There was an actual movie movie made about 12 years ago with Liam Neeson. It's based on the book, not the musical. It's actually a pretty decent movie.Mr.Tea said:I'm already biased since I fucking hate... nah, what's stronger than hate? Oh, I megaloathe musicals. But seriously, why couldn't they make a real movie with this?
And then it had to star Anne Hathaway and Hugh Jackman... I don't think they could have made this film less appealing to me.
Edit: OH! And then there's having to listen to anglophones keep pronouncing French names... Oh how much better it (and indeed any movie) would have been with Cristoph Waltz.
Other then butchering Cosette name, I admit nothing to drive me insane, at 2:01 sound like he calling her Cassette. =psammysoso said:Heehee, laughing at the people losing their mind over Bob's changing accent.
Is it really that big of a deal?
19th centuryJudgeGame said:giving you a 10 page tragic biography of their families so you can get an idea of what being lower class in the 17th century was like.
Right you are. I'm terrible at history and dates.iniudan said:19th centuryJudgeGame said:giving you a 10 page tragic biography of their families so you can get an idea of what being lower class in the 17th century was like.
But if people only reviewed films they liked reviews would be pointless. It's like that time that reviewer who famously loathed superhero movies said Captain America was pretty great, that let people know it was a damn good film. If it wasn't for reviewers like him, we would never find out how to improve superhero films because we'd just get unoriginal feedback from people who have no interest in seeing superhero movies transcend their self-imposed limitations. If we don't get people who aren't interested in musical films critisize musical films, we'll never figure out how to make musical films not suck.Baresark said:I don't know why this review is occurring.... this movie was number three on his ten most hated movies of the year. I think that is review enough. His reasoning is kind of irrelevant. Comparing it to the book is also irrelevant as the movie is clearly aimed at the crowd who liked and are into watching, musical theatre. It seems to me that Bob probably does not like musical theatre, which is 100% Ok, but then it kind of skews what he may have to say about a movie adapted from the musical theatre version of the story.
That whole concert, gods that is fantastic music. I wish I had found this video before! I love it! Thank you good sir!saintdane05 said:If anything, he shouldn't be in the movie.
<spoiler=Two video at once>
<youtube=fB1OgS0MuBs>
<youtube=TN9SQAcW5Dw>
THAT is how you perform Jarvert.
<youtube=Iz13cWUokOs>
Here's the whole concert. Guess the guys like it up on youtube or something.
IT actually is quite a good movie. You just need abit a patience. And be able to listen to Russel Crowe sing.Padwolf said:That whole concert, gods that is fantastic music. I wish I had found this video before! I love it! Thank you good sir!saintdane05 said:If anything, he shouldn't be in the movie.
<spoiler=Two video at once>
<youtube=fB1OgS0MuBs>
<youtube=TN9SQAcW5Dw>
THAT is how you perform Jarvert.
<youtube=Iz13cWUokOs>
Here's the whole concert. Guess the guys like it up on youtube or something.![]()
It's a shame the film is bad, I really wanted to see it. No doubt I still will go and see it, but if it's so bad it brings Movie Bob's accent out I wouldn't want to waste money D: but I love musicals so much, so I will probably end up liking it by the end.
For a movie producton of it that is really not bad at all. I want to see it nowsaintdane05 said:IT actually is quite a good movie. You just need abit a patience. And be able to listen to Russel Crowe sing.
<youtube=v6qGqdaNIJM>
I'm fine with him reviewing it. I just don't think it's necessary because everyone already knows his feelings on the movie. And I don't think musicals are really the same situation as other movies (especially Les Mis as it has zero spoken lines unlike a lot of other musical films). No one is going to argue better direction is not warranted. And I wasn't a huge fan of so many shots that were just zoomed in on peoples faces (makes for a boring movie).JudgeGame said:But if people only reviewed films they liked reviews would be pointless. It's like that time that reviewer who famously loathed superhero movies said Captain America was pretty great, that let people know it was a damn good film. If it wasn't for reviewers like him, we would never find out how to improve superhero films because we'd just get unoriginal feedback from people who have no interest in seeing superhero movies transcend their self-imposed limitations. If we don't get people who aren't interested in musical films critisize musical films, we'll never figure out how to make musical films not suck.Baresark said:I don't know why this review is occurring.... this movie was number three on his ten most hated movies of the year. I think that is review enough. His reasoning is kind of irrelevant. Comparing it to the book is also irrelevant as the movie is clearly aimed at the crowd who liked and are into watching, musical theatre. It seems to me that Bob probably does not like musical theatre, which is 100% Ok, but then it kind of skews what he may have to say about a movie adapted from the musical theatre version of the story.
I thought Javert was Jean's foil. One follows the law of the state even if it means doing wrong, while the other does what is right regardless of the law. I guess I can see what you're saying, though. Nice use of accents.iniudan said:HTF to you write out Thénardier from the story, especially when focusing on Valjean ? He's his foil.
Has for the name you ask, Éponine, she is Thénardier's elder daughter. If the story focus on Valjean she could indeed be easily ignored.
I honestly think you will enjoy it. The problematic directing aside, the show was honestly pretty great, in my opinion. Not perfect but you will have wow moments as far as the production is concerned. This is a very divisive movie though, it seems you either like it or hate with little middle ground to be had. And don't let anyone fool you, Crowe's performance, while far from the best the show has ever seen, isn't as bad as it's made out to be. Don't go in expecting to be blown away by all the performances, but some of them will blow you away. Others you will be disappointed in, but they aren't as bad as they are made out to be. But if you don't, there is always rental when it comes out on DVD.Padwolf said:That whole concert, gods that is fantastic music. I wish I had found this video before! I love it! Thank you good sir!saintdane05 said:snip![]()
It's a shame the film is bad, I really wanted to see it. No doubt I still will go and see it, but if it's so bad it brings Movie Bob's accent out I wouldn't want to waste money D: but I love musicals so much, so I will probably end up liking it by the end.
Consider Javert the antagonist, has his point is not to make Valjean seem more grandiose, while Thénardier is a scum whose action are there to be contrasted with Valjean one.Daaaah Whoosh said:I thought Javert was Jean's foil. One follows the law of the state even if it means doing wrong, while the other does what is right regardless of the law. I guess I can see what you're saying, though. Nice use of accents.iniudan said:HTF to you write out Thénardier from the story, especially when focusing on Valjean ? He's his foil.
Has for the name you ask, Éponine, she is Thénardier's elder daughter. If the story focus on Valjean she could indeed be easily ignored.
Out of those three, only the last is a legitimate complaint. The first one is complaining that the movie is true to its source material. The second... the scene was written for a medium that does not get Oscars(live stage performance) and based on a book that predates the Oscars. Complaining that the scene is Oscar bait is like complaining that The Lord of the Rings felt like a generic D&D adventure.Random Argument Man said:From what I've heard about this film, it would've been better if they did more than one movie. If you're going to adapt a huge book with so many characters, you would probably need to give things a bit more time to develop. ... And Russel Crowe would've had a lot more practice for his scenes.
Um...Have you watched the review for only 15 seconds?samus17 said:All I got from Bob on this one was:
I've read the book and it's not as good
and
I don't do musicals and here's why
-Did you miss the part where he said that there's too much characters with not much time to develop them?
-Did you miss the part where he said that Anne Hatawhatever's part is pretty much a fat Oscar bait?
-Did you miss the part where he wasn't surprised that the movie sucked because it was the King's Speech's director?
Amongst other things...
Note*Sorry if it sounded like I was pissed at you.