Again... do you HONESTLY see EA doing insane sales on their games? Hell no. And that's the problem with a lot of these people who try to compete with Steam: they see Steam is successful and popular, but don't bother researching into HOW and WHY they're popular.Echo136 said:Its not a bad idea at all. I only started using STEAM because of Team Fortress Classic and Half-Life 2, and then the Orange Box, and then it just snowballed from there and now I own over 100 games on STEAM. If it hadn't been for the Valve games I wouldnt have ever used it at all.Sean Strife said:Yeaaaaaaaaaaaah... this idea's gonna tank. And tank horribly. They'll wind up going back to Steam once Origin fails miserably.
Well, the only way it will be able to compete is if EA can do insane sales like STEAM
you do know that Steam was ones only Valve´s own games and non others right???IKWerewolf said:Can't argue with any of the statements. The trouble is it is Steam vs EA. EA constantly uses Perisistant online connection where as at most Steam uses one time sign in online to validate the copy, WIN to Steam.
EA is only just starting out with this project whereas Steam has expierience with this sort of process, WIN to Steam.
EA will only be dealing with one pulisher, i.e. themselves. Steam has a multi-publisher network varying from indie to major publishers, WIN to Steam
Valve enjoys taking innovative ideas and making them viable and giving Indie Game Firms the cruicial stepping stone into the industry, do you see EA doing this, WIN to Steam.
4-0 to Steam, the term "look out below" screams in my mind as EA sales plummet through the floor.
True enough but look at Valves reputation and look at EAs and tell me who you'd rather partner up to distribute your game digitally? Ya it's Valve, EA is gonna have to really do something special too attract other developers and publishers to their service, since most of them see EA as competition.xsoenx said:you do know that Steam was once only Valve´s own games and non others right???IKWerewolf said:Can't argue with any of the statements. The trouble is it is Steam vs EA. EA constantly uses Perisistant online connection where as at most Steam uses one time sign in online to validate the copy, WIN to Steam.
EA is only just starting out with this project whereas Steam has expierience with this sort of process, WIN to Steam.
EA will only be dealing with one pulisher, i.e. themselves. Steam has a multi-publisher network varying from indie to major publishers, WIN to Steam
Valve enjoys taking innovative ideas and making them viable and giving Indie Game Firms the cruicial stepping stone into the industry, do you see EA doing this, WIN to Steam.
4-0 to Steam, the term "look out below" screams in my mind as EA sales plummet through the floor.
Oh, nice Don Quixote reference there.9_6 said:Ah good.
A major dumbass who thinks it's a briliant idea to wrap steam games -even demos- in additional layers of DRM won't be polluting steam with their games anymore.
Good riddance.
And yeah, good luck fighting windmills. Bloodthirsty windmills with chainsaws for fans.
I don't really think they do. The purpose of market competition is to keep prices low and supply plentiful. Steam already has low prices and supply isn't a problem with digital goods. But I could just be missing somethingMr. Omega said:On one hand, Steam needs competition.
synobal said:True enough but look at Valves reputation and look at EAs and tell me who you'd rather partner up to distribute your game digitally? Ya it's Valve, EA is gonna have to really do something special too attract other developers and publishers to their service, since most of them see EA as competition.xsoenx said:you do know that Steam was once only Valve´s own games and non others right???IKWerewolf said:Can't argue with any of the statements. The trouble is it is Steam vs EA. EA constantly uses Perisistant online connection where as at most Steam uses one time sign in online to validate the copy, WIN to Steam.
EA is only just starting out with this project whereas Steam has expierience with this sort of process, WIN to Steam.
EA will only be dealing with one pulisher, i.e. themselves. Steam has a multi-publisher network varying from indie to major publishers, WIN to Steam
Valve enjoys taking innovative ideas and making them viable and giving Indie Game Firms the cruicial stepping stone into the industry, do you see EA doing this, WIN to Steam.
4-0 to Steam, the term "look out below" screams in my mind as EA sales plummet through the floor.
and Valve is not competition??? i myself is not supporting EA (since they force you to paid for half the stuff on your game disc and just buy-out companies that make a few good titles and then shut them down)but Steam was back in the day hated by many people because they didn´t wan´t to start another program up.synobal said:True enough but look at Valves reputation and look at EAs and tell me who you'd rather partner up to distribute your game digitally? Ya it's Valve, EA is gonna have to really do something special too attract other developers and publishers to their service, since most of them see EA as competition.xsoenx said:you do know that Steam was once only Valve´s own games and non others right???IKWerewolf said:Can't argue with any of the statements. The trouble is it is Steam vs EA. EA constantly uses Perisistant online connection where as at most Steam uses one time sign in online to validate the copy, WIN to Steam.
EA is only just starting out with this project whereas Steam has expierience with this sort of process, WIN to Steam.
EA will only be dealing with one pulisher, i.e. themselves. Steam has a multi-publisher network varying from indie to major publishers, WIN to Steam
Valve enjoys taking innovative ideas and making them viable and giving Indie Game Firms the cruicial stepping stone into the industry, do you see EA doing this, WIN to Steam.
4-0 to Steam, the term "look out below" screams in my mind as EA sales plummet through the floor.
Yes, because I love having to open 20 different things to play certain games, and thats exactly what I want to do *sarcasm* Steam really doesn't need any competitors, because its more reliable to start with, and the additional fact that it would be like an art show, building is steam, and the art are games, each are put up for bid and sold inside the steam building, but the dev's are still getting money. It won't matter if every big giant stands up and does this, because most people don't have only one publisher / developer they only play games from, its just ruining the whole market of online sales for games over these services, because its a fucking hassle to log on [and sign up] to each and every one of them, get your games, and look at what game you will want to play. Even when said and done, it'll have the issue of having to log on and find every game you have through these , but also you will have to sign up through them, making any email full to the power of FUCK! I see plenty of way steam knock offs could fail in every way, early, to all said and done, and steam is mostly 3rd partied anyways, so having everyone take their games back for their own shops would kill steam and valve, the company that made many great games. And would you REALLY want to have to sign up / log into 7 or 8 other things to find and play your games, not counting if you lose a password and have to reset it?babinro said:I look forward to this change personally. While I believe it'll take 2-4 years for this Origin thing to get anywhere...I like the potential that other Steam competitors might bring to what is essentially a monopoly at this point.
I have nothing personal against Steam...but having other high end developers compete against them will likely be a good thing when its all said and done.