I didn't say anything about people who enjoyed Scott Pilgrim. Most of the derogatory statements I made were about it's target audience. The word "hipster" is slang. Considering the fact that it wasn't coined by a think-tank or a scientist, but came to the social consciousness through popular use, it means whatever the majority of people think it means. So, your assertion that "most people" use the word without knowing what it means indicates that you don't understand how slang works.Spink said:Jesus that's incredibly rude. Don't get uppity over Bob's comments and then go make assumptions over people who enjoyed Scott Pilgrim. That's the definition of a hypocrite. That being said everyone throws around the word hipster without knowing what it means.PhiMed said:snip
People don't like Scott Pilgrim by going into it with poor expectations and refusing to like it for reasons like casting choice or just inherent prejudices against what they think the movie stands for. That's why it is disappointing when does poorly in the box office, Edgar Wright really made that movie work and is a far better director than Stallone. It is evident he put a great deal of effort to make that movie work and give it a unique feel. To be fair having looked over the books afterwards I'm surprised he was able to turn it into an enjoyable movie.
Stallone has his own little niche but all he does nowadays is remake his old movies or just make homages to his old movies.
Statements like yours exemplify my problem with most of the praise of this movie and movies like it, and my main problem with Bob's review. I talked about the marketting campaign, the themes of the movie, and the composition of the audience in the theater. Bob talked about anyone who enjoyed the Expendables. There's a difference. Your accusation of hypocrisy is baseless.
I stated in my post that I enjoyed both movies, and I still got the standard, boiler-plate response to any statement that suggests that people shouldn't be surprised about The Expendables beating out Scott Pilgrim. I'm so tired of hearing the same sorts of statements about movies like this. The condescending, snide combination of "If you don't like it, you didn't understand it," "You aren't able to look past your dislike for a particular actor," and "You lack the proper cultural reference," that you just used do nothing to advance your cause. All it does is make the person you're talking to think you're an undeservedly pretentious prick who can't cite anything actually truly meritorious about the work you're defending, or in this case asserting is objectively superior to another.
Protip: "The director worked really hard" (which is true for the vast majority of movies) and "he really made it work" (which is ENTIRELY your opinion) don't count as merits.