I read somewhere Bruce plans to do one final film (sixth).
I can't seem to find a source, does anyone know what I'm talking about.
I can't seem to find a source, does anyone know what I'm talking about.
The order that he liked the Die Hard films. I would swap 2 and 4 but I've never really liked Harlin's films with the lone exception of The Long Kiss Goodnight.Tenmar said:Wait...
1,3,2,4,5? What does that mean?
I'd like to see you do a retrospective piece if you can. List a few movies that you have seen, but can't remember. Granted as a film critic you have seen the movies that were supposed to be big, but that you wound up not remembering an hour after finishing watching. A list of the worst.MovieBob said:MovieBob can't quite remember what happens in Die Hard 5.
Watching the review I was already pretty surprised that they'd end up in Chernobyl, but they actually drove there? Good lord that's retarded.Shirokurou said:- And the biggest of them all... Driving to Chernobyl.
Ok, just take a map and look at where those two are. No seriously do it. They drove all of that in one night or so. And the Maybach may prove pretty useless on the Russian roads. Cause this isn't a German autobahn. This would be bumpy as hell. Also the countryside petrol would kill the maybach.
Also Chernobyl is in Ukraine, which many of you might not know (apparently you don't) is a different country. So Willis would have to cross a national border in a stolen car full of guns with no passport.
And even if he got through that he'd have to get into Chernobyl, which is kinda locked down due to radiation.
Doesn't make any difference - this movie knows that for most people, Chernobyl is just one of those stereotypical, "iconic Russian" things. That's what it thinks of its audience. I bet there will be either a nihilistic and drunk, lecherous and rich, or cold and brutish Russian too.piscian said:Chernobyl isn't Russian![]()
It reminds me of an episode in CSI, in which they were examining the history of a secret Nazi sympathiser. What happened was that some German character had found some Jews in 1940s Berlin, and offered to take them to the border. Instead of taking them to Switzerland though, he tricked them and took them to the Nazis in Auschwitz...Auschwitz is in Poland. He would have had to drive for hundreds of miles when he could have simply driven to the nearest police station. Movies just don't give a shit about geography.SirCannonFodder said:Watching the review I was already pretty surprised that they'd end up in Chernobyl, but they actually drove there? Good lord that's retarded.Shirokurou said:- And the biggest of them all... Driving to Chernobyl.
Ok, just take a map and look at where those two are. No seriously do it. They drove all of that in one night or so. And the Maybach may prove pretty useless on the Russian roads. Cause this isn't a German autobahn. This would be bumpy as hell. Also the countryside petrol would kill the maybach.
Also Chernobyl is in Ukraine, which many of you might not know (apparently you don't) is a different country. So Willis would have to cross a national border in a stolen car full of guns with no passport.
And even if he got through that he'd have to get into Chernobyl, which is kinda locked down due to radiation.
I'm not sure any of the Die Hard movies are supposed to be Die Hard movies. They get a great idea and mold it to fit the McClain story. (I heard particularly of part 1 and 4.)Assassin Xaero said:That, plus Die Hard 3 wasn't even supposed to be a Die Hard movie. Think I heard that once they cast Bruce Willis, they changes a few names around and then made it into one. So that sorta makes it even more sad that the others were worse.piscian said:Chernobyl isn't Russian![]()
No, but it was a Soviet thing, and that's how a lot of Americans still generalize anything to do with Russia.AntiChrist said:I was about to mention that as well. (^-^)piscian said:Chernobyl isn't Russian![]()
oh yeah!~ that one... hahaha... sorry... I only watched the die hard1, and the one with the truck VS jet fighter one... but really... both DieHard/LethalW to me, didn't make much difference in impressions that's why I get them wrong... sorry... hahaFalseprophet said:Damn, I think I have seen every previous Bruce Willis film. Curse this time of year and its lack of decent cinema!
Interestingly, this is the first Die Hard film that was actually written to be a Die Hard film. The first two were based on completely unrelated books--the first was 1968 film starring Frank Sinatra [http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/762646.Nothing_Lasts_Forever]. The third and fourth films were screenplays floating around Hollywood where they penciled in John McClane for the main character.
I was rewatching the series recently, and I pinpointed the moment John McClane changes from vulnerable everyman to invincible superman: Halfway through Die Hard With a Vengeance (i.e. III) he's shot forty feet into the air by a high pressure waterspout and lands on the side of a road with no injuries.luvd1 said:Do people remember the broken glass scene in the first die hard? Where the bad guys realise JM is bare footed so they shoot out all the windows covering the floor with broken glass so he's trapped or has to run across the room slicing his feet to ribbons, which he does and in the next scene you see a floor covered in blood and John McClain in agony pulling glass out of his feet while smoking. And now we have him thrown from a helicopter through a glass window, fall through more glass celings and only get a graze.
Jet Li wasn't in any of the Die Hard films. Were you thinking of Lethal Weapon 4?punipunipyo said:Oh, I watched the one with Jet-Lee in, and I thought it was so pitiful (making Jet looking like the honorable good guy who's ass kicking the stupid cops around)I skipped all the die hard that came after that...
Amazed? I doubt that I'll be amazed that people that "exported democracy" to Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan(our goverment was stupid enough to try the same thing that US did in previous two, but US somehow decided that they'll do better. Of course I'm sure that high reserves of copper and lithium are worth a few hundred thousand "patriots"), once again Iraq and still being able to believe in "bad russians" don't know much.rickynumber24 said:You'd be amazed how many people forget that.piscian said:Chernobyl isn't Russian![]()
Why? Because he goes into the history of the franchise and why it was successful? You're most likely just using the word "pretentious" because you don't like people being smarter and/or more knowledgeable than you are.Father Time said:The fact that you keep doing these quicky deconstructions in almost every review comes off as pretentious and it gets old after a while.