My expectations and hopes are lowered but not destroyed. Ea and the developers under them have had a few cock-ups but they release some solid games. I'll keep some hope but not much.
Agreed.Akalabeth said:What standards would you prefer?Doom972 said:Why not just resurrect LJN and let them have the contract? If you're going to be evil and greedy go all the way.
The problem is that as long as this contract is valid, only EA will be able to make Star Wars games. We already know what EA's standard's are.Akalabeth said:Seriously people wait for the flippin games to be released before you put on your drama queen dress.
Isn't everyone always bitching for a new Star Wars Battlefront? And the guys who make Battlefield are gonna be making Star Wars games?
SEGA/Gearbox standards - buggy game that doesn't match up to expectations
What about Half Life 1 & 2 + the episodes, and the Portal games? Regardless of your personal opinion on them, they clearly are one of the best at single-player storytelling. Also, A Jedi Knight-like multiplayer game with tradable hats sounds good right now.Valve Standards - Multiplayer only. Games never released
Agreed.Epic Standards - Nice third person action but no story worth giving two shits about.
Agreed.Some of the other places like Activision/Ubisoft whatever have always online DRM or auction houses and that sort of nonsense as well.
They might do something good with it, but the fact that the contract is EXCLUSIVE to EA is the problem. This means that nobody else will get a chance at a Star Wars game anytime soon.The only standard that I know is that EA will throw a huge pile of money at it. They've done good games and bad games. On which side of the line it will fall remains to be seen
Normally I would but I've pretty much been fed-up with the bullshit in Star Wars back when Dave Fiolini's hat first came into view. Yes, some things have improved, but it's a bit too little, too late. Maybe the new trilogy will interest me, but the EU is a mess now more than ever, and while I'll sure as hell be interested in the games, I won't be playing them for the sake of it being Star Wars like I used to.nima55 said:Frankly I find that sad. To have lost you passion for a thing you liked. I pity you, friend.Parakeettheprawn said:*pauses and thinks to self*
Something weird is happening... I'm... not breaking out into a rage.
My gosh... I finally did it... I LET GO OF BEING A STAR WARS NERD! I'M MERELY HOPEFUL THAT VISCERAL AND DICE PRODUCE FUN GAMES! It's finally happened! I AM SO HAPPY!
*glances at everyone raging while he frankly doesn't give a crap at this point*
...*sigh* that lasted a long time now didn't it?
This, so much this. If anyone can do a great Battlefront game, it's DICE. The only thing that really does worry me is how DRM will be handled.Reyalsfeihc said:Wow, glad to see no one is throwing about any knee-jerk reactions here. Yes, EA has pulled some stupid s*** in the past couple of years, but let's think about the studios that they're handing the franchise off to, and what games will be handled by them.
We have DICE, which is the obvious contender to develop Battlefront 3. As someone who absolutely loved the early BF games, and Battlefield 3, I'm not too concerned about them getting their hands on the Battlefront IP. We're not going to see a super gritty, color drained Battlefront game, as Battlefield is that way simply because it's stylized, and that's the direction they're taking it in. There's a lot to learn from the style and color pallets of Battlefront 1 & 2, and I'm sure that DICE will realize this when/if they begin development. Also, they would be the most likely of the three studios to develop sequels to Republic Commando.
Visceral could easily also pick up Republic Commando, but I really see them picking up StarWars 1313 where it left off. The seedy underbelly vibe of the game fits with the darker themes of the Dead Space franchise, and their experience with 3rd Person shooter mechanics is the strongest of the three teams. What new games would come out of Visceral, I'm not sure. There are a lot of space combat games that are desperately crying out for sequels, but whether they would be picked up by Visceral who, as a studio is still in its infancy and not locked into a specific genre of video games, or by DICE who will have to have some experience under their belt with space combat to make a true sequel to BF2, is uncertain.
Bioware is arguably the most confusing of the three in terms of where their projects will take them. We'll probably see some KoToR-esque sequels to past franchises out of them, alongside continued development of The Old Republic until they run that into the ground. I'm unsure what new IP's will come out of their studios, as all I've ever known them for is Action-RPG's, but they definitely have the talent (at least outside of the writing department), to develop various types of titles.
All in all, we're talking about three well received (for the most part) studios with a bit of a troubled past in some regard, but all more than willing to handle new and old IP's within the Star Wars universe.
TL;DR: Let's put those torches and pitchforks on layaway until we see some actual product.
Condescend much?Devoneaux said:Except they were supposed to look how Luke saw them, or how they actually looked at the time they died (Why doesn't old ben look like young ben if this isn't the case?). Then again guessing by that avatar, little details aren't really all that important to you anyway.Saviordd1 said:Am I the only one who didn't mind that edit?DVS BSTrD said:Also Andy, don't ever use that picture again.
Like the new movies or not, they are part of the canon, and it makes sense for Anakins ghost to...well look like anakin.
OT: Well, those are good devs, but how bad is EA gonna fuck those games up with micro transactions?
OT: Yep, this falls in line pretty much with my expectations. Maybe Disney will wise up at some point.
Akalabeth said:How is exclusivity over the franchise to one publisher a good thing? Why would you prefer that only EA would get to make Star Wars games?Doom972 said:I don't actually find that a bad thing. The direction that Star Wars games have taken recently to me does not reflect the movies I grew up with. Like the grossly overpowered, superhero warriors that Jedi are now represented as for example. Again what happened to "Guardians of Peace". A lot of the movies seem to portray them more as Agents of Destruction and Death. And part of that problem is the prequel movies which frankly ruined a lot of the mythos. So games now build off the new mythos, which is shit.Doom972 said:They might do something good with it, but the fact that the contract is EXCLUSIVE to EA is the problem. This means that nobody else will get a chance at a Star Wars game anytime soon.