I really dont understand what you mean... :sflarty said:Am I to believe these children are striking back against the catholic church?moggett88 said:bugger homeworld.
I really dont understand what you mean... :sflarty said:Am I to believe these children are striking back against the catholic church?moggett88 said:bugger homeworld.
My main bet is that they'll be in like their underwear or towels or something, otherwise Ender's tactical thinking of soaping himself up won't be shown, and he won't be the boy genius that he was in the book.cursedseishi said:I honestly wouldn't be too surprised to see that particular scene cut or edited in some way as to quickly diminish just how horrifically dangerous to a movie's financial success that kind of scene would be. Seeing "naked boys wrestle in soap" on the headlines of newspapers would pretty much slaughter the potential revenue of the film I would imagine.
I am English, and technically it does, but noone says that...bugger is just a general everyday expletive, like crap.DVS BSTrD said:"bugger" is english slang for turd burgling.moggett88 said:I really dont understand what you mean... :sflarty said:Am I to believe these children are striking back against the catholic church?moggett88 said:bugger homeworld.
Well there was that quick part where it showed them in rows wearing VR type helmets. I woudl think that would be the outside view.klaynexas3 said:It doesn't look terrible, but there are some serious issues I do have. For instance, Ender is shown in some big command center type thing, which is horse shit. They were each in simulation style cock pits, not walking around doing flashy stuff with their hands.
CriticalMiss said:... but I have no intentions of putting money in the pockets of a bigot if I can avoid it.
I would tend to agree. Can a piece of work not be viewed for it's own sake without a prejudgment?Baresark said:Meh, people need to grow up. Your opinion of a man should not influence your opinion of a man's work. Looks interesting enough. Truth be told, I never found OSC all that interesting of a writer. Probably something to do with people always telling me I should like his work.
*sigh*CriticalMiss said:... but I have no intentions of putting money in the pockets of a bigot if I can avoid it.
I fully expect this to be another Eragon, and that saddens me. The good news, however, is that say, Eragon got me to read the books (mainly to understand what the hell happened), so it's possible that the movie will pick interest in the book back up. It's up to you whether or not supporting Card is a good thing (I'm willing to ignore politics to support a work, but I understand some aren't), but I feel that gaining interest in good sci-fi is always a good thing.Xanex said:I do believe that this movie is going to get the "Eragon" treatment. A complete rush job, bastardizing the book to fit it into 2 hours.
I can see that, but the truth is he is very well off and if the movie doesn't do well it probably won't hurt him or change his opinion on gay marriage. People want to paint him like this evil man, but he is only standing up for what he believes in. I don't agree with him one bit on it, but the fruition of hard work should not be denied because I disagree with that one aspect of the man. Maybe he is evil besides that, but the one thing I know he feels differently about than myself should not logically dictate my whole opinion on the guy. That is something I would think everyone can agree with when applying a bit of rational thought to the situation. Also, it is completely subconscious. If his opinion is different from yours and you know nothing else about him but this one thing, the mind will always make the decision for you. Kahneman was pretty explicit about it when he did his research.FargoDog said:It's less about an opinion of a man informing an opinion of his work - though that is more of a subconscious issue - it's that he's not the sort of person many people want to support financially.Baresark said:Meh, people need to grow up. Your opinion of a man should not influence your opinion of a man's work. Looks interesting enough. Truth be told, I never found OSC all that interesting of a writer. Probably something to do with people always telling me I should like his work.
Sure, in the book. I betcha dollars to donuts that whoever is directing this wont be able to resist ending the film on a shot ofDesert Punk said:Actually...moggett88 said:I will probably go to see this - I love the book, and as long as it doesnt go too Michael Bay it shouldnt be awful...although that said, it annoys me that
the trailer contains one of the final moments of the book; the climax where Ender destroys the bugger homeworld. Trailers in general need to stop blowing plot points.
Lets hope that OSC keeps as far away from it as possible.
Er no they didnt. They destroyed a number of bugger worlds with the Dr Device. And the very final attack was delivered by a fighter craft in the home worlds atmosphere to make sure it couldn't be intercepted, the ship that fired the shot in the trailer was one of the capital ships and was a good distance away, definitely not in the atmospehre, so it couldn't have been the final moment.
Man lots of people complaining when they dont even know what they are lookin at ~.~
I honestly thought he was making some kind of "catholics are aliens" comment...I havent been here long, dont know how tolerant people are of religions and whatnot.DVS BSTrD said:Well everyone still knows what crap means, and the context is rather heavilymoggett88 said:I am English, and technically it does, but no one says that...bugger is just a general everyday expletive, like crap.DVS BSTrD said:"bugger" is english slang for turd burgling.moggett88 said:I really dont understand what you mean... :sflarty said:Am I to believe these children are striking back against the catholic church?moggett88 said:bugger homeworld.
what meaning he's using