Ellen Page Nudity in Beyond: Two Souls Triggers Aggressive Sony Response

Recommended Videos

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
Is it a big deal? No.

Is it awkward as hell for Sony? Ya, I'd say so. Also good job removing them from the internet, it took an entire 5 seconds to find them on google image.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Ldude893 said:
Yeah, if you give people access to a CGI doppleganger of a real life celebrity, you're going to best bet that people will exploit it somehow.
They didn't need to help people exploit it, though.

CriticalMiss said:
I wonder if they are going to patch it out somehow, since the screenshots will just keep showing up until they do.
It's not an issue of patching it out. People already have access. I doubt they just posted it directly to the internet with not intermediary.

Gearhead mk2 said:
Also... how old is Ellen's character in that game? Just looking at that mugshot, she looks like a teenager.
The descriptions said you follow her through like fifteen years of her life. I'd assume it comes from later.

Niccolo said:
Y'know, as long as the character portrayed is over 18 I don't really see what the big issue is.
The big issue, evidently, is that this is content that wasn't supposed to exist. I mean, did anyone read the article?

an annoyed writer said:
What did she expect?
She should have expected the studio itself to make anatomically correct versions of her that were unnecessary to the final product but contained, obviously.

No, seriously, what about that train of thought strikes you as reasonable. This isn't "Rule 34." This isn't someone making a nude patch or adding textures to a scene. This was done in-house.

04whim said:
I felt a microscopic amount of sympathy for her at first. Then I was reminded that she got mad at Naughty Dog for making a character that looked a little bit like her and yeah, I suddenly don't care.
Nothing she said really sounded "mad." She even qualified the statement by saying she should probably be flattered.

That's about as innocuous as you can get.
 

an annoyed writer

Exalted Lady of The Meep :3
Jun 21, 2012
1,406
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
an annoyed writer said:
What did she expect?
She should have expected the studio itself to make anatomically correct versions of her that were unnecessary to the final product but contained, obviously.

No, seriously, what about that train of thought strikes you as reasonable. This isn't "Rule 34." This isn't someone making a nude patch or adding textures to a scene. This was done in-house.
I'm more jaded than anything about it, honestly. Cage has a history of putting nudity in his games, and I simply wasn't surprised about this showing up, since it sounds like something he, as a director, approves, whether the actors/actresses like it or not.
 

TheCommanders

ohmygodimonfire
Nov 30, 2011
589
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Why would you render her bits if you aren't going to show them? Wouldn't it have been much easier to make her look like a Barbie doll?
Someone might have pointed this out already, but I felt like interjecting my knowlege of Mass Effect trivia for very little reason. That's exactly what they did for the romance scenes in ME1, in addition to tastful camera angles (nothing important showing). Although jury's out on whether that was to avoid this sort of thing, or just because they didn't wan't to bother making a fully detailed nude model for a 15 second scene (not to mention that it would have to be dynamic because Shepard's skin color can change). Either way, better option.

OT- Not that I was really complaining at the time, but the sex/nudity in Heavy Rain seemed pretty pointless. I don't know about the context in Beyond Two Souls, but if it's more of the same, that would make the situation even more awkward for sony to explain. One has to wonder how long the cinematographers and animators spent with that scene:

"Hey guys, hows that shower scene coming?"

"Uh.... *(hushed whispers: tell them we need another week)* We need another week or two boss!"

"Okay then..."
 

Niccolo

New member
Dec 15, 2007
274
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
The big issue, evidently, is that this is content that wasn't supposed to exist. I mean, did anyone read the article?
No, I thought I'd just comment on a story like a dipshit. Of course I read it. And since Quantic Dream didn't scan her naked body into the game without her consent, I don't see what the big deal is. Yes, there's possibly a 'no unauthorised nudity of me' clause in Ellen's contract, but the whole thing can only really be accessed with a developer console. Quantic Dream has a history of pulling this kind of crap, contractually bound to not do this or whatever, so honestly I find myself thinking "it's just some boobs, give it a week and we'll all be talking about something else."
 

ThunderCavalier

New member
Nov 21, 2009
1,475
0
0
Oh, the stupid is very strong with every facet of this story.

My condolences go out to Page there. She must be getting really annoyed about all of the recent debacles about her. If she didn't know that her CGI figure was this... detailed, someone is SO dying.
 

Diserasta

New member
Jul 13, 2009
38
0
0
Uh, guys? She has nipples. No vagina. No pubic hair. NIPPLES. I fail to see how that is "full detail". More importantly, it's SOP for studios to design their models naked; it allows you a greater fidelity. Usually they're barbie doll models, but nipples are usually included in things that are supposed to be realistic. Why? Because they can have an effect on the clothing. The clothes are added later. Now, if you had a character doing a shower scene, you'd have her naked, right?
Honestly, I fail to see how this has any bearing. It's not like these "are" Ellen Page's nipples. They're probably around the right size (since she did mo-cap for the game), but they aren't modeled on her breasts. And even then, how is nipples "full detail"? Plenty of games have nipples on their stock models. It's not that much of a big deal.
 

