I think also people in Geekdom are partially fans of her because of her minor role as Kitty Pryde aka Shadowcat in the X-Men The Last Stand movie (which is hated and rightly so)... But other than that I have no clue what the infatuation with her is.Credossuck said:Juno. The boring girl from juno.Aardvaarkman said:Who the hell is Ellen Page, is she the one who starred in that 90s sitcom Ellen?
Whats juno? A boring film. About teen preg and adoption crazy people.
I think that was just the headlines that stated that.04whim said:I felt a microscopic amount of sympathy for her at first. Then I was reminded that she got mad at Naughty Dog for making a character that looked a little bit like her and yeah, I suddenly don't care.
But then the modeller and animator wouldn't have had so much fun....thaluikhain said:Why would you render her bits if you aren't going to show them? Wouldn't it have been much easier to make her look like a Barbie doll?
Just to add to this post (and I'm sure this has probably been said in the previous pages), its not uncommon for models to be fully rendered / drawn. This isn't something to do with Ellen Page specifically. Even the Cave Troll in LOTR had fully rendered genitals, with accompanying physics to boot. The only difference I suppose is that no one is trying to hack that to get to see what's under the loin cloth (what am I saying, its the Internet, I'm sure its SOMEONE's thing)Jingle Fett said:As far as why they'd include the naughty bits if they didn't intend to show them in-game...
Can you name one other anatomically correct model in one of his games?an annoyed writer said:I'm more jaded than anything about it, honestly. Cage has a history of putting nudity in his games, and I simply wasn't surprised about this showing up, since it sounds like something he, as a director, approves, whether the actors/actresses like it or not.
A sculptor is unlikely to spend extra time on detail that won't be shown. Painters don't generally paint fully-drawn boobs then cover them up.Jingle Fett said:Not including them would be like spending dozens of hours making an anatomically correct marble statue, and then for whatever reason just not including the nipples and the rest of the stuff.
Zachary Amaranth said:A sculptor is unlikely to spend extra time on detail that won't be shown. Painters don't generally paint fully-drawn boobs then cover them up.Jingle Fett said:Not including them would be like spending dozens of hours making an anatomically correct marble statue, and then for whatever reason just not including the nipples and the rest of the stuff.
We're not talking about assets that aren't included for "whatever reason." We're talking about ones that have no actual for the final product.
This would be roughly like then chiseling pants to cover up a statue's nipples and "the rest of the stuff" you've already carved.
Given most consider Heavy Rain to be a fantastic game at least and even a masterpiece, perhaps you could moderate your insulting and condescending tone? WTF have you done recently? Watched a few Jim Sterling videos and had your mind made for you most probably. When was the last time you pushed the boundary's of an emerging art? Fucking never. Till then, how bout a bit of respect?CJ1145 said:I love everything to do with David Cage's games. They're always such clusterfucks of bad storytelling, poor design, and uninspired pseudo-occult bullshit. You're never bored with them! They're just too awful to be bored with. This is just the cherry on top of his latest Shit Sundae.
Honestly though, I'm not surprised by this. Seriously, not at all. Has everyone forgotten Cage's last nightmare of an "experience", Heavy Rain, where we're introduced to our female protagonist by ogling her in the shower for a disturbingly long time, and then we get to watch her get assaulted by a bunch of masked men and... frankly, possibly raped?
It's a dream sequence but that doesn't make the whole thing entirely disturbing, and NOT for the reasons the designers wanted it to be.