It was a trick question. Digital evidence can be exculpatory evidence. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Welp, Trump gave tax cuts to all of us and made drug prices cheaper, including removing the financial penalty for not having healthcare.
Maybe your assumption, that all these people are stupid, is wrong?
It isn't. Facts matter. The disastrous results of Trump's presidency could have easily been predicted, and were predicted by people who are far from geniuses. The writing was on the wall, the floor and the fuckin' roof. Everything about Trump is obvious. It's surface level. It doesn't take a genius to realize that he's an incompetent idiot. It doesn't take a genius to find verifiable evidence stretching back decades, that show that he's a moron who was involved in some highly questionable and likely criminal activities. So yes, it absolutely takes a fuckin' idiot to vote for the guy. Especially twice.
Do you know for a fact that 74 million people are "stupid", where "stupidity" is subjective and has no factual meaning?
Time for Pence to make his choice. Democracy or Donald Trump.
Pence released a statement earlier that said he wouldn't, and doesn't have the power to unilaterally control or count the votes.
Stupidity absolutely has factual meaning. If you continuously do stupid things that don't benefit you, if you can't figure out what's best for you and instead you trust a lying degenerate conman instead, guess what? You're fuckin' stupid. 74 million people did that.
Do you think you could keep this up for two more years, please? I'd really like the Republican vote to stay low in the midterms.
Because like most voters they just saw their favoured Party's initials/symbol, and made their mark solely on that.
I know we're not supposed to call them terrorists because they're white, but you'd think at some point that would matter less than their actions...
