No one reading this will be a live in 100 years, so who cares! Live for the moment. But personally I think articles like this are just scare tactics written by looney eco-weirdos.Griffolion said:[a href="http://www.tomsguide.com/us/science-research-sustainability-end-of-the-world-collapse,news-15482.html"]So I just read this article[/a], and I'm having a hard time discerning whether this is a set of scare tactics or actually viable.
Is the earth, in the next 100 years, going to go into a cataclysmic state shift, similar in potency to the one that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs? What do you guys think?
madster11 said:The Earth goes through these climate shifts all the time, fairly regularly. Humanity is slightly speeding the process at the moment, but overall not by anywhere near enough to cause us to kill off 1/2 our population and suddenly start using solar energy for everything.
We're fairly close to the next ice age at the moment, but 'fairly close' in terms for the planet would mean 200-400 years before we start seeing any real climate change that would affect us humans (oh no! it's like 4 degrees colder, whatever will we do? - my 40 year old son).
Simple fact is that the earth isn't static. It won't have the exact same shape and climate is has right now forever. It's constantly changing, and if you want to be really depressed now that it's almost certain that it will look like mars before the sun starts expanding.
Will this affect humans? Yes.
Will it wipe humans out? No. Even if it killed 99% of humans there's enough left to overpopulate Australia, and i strongly doubt an ice age would make, say, the Russians give even a single shit.
Will it destroy the Earth? No. Life will survive - albeit changed - for longer than humans will. Maybe in 2000 years humans will be dead and the dominant species on the planet will be Crows, who explore old human ruins and laugh at our claims to be 'intelligent'.
Does any of this affect anyone reading this right now?
...Well, unless you're 5yo girl and live in the Shimane prefecture, that's a no.
The threat to us young people right now is not our planet. It's our aging society and overpopulation, which is going to cause economic collapse all over the world and very likely kill more people than our bro of a planet ever will.
The expected end of the world in 1666 comes to mind, the end of all times of 2000 as well. At least this one isn't based in numerology.JesterRaiin said:Doomsday theories are as old as humanity itself. And guess what, we're still here.
Point is : we're not capable of predicting exact weather for next day with 100% accuracy. We can't be sure about events taking place 50-100 years ago. But we're soooooooo sure that some apocalypse is imminent because, hey, we're living in the end times of the tenths of thousands years old cycle. Hooray for science.
Yeah, right.
I see you've been looking up George Carlin lately.Bassik said:Eh, the Earth is going to be fine. It survived a whole lot more then anything we can throw at it. The Permian mass extinction comes to mind, almost all life was obliterated, and the survivers went and became fucking dinosaurs, so you just know the earth is going to be fine.
It's just us that's fucked, no biggy.![]()
Not really, but I watched him a lot in my teens, so maybe that's it. Still, it can't be an actual quote of him because I made this up this afternoon.SpaceBat said:I see you've been looking up George Carlin lately.Bassik said:Eh, the Earth is going to be fine. It survived a whole lot more then anything we can throw at it. The Permian mass extinction comes to mind, almost all life was obliterated, and the survivers went and became fucking dinosaurs, so you just know the earth is going to be fine.
It's just us that's fucked, no biggy.![]()
Yeah. Pretty much every second one of those special numbers "happens". 666 atoms of something flies through something else. 42 stars change into super-novas. Follower of some New Age cult reads some ritual for 23rd time this month. 13 stars align in one line.keiji_Maeda said:The expected end of the world in 1666 comes to mind, the end of all times of 2000 as well. At least this one isn't based in numerology.
Let me resurrect Mr. Carlin for a few minutes... ;]keiji_Maeda said:I find the article pretty vague and pandering to populist fears. But i do believes that humanity as a whole is screwing up Mother Earth too much. Gaia needs to be care for.
But how will we do it though? Tell all the developing countries to stop trying to get on their feet? Cut down on living standards? Go vegan? There are a lot of possible solutions but no clear cut one, and using scientific rationality we have to verify and research them before we validate even considering their feasability.
I'm strongly against it. It doesn't change a thing where we'll go. We'll stay the way we are now and were since the beginning - petty, greedy thieves, proud of our little, shiny trinkets, afraid of anything that challenges the vision of the way world works we created for ourselves. Until we'll grow up enough to cease destroying everything we don't understand, we shouldn't move out of our sandbox yet.keiji_Maeda said:Saying it again, we should REALLY start up with the space exploration again.
Oh no! They got Sarah! She is in a conga line!DVS BSTrD said:The Latinos are mutating!
And they are HEATING UP THE PLANET!
Could always have yourself frozen.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:You know what makes me kinda depressed? I mean, yeah, I guess humanity dying out at some point and all. But if that happens and there is some sort of ice age, new life will develop afterwards. And I won't be around to see that new life. I'll never know what it looks like, how the Earth will be in another 3000 years time.
![]()
We need to save people! Why don't we kill most of them, then that way it won't kill them because they'll already be dead! It's genius I say. -__-Kodlak said:From the article: "The researchers believe that a planetary shift cannot be avoided anymore. However, the impact can be delayed or minimized, if we "drastically" lower the planet's population "very quickly","
Erm... are they implying what I think they are? Has science just condoned mass killings?!