [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/97308-Dr-Pepper-Giving-Away-Free-EA-DLC] for Battlefield Heroes, where if you buy a bottle and scan in the code you get an exclusive outfit," he said. "That kind of deep integration will work, I think, but I'm not convinced that we'll have billboards in games and things like that. Maybe those days are over."


Permalink
 

shaboinkin

New member
Apr 13, 2008
691
0
0
They need to realize, when someone is actively engaged in playing an intense match of [insert game here], there really isn't much to get them distracted. So putting an ad in the middle of a firefight isn't the smartest thing to do. They are too worried about not dying rather than worrying about New Coke, or whatever they were trying to advertise.

I remember playing Battlefield 2142 and I saw a billboard advertising an Intel Core 2 Duo...wait, it's 21..42. Not 2007.
It can kinda break immersion if you really get into a game.
 

Tom Phoenix

New member
Mar 28, 2009
1,161
0
0
rembrandtqeinstein said:
If I ever pay for a game and later find out it has advertising I will return it as defective.
Preety much. I am not willing to pay $60 for the privilege of being shoved advertisements down my throat. I already have to deal with that every time I watch television or go outside.

Anyway, this isn't anything suprising. I could have told Cousens that in-game advertising wasn't worth it three years ago. Customer is law and there is nothing beneficial for the customer when it comes to in-game advertising.
 

Phishfood

New member
Jul 21, 2009
743
0
0
shaboinkin said:
They need to realize, when someone is actively engaged in playing an intense match of [insert game here], there really isn't much to get them distracted. So putting an ad in the middle of a firefight isn't the smartest thing to do. They are too worried about not dying rather than worrying about New Coke, or whatever they were trying to advertise.

I remember playing Battlefield 2142 and I saw a billboard advertising an Intel Core 2 Duo...wait, it's 21..42. Not 2007.
It can kinda break immersion if you really get into a game.
Exactly. I remember being vaugely aware of those ads, but heres the thing...people who are playing online multiplayer fps probably already have a damn good processor and so the ad is wasted anyway. I don't object to billboards ingame being for rl things, but the targetting of the ads was so crap....and its so subliminal to have no effect.
 

-Samurai-

New member
Oct 8, 2009
2,294
0
0
Right. Which is why when I updated Madden 11 today, the first thing I noticed was the new TV advertisements. It doesn't pay off, yet EA keeps jamming it into their games.
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
Of course it's not effective. It is not disruptive to the player, it just exists as another easily ignorable asset in the game world.

Now if you replace the loading screens and such with adverts for a product, then you'll get consumer reaction.

Mostly hostility.
 

Evilsanta

New member
Apr 12, 2010
1,933
0
0
Games have in-game advertises? I never noticed...

shaboinkin said:
They need to realize, when someone is actively engaged in playing an intense match of [insert game here], there really isn't much to get them distracted. So putting an ad in the middle of a firefight isn't the smartest thing to do. They are too worried about not dying rather than worrying about New Coke, or whatever they were trying to advertise.

I remember playing Battlefield 2142 and I saw a billboard advertising an Intel Core 2 Duo...wait, it's 21..42. Not 2007.
It can kinda break immersion if you really get into a game.
And what this guy said. When you are really into a game you don't notice stuff like that. I never did and i will never do it either.
 

Aggieknight

New member
Dec 6, 2009
229
0
0
As others have already said - nothing turns me off to a game faster than in game ads.

I've stopped playing franchises because of it - I'm looking at you NCAA Footbal, and your gawd awful Pontiac ads (yeah, that's several years ago).
 

ionveau

New member
Nov 22, 2009
493
0
0
No no no it helps the developers and anyone who hates it is a entitled casual that has no respect for the hard work of the developers that do so much and ask for almost nothing
 

ssh00

New member
Dec 20, 2010
1
0
0
Tom Phoenix said:
rembrandtqeinstein said:
If I ever pay for a game and later find out it has advertising I will return it as defective.
Preety much. I am not willing to pay $60 for the privilege of being shoved advertisements down my throat. I already have to deal with that every time I watch television or go outside.

Anyway, this isn't anything suprising. I could have told Cousens that in-game advertising wasn't worth it three years ago. Customer is law and there is nothing beneficial for the customer when it comes to in-game advertising.
While you may pay for your software, a growing number of consumers are not. Hence, developers are forced to inject advertising, etc. into software to generate revenue to *pay* for their efforts.

