Jadak said:
While I'm not sure how 99+264 is considered a flop next to 178, can't really object to them thinking they can do better with a different name. But definitely rather pointless at this stage.
J Tyran said:
Poor Warner Brothers, I feel so bad for them... The movie only made $185,000,000 more than its production budget? Hard times for these movie makers, hard times.
I blame the pirates...
They apparently had to do rewrites and reshoots and that was about $50 million (which wasn't included in the production budget).
Then you need to account for the fact that cinemas get at least 1/3 of the gross.
Then you need to add around $30-50 million for the marketing campaign.
So you're left with the studio making less than the movie's budget.
I think that they will make it back on DVD/Blu Ray/Netflix/etc.
This movie was really good and people online have been raving about it (I know, I was one of them).
Changing the name?
I don't know about that. People know it as Edge of Tomorrow and those who haven't seen it but heard it was good will look for it under that name.
Also, it wasn't the name that brought the less than expected earnings in my opinion.
It was the shitty marketing campaign.
The trailers made it look so much worse than it was.
I only went so see it because my other plans on that day got cancelled and I didn't want to see X-Men because I got bored during Wolverine last year.
This movie did very well for Cruise's "street cred" though.
He's 52 but he's still on top of his game.
I think that because this movie was so well received, more people will go to see MI5 next year.