This seems a little naive, no offence. Who says the best games are the ones that sell best?manythings said:It's kind of rich saying the game "Should have done better" when they were the makers, if it really was that good it should've gotten around by now.
I think for developers nowadays gaming IS about the money, sadly. The publishers and retailers are rolling in it, but the developers themselves, apart from your Valves and Bethesdas, have to be very business-minded just to stay in business. Making games is expensive. Really, the onus is on us consumers to buy interesting, novel games like Enslaved (I think it's a wonderfully imaginative game despite its numerous flaws) and NOT keep buying the familiar, lazy CoD and God of War knock-offs.Karutomaru said:That is such bullshit. Was the game critically well-recieved? Yes? Is there room for a good series? Yes? Would a sequel make people happy? Yes? MAKE A FUCKING SEQUEL!
Gaming is NOT about the money!
I think it was a good foundation. I agree there wouldn't be much point to a straight sequel with the same characters and a continuation of the same story; as you say, the story's finished. But it was such a cool setting and the gameplay had so much potential (most of it unrealised sadly) that I would have been happy to see a sequel to it.Proverbial Jon said:Seriously? Enslaved wasn't even the sort of game that needed a sequel. The story finished, the problems were all solved, where can you possibly go from there?
It was a great game, with incredibly compelling characters and a wonderful setting. But sometimes you have to know when to stop.
Anyone would think there being a whole internet some people might have pointed out how awesome it is, turns out they haven't convinced anyone. Beyond Good and Evil? Amazing game, nothing about Enslaved says it is a patch on Beyond Good and Evil.Hides His Eyes said:This seems a little naive, no offence. Who says the best games are the ones that sell best?manythings said:It's kind of rich saying the game "Should have done better" when they were the makers, if it really was that good it should've gotten around by now.
Pretty much this. I felt genuinely sad when I traded my copy in towards a PS3. It was a great game, with a wonderfully done story. I loved the cast, except Piggy, who annoyed me. Still, this game was a wonderful experience, and one I'll always recommend to people, even years on down the road.Trishbot said:"Enslaved" was one of my favorite games of its year. It was beautiful, lush, original, character-driven, imaginative, charming, dramatic, well-paced, and incredibly fun (especially on the Cloud).
The quality of the game had nothing to do with its lackluster sales. It was just a bad, bad season for a new IP to debut, had bad marketing, and just wasn't able to generate enough interest outside of the over-saturated shooter market.
It was a brilliant game. It still is. If you haven't played it, track the game down and give it a shot. No, it's far from perfect, but you can't get an experience like it an practically any other game. That's what the industry needs, that's what gamers demand, and it's insanely sad that gamers didn't put their money where their mouths were and support the very content they demand while continuing to buy the same schlocky generic brown shooters they complain about every few months.
After failing to meet expectations at retail, the Enslaved series is finished before it could even start.
....Enslaved: Odyssey to the West sold so poorly that a sequel is out of the question.
This the attitude that I genuinely feel maybe the one downfall of this industry; that anything successful needs to be a series. This happens in no other medium; no ones eagerly awaiting the sequel to Se7en, no one want's Fight Club (the book or the film) to turn into a glob trotting adventure series, yet if anything even does remotely well in this medium we all just wait for the inevitable sequel trailer leak.Ninja Theory co-founder Tameem Antoniades believes "Enslaved should have done better. Right now we should have been doing a sequel and perfecting that sequel and doing what franchises do, which is get better over time."
How is it NOT about the money? I'm sorry, but I can't help but find the idea that gaming isn't about the money laughable. 95% (at least) of gaming as we know it wouldn't even exist today if gaming wasn't about the money. And that's because it's an industry, which is all about making product that people want to buy in order to turn a profit.Karutomaru said:That is such bullshit. Was the game critically well-recieved? Yes? Is there room for a good series? Yes? Would a sequel make people happy? Yes? MAKE A FUCKING SEQUEL!
Gaming is NOT about the money!