Gorfias said:
Skeleon said:
Gorfias said:
I'm skeptical. I saw #1 on Netflix streaming. It wasn't gouge out my eyes bad. I just didn't love it and I seen nothing in this review that makes me think #3 will change my mind.
The whole bit about "rooting for the villain and the heroes" sounded extremely refreshing compared to the usual, clear - nay, blatant - "good versus evil"-stuff we usually get served as popcorn-cinema.
It may not be fair to 3, but have you seen 1 and 2? Have you seen 3? Is there really a difference that I should note? And, I hope so. More great stuff with a new take on things beats no new stuff by a long shot.
As someone who has seen all of these.
Comparision -
Best action sequences - Dhoom 3
Best villain - Dhoom 2
Best songs and stuff - Dhoom 2
Best Story - Dhoom 2 (I'd say 3 holds up well as well)
Slickest Action Film - Dhoom 2
Best acted - Dhoom 3 (largely due to how much Amir Khan had to do in the film)
Basically, Dhoom 1 & Dhoom 3 are experiments. Dhoom 1 was obviously a testing the waters kind of film. It works on many levels, and did a competent job at setting up the franchise. However, since every sequel only went bigger, Dhoom 1 is largely forgettable. Dhoom 3 is an experiment in the sense that it tries to inject morality into the series, which i think fails, because the plot twists are really, really unbelievable, even for it's hyper reality. This relates to the offensive portrayal movie bob was talking about.
Dhoom 2 is where it is at. And i'm not joking. Everything is perfectly crazy, and is also perfectly believable. The villain is AMAZING and is truly a thief, plus, it also has incredible chemistry : the romances are very well done and intense. The ending is VERY satisfying, the endings of both 1 & 3 leave you with an incredibly bitter taste. I must urge every one here to watch 2 first, then go into 3.
trailer for 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrFkjw0WcQ0