I feel bad for California. My time there has shown me that it's a beautiful state with some very nice people. Too bad it's state government is so shite.
I, on the other hand, see this as a $1.1M reason to kick stupid legislators out of office come election day. This isn't an organization stealing the lunch money from a bankrupt state. These are elected officials demonstrating the kind of idiocy that led California into debt in the first place. Don't like it (and live in California)? Vote the fuckers out.samsonguy920 said:Much as I cheer at the win in gamers' favor, I don't see California coughing up the cash. Considering they are a bankrupt state(Which makes no sense since their GDP rivals or beats small countries' own. Balance budget much? Obviously not!), better to not put any more pain on the taxpayers there, most of whom could have cared less about the ratings legislation or been on the ESA's stance for their own reasons. I hopeare removed from office before they come up with other dumb ideas to put California further into a money pit.specific California legislators
Better to just call it a win and hold a fundraiser to make up for the expenses.
works for me now where is the dunce cap at....scott91575 said:It's very uncommon in this type of litigation in the US for legal fees to be awarded to the winner. That is normally done in cases of frivolous lawsuits made in bad faith. Which of course could happen since there is evidence they were given fair warning from multiple experts it was unconstitutional. If the ESA is awarded legal fees, that is one more kick in the nuts to the people backing this litigation since it in essence declares them idiots.
Thank you, I was trying to remember his name. He championed the damn bill and wouldn't let it die when it should had. He should be the one to pay.RonHiler said:Make Leland Yee pay it. He wrote the damn law in the first place, he should have to pay to defend it. Plus it would send a message to the California lawmakers. You write a stupid bill, be prepared to pay for it in cold hard cash.
Yeah, it's still taxpayer money, but at least it's taxpayer money already given to Lee.
Is the government not accountable for it's actions? Not like they'll get 1.1 million. There are limitations to the amount you can sue a state over.JediMB said:Err... won't these $1.1 million also be taxpayers' money?
That sounds like a bad idea, considering the state of the US economy.
I don't know, as a Texan I'd like to nominate my state officials for worst in the nation.The Grim Ace said:I may love my state but we have the worst public officials in the US
It will strongly discourage future attempts at bringing up the same thing.New Frontiersman said:On the other hand, they already lost, should they have to pay the legal fees for the side that already won? Will that really help anything?
Sure it is, but that's still the taxpayers' money that is better needed elsewhere.LANCE420 said:Is the government not accountable for it's actions? Not like they'll get 1.1 million. There are limitations to the amount you can sue a state over.JediMB said:Err... won't these $1.1 million also be taxpayers' money?
That sounds like a bad idea, considering the state of the US economy.
I just cracked up....but like the proverbial teabagging that follows the headshot, it's the thought that counts.