Lono Shrugged

New member
May 7, 2009
1,467
0
0
RicoADF said:
Lono Shrugged said:
In fairness, it would be mighty creepy to find out that a bunch of people who you did some mo cap acting for rendered your nude body to an insane detail. I mean breasts are one thing. Full body nudity without consent is pretty unprofessional at the very least.
According to a fellow poster who has looked up the image (I'm at work atm, so wont for obvious reasons), it isn't a full body render just the breasts and body, nothing down below. If thats the case then it's not unusual, it's probably just the character's model with not cloths on, no effort required and since their not showing the parts you can't tell.

If that is indeed the case then someone is making a big deal out of nothing, other than maybe Sony being pissed that their model is stolen (copyright infringement) and to cover their ass just incase. Also this title is misleading.

No I just checked it out, they rendered her ladyparts with pubes and all. (Thanks for obligating me to actually do that by the way. :p)

And wow it is actually quite detailed and realistic, creepy. I do agree totally it is Sony covering their ass as they are probably rubbing their hands with glee at the free Ellen Page naked press this is getting.
 

Griffolion

Elite Member
Aug 18, 2009
2,205
0
41
I'm honestly not sure what they expected. You're making a game with a female protagonist. Someone, somewhere, is bound to try and get some sort of nude images of them. It happened to Lara Croft way back in the day (though I think she wasn't really modelled on a real person to the extent Jodie is to Ellen Page). I guess this is the sad nature of the games culture we live in.

Just a quick, slightly unrelated question about BTS, was the shower scene required? Was it tasteful? Just curious.
 

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,146
0
0
Lono Shrugged said:
No I just checked it out, they rendered her ladyparts with pubes and all. (Thanks for obligating me to actually do that by the way. :p)

And wow it is actually quite detailed and realistic, creepy. I do agree totally it is Sony covering their ass as they are probably rubbing their hands with glee at the free Ellen Page naked press this is getting.
In that case disregard my previous post, although it is still likely the model you see ingame without cloths on. This isn't that uncommon as models of people on model sites are anatomically correct, so it appears to be standard for models. A quick search on turbosquid etc of people will show lots of 3D male/female models that are correct, with and without cloths.
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
Isn't content control of that kind usually the role of the publisher's production department?

Or of the first party? I know for a fact that Nintendo's Lotcheck team takes content VERY seriously.

So, erm, who's the First Party? Sony.
Who's the Publisher? Sony.
Who missed that? Sony.
Who is getting mad after the fact? Sony.

Notice anything?
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
I guess it makes sense that they'd render the entire body. Anything less and it'd be too few polygons to accuratly capture emotions (Yes, I know character models are generally fully rendered regardless, just joking).

It's not like it is actually ellen page's body. It's still just 1's and 0's and it's only the fact that it was modeled after a known star that makes people pay attention. Weird as I've never thought of her as a physically attractive actress. I've always enjoyed her character's personalities and she's pretty. But I never thought of her body as anything particularly above average.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Me55enger said:
I would suggest there is going to be a cover up but clearly they're not very good at them.

Still, another notch on the bedpost for the lumbering hulk that is the sex question in gaming.
This has nothing to do with sex in gaming and everything to do with "Oh, you goddamned pervs, what the bloody hell".

Can't say I'd be very impressed if I shot a scene in a mo-cap suit where I was, say, sleeping, and the devs then rendered the scene complete with my dick and covered it with a blanket, hoping no one would notice.

I'm not exceedingly attractive either, so don't bring up that silliness of "well, she's not a stunner, so what does she care?" It's an incredibly stupid and demeaning thing to bring up.
 

Spaceman Spiff

New member
Sep 23, 2013
604
0
0
I went and found the pictures and I don't see what the big deal is. During normal gameplay nobody is going to see the digital breasts in question.

As to why the devs modeled them to begin with; maybe it's SOP to do a full detailed model, maybe they weren't sure exactly what they wanted to show, or maybe they didn't know what would show until they nailed down all the character motions and camera angles.

In any case, if Sony wanted the discovery to go away, they should have just stayed quiet and let the brief interest in it flare up and quickly die. Instead they've built a stage around it and put a spotlight on it.
 

Tentaquil

New member
Oct 21, 2011
86
0
0
Why are they so buttmad about this. It says in the source article that the body is not even that of Page's, and why bother render it if they didn't expect SOMEONE in the many people who play it to see it.

But I guess....


Her body wasn't ready....
 

Someone Depressing

New member
Jan 16, 2011
2,416
0
0
Why, David Cage? Why do all of your games have nude models which go unused, and someone finds them, and it causes an uproar? You're laughing right now, aren't you?

David Cage sucks. And this is kind of creepy because Ellen Page could pass as a young boy.