Note to software pirates: you cannot expect to rely on teenage hackers living in their parents' basement to develop the majority of your software for you.
 

Sniper Team 4

New member
Apr 28, 2010
5,433
0
0
...Yeah. I think I can run EA. I could have told them this back when it started. In game ads simply don't work. For me, they break immersion when I do notice them--which isn't often. I'll be playing a game, then suddenly start thinking about the product. No more immersion.

It worked in Alan Wake because I was using Energizer batteries, but that's it.
 

Citrus

New member
Apr 25, 2008
1,420
0
0
In-game ads have always had the opposite effect they were intended to on me. I'd see some out-of-place ad in a game, find it distasteful, and then as a result find the product distasteful as well.
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
I'm just going to file this under the same opinions i have on internet advertising. Everybody resents it and i can't see it ever 'working'. Everyone hates youtube adverts with a burning passion and it's considered tasteless, even by reviewers (gamespot for example) to include in-game advertising. It's intrusive, heavy-handed marketing that will just have the adverse effect and yet we still see it every single day in every little thing they can cram a 30 second or side banner advert in to. I can't honestly believe who the hell thinks, after being forced to watch a long 30 second clip before a five minute video "Hmm yeah you know what i totally needed that new makeup / gadget / whatever." I think there's such an obsession with marketing and advertisement now. It's not about what will 'pay off'. They just want to drum their message into your brain.

God i hate marketing.
 

ewhac

Digital Spellweaver
Legacy
Escapist +
Sep 2, 2009
575
0
21
San Francisco Peninsula
Country
USA
Andy Chalk said:
Cousens, the general manager of EA's free-to-play business, said the money just isn't there, at least not in the form envisioned back in the day. "We actually aren't getting much from ad revenue at all," he said in an interview with Edge [http://www.next-gen.biz/news/ea-in-game-ads-no-great-shakes]. "The in-game advertising business hasn't grown as fast as people expected it to."
File under, "Dur-Hey."
 

dcrane

New member
Sep 8, 2010
63
0
0
Tom Phoenix said:
rembrandtqeinstein said:
If I ever pay for a game and later find out it has advertising I will return it as defective.
Preety much. I am not willing to pay $60 for the privilege of being shoved advertisements down my throat...
I take it you haven't been to a movie theater lately. Me, the kids, plus popcorn = $50 and I still have to sit through the corporate commercials and trailer commercials before the damn movie starts.
 

VondeVon

New member
Dec 30, 2009
686
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
"...I'm not convinced that we'll have billboards in games and things like that. Maybe those days are over."
*Blink*

When were those days ever here? I know I can be a contrary little madam at times, but seeing an in-game ad is more likely to make me think negatively of that product than anything else.
 

runedeadthA

New member
Feb 18, 2009
437
0
0
Phishfood said:
shaboinkin said:
They need to realize, when someone is actively engaged in playing an intense match of [insert game here], there really isn't much to get them distracted. So putting an ad in the middle of a firefight isn't the smartest thing to do. They are too worried about not dying rather than worrying about New Coke, or whatever they were trying to advertise.

I remember playing Battlefield 2142 and I saw a billboard advertising an Intel Core 2 Duo...wait, it's 21..42. Not 2007.
It can kinda break immersion if you really get into a game.


Exactly. I remember being vaugely aware of those ads, but heres the thing...people who are playing online multiplayer fps probably already have a damn good processor and so the ad is wasted anyway. I don't object to billboards ingame being for rl things, but the targetting of the ads was so crap....and its so subliminal to have no effect.
Not to mention Gamers HATE ads, they don't want their gameplay interrupted by big flashing signs, or have to wait 30 seconds for their damn youtube video to load. Upon seeing an ad in game a gamer is more likely to go "Toyata huh? Well fuck them I'm never buying from those arseholes EVER."
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
runedeadthA said:
Not to mention Gamers HATE ads, they don't want their gameplay interrupted by big flashing signs, or have to wait 30 seconds for their damn youtube video to load. Upon seeing an ad in game a gamer is more likely to go "Toyata huh? Well fuck them I'm never buying from those arseholes EVER."
Exactly, those crap Toyata ad's they show on youtube before the video starts piss me off to no end and pretty much promises that I will never have anything to do with their cars thanks to those ad's. If it was those little crappy ad's at the bottom of the you can vanish by clicking on the little "x" I wouldn't have nearly as much of a problem than with those crappy thirty second ad's they use before the video loads